Moronity grade scale

On Nov 3, 11:52 am, PD wrote:
On 11/2/2011 3:25 PM, wrote:

96-100 OUTSTANDING MORONITY QUALITY. You can't get any lower than
this. For years and years these guys have been unable to write even a
single sentence which make any sense at all. Also they are remarkable
in that they are very prolific in writing all this nonsense.

90-95 VERY HIGH MORONITY QUALITY. This is demonstrated by a long
period of writing nonsense, which if not very prolific is on the
average continuous in time.

86-89 GOOD TO HIGH MORONITY QUALITY. These guys are working hard,
since they have appeared later, to beat higher graded morons. It is
expected that they will for sure reach and even surpass the moronity
grade of older morons.

80-85 DECENT MORONITY QUALITY. These guys are too morons to even
realize they could increase their moronity and ascend to higher
grades.

70-79 ADEQUATE MORONITY FACTOR. These guys are part time morons. They
post some nonsense and they usually disappear.

60-69 SOME MINOR MORONITY QUALITY FLAWS. These guys are morons that
once in a while write with some rationality. Unfortunately, on the
average, they continue to be....morons.

BELOW 60 MOSTLY NORMAL PEOPLE. These guys are mostly knowledgeable
people whose only moronity consist in trying to teach all the higher
graded morons that infest this group.

I'm ready to grade a number by this scale.
Byron Forbes - 88
John (NoEinstein) Armistead - 97
Conrad Countess - 99
Ralph (Henry Wilson) Rabbidge - 88
Koobee Wublee - 80
Androcles - 81
Ken Seto - 95
Mitch Raemsch - 98
Arindam Banerjee – 93

This is just too funny. A self-proclaimed professor of physics who
did not understand Snell’s law and the Lorentz transform is able to
call someone else a moron. shrug

He is greatly offended given the lowest moronity score. What’s up
with that? Does PD show fear in His (not PD’s) postings? Is PD
feeling intimidated? Is the only recourse babbling and lies from PD?

Ps. Try reeling in your lap dog, Jerry, on the gradient index of
gravitational lens. The imbecile is still running wild, and that will
eventually focus the attention on a professor of physics who did not
understand Snell’s law. shrug

On Nov 9, 9:30*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Nov 3, 11:52 am, PD wrote:





On 11/2/2011 3:25 PM, wrote:
96-100 OUTSTANDING MORONITY QUALITY. You can't get any lower than
this. For years and years these guys have been unable to write even a
single sentence which make any sense at all. Also they are remarkable
in that they are very prolific in writing all this nonsense.

90-95 VERY HIGH MORONITY QUALITY. This is demonstrated by a long
period of writing nonsense, which if not very prolific is on the
average continuous in time.

86-89 GOOD TO HIGH MORONITY QUALITY. These guys are working hard,
since they have appeared later, to beat higher graded morons. It is
expected that they will for sure reach and even surpass the moronity
grade of older morons.

80-85 DECENT MORONITY QUALITY. These guys are too morons to even
realize they could increase their moronity and ascend to higher
grades.

70-79 ADEQUATE MORONITY FACTOR. These guys are part time morons. They
post some nonsense and they usually disappear.

60-69 SOME MINOR MORONITY QUALITY FLAWS. These guys are morons that
once in a while write with some rationality. Unfortunately, on the
average, they continue to be....morons.

BELOW 60 MOSTLY NORMAL PEOPLE. These guys are mostly knowledgeable
people whose only moronity consist in trying to teach all the higher
graded morons that infest this group.

I'm ready to grade a number by this scale.
Byron Forbes - 88
John (NoEinstein) Armistead - 97
Conrad Countess - 99
Ralph (Henry Wilson) Rabbidge - 88
Koobee Wublee - 80
Androcles - 81
Ken Seto - 95
Mitch Raemsch - 98
Arindam Banerjee – 93

This is just too funny. *A self-proclaimed professor of physics who
did not understand Snell’s law and the Lorentz transform is able to
call someone else a moron. *shrug

He is greatly offended given the lowest moronity score.



Oh, dear! You should count your blessings, say thank you for the high
score given to you (at least twice as much as anyone could have given
after reading your posts) and stay quiet.

Tonio

Pd. Oops, I almost forgot: shrug!

On Nov 9, 2:30*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Nov 3, 11:52 am, PD wrote:









On 11/2/2011 3:25 PM, wrote:
96-100 OUTSTANDING MORONITY QUALITY. You can't get any lower than
this. For years and years these guys have been unable to write even a
single sentence which make any sense at all. Also they are remarkable
in that they are very prolific in writing all this nonsense.

90-95 VERY HIGH MORONITY QUALITY. This is demonstrated by a long
period of writing nonsense, which if not very prolific is on the
average continuous in time.

86-89 GOOD TO HIGH MORONITY QUALITY. These guys are working hard,
since they have appeared later, to beat higher graded morons. It is
expected that they will for sure reach and even surpass the moronity
grade of older morons.

80-85 DECENT MORONITY QUALITY. These guys are too morons to even
realize they could increase their moronity and ascend to higher
grades.

70-79 ADEQUATE MORONITY FACTOR. These guys are part time morons. They
post some nonsense and they usually disappear.

60-69 SOME MINOR MORONITY QUALITY FLAWS. These guys are morons that
once in a while write with some rationality. Unfortunately, on the
average, they continue to be....morons.

BELOW 60 MOSTLY NORMAL PEOPLE. These guys are mostly knowledgeable
people whose only moronity consist in trying to teach all the higher
graded morons that infest this group.

I'm ready to grade a number by this scale.
Byron Forbes - 88
John (NoEinstein) Armistead - 97
Conrad Countess - 99
Ralph (Henry Wilson) Rabbidge - 88
Koobee Wublee - 80
Androcles - 81
Ken Seto - 95
Mitch Raemsch - 98
Arindam Banerjee – 93

This is just too funny. *A self-proclaimed professor of physics who
did not understand Snell’s law and the Lorentz transform is able to
call someone else a moron. *shrug

He is greatly offended given the lowest moronity score. *What’s up
with that? *Does PD show fear in His (not PD’s) postings? *Is PD
feeling intimidated? *Is the only recourse babbling and lies from PD?

Ps. *Try reeling in your lap dog, Jerry, on the gradient index of
gravitational lens. *The imbecile is still running wild, and that will
eventually focus the attention on a professor of physics who did not
understand Snell’s law. *shrug

Well Snell's law is one of those mental crutch rules of science.
The people who understand how optics discover lasers anyway.
The people who understand how crystals work, discover artficial
diamonds anyway.
The people who understand how biology works, discover DNA anyway,
The people who understand how computers discover atomic clocks,
integrated circuits,
USB, Holograms, and post Maxwellian Crank-a-Thons anyway.
The people who know how engineering works discover GPS, Self-
Replicating Machines,
Microwave Cooling, and 21st Century non GM Bimbo Helos anyway,

On Nov 9, 12:34 am, PD wrote:
On 11/9/2011 1:30 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Nov 3, 11:52 am, wrote:

I'm ready to grade a number by this scale.
Byron Forbes - 88
John (NoEinstein) Armistead - 97
Conrad Countess - 99
Ralph (Henry Wilson) Rabbidge - 88
Koobee Wublee - 80
Androcles - 81
Ken Seto - 95
Mitch Raemsch - 98
Arindam Banerjee – 93

This is just too funny. A self-proclaimed professor of physics who
did not understand Snell’s law and the Lorentz transform is able to
call someone else a moron. shrug

He is greatly offended given the lowest moronity score. What’s up
with that? Does PD show fear in His (not PD’s) postings? Is PD
feeling intimidated? Is the only recourse babbling and lies from PD?

Ps. Try reeling in your lap dog, Jerry, on the gradient index of
gravitational lens. The imbecile is still running wild, and that will
eventually focus the attention on a professor of physics who did not
understand Snell’s law.shrug

Of course the beautiful thing about the moronity scale is that it has an
inversion transform. No doubt you are familiar with it.

PD is just too fvcking dumb. Let Him to be more point blank with this
imbecile who was a college-level physics professor. It is indeed a
great honor to be called an idiot by an imbecile. Einstein
Dingleberries are just getting dumber and dumber every year. There
will be a day when these imbeciles will argue that (1 + 1 = 3), and a
series of books will be published based on that theme. Eventually a
Nobel Prize will be awarded to someone who could show (1 + 1 = 4).
shrug

The self-styled physicists all live in their fantasy worlds of voodoo
science and mathemaGics. There are only two words to describe these
Einstein Dingleberries who are indeed out of touch with the real world
they live in --- “fvcking sad”. shrug