EINSTEIN'S 'BIGGEST BLUNDER' TURNS OUT TO BE RIGHT

If the Universe expands from a central point uniformly, than it must
be expanding spherically, and if Cosmological constant expansion = “c,
the speed of light”, as was also inferred, than this would act as a
centrifugal force balance to the centripetal force of gravity
attraction, and stabilize a dynamic expanding and contracting
universal pattern, that is evident throughout the entire universe

Remember, that the expanding cosmological constant force is a counter
balance to the gravity force, and would be analogous to, as Hawking
once said, “a universe that expands from a point as a planet might be
shaped and traced from one of its poles to its equator, only to return
its shape to the opposite pole tracing out a spherical shape.

And this might be the dynamic and stable trajectory of an ever
expanding and contracting universe, as opposed to one that had only
one beginning, in a Big Bang, and one ending with a Big Crunch.

Conrad J Countess

On 12/20/10 7:26 PM, cjcountess wrote:
If the Universe expands from a central point uniformly

The universe does not expand from a central point!

No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html

Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html

WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html

WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html

On Dec 20, 5:26*pm, cjcountess wrote:
If the Universe expands from a central point uniformly, than it must
be expanding spherically, and if Cosmological constant expansion = “c,
the speed of light”, as was also inferred, than this would act as a
centrifugal force balance to the centripetal force of gravity
attraction, and stabilize a dynamic expanding and contracting
universal pattern, that is evident throughout the entire universe

Remember, that the expanding cosmological constant force is a counter
balance to the gravity force, and would be analogous to, as Hawking
once said, “a universe that expands from a point as a planet might be
shaped and traced from one of its poles to its equator, only to return
its shape to the opposite pole tracing out a spherical shape.

And this might be the dynamic and stable trajectory of an ever
expanding and contracting universe, as opposed to one that had only
one beginning, in a Big Bang, and one ending with a Big Crunch.

Conrad J Countess

Going round and round in never ending circles it seems. Have you heard
of 'God' ? These 'scientists' should also be asked the same question.
It took Einstein a long time to get there, I think. You may be in the
initial stages of the search for truth. Might need more time.

Einstien's theories on Relativity and Newton's Theory of Gravitation
are not true. ( Please see my previous posts in the newsgroup -
soc.culture.indian ). I am quite surprised that they are still being
taught or believed in everywhere in this world. It took so long for
them to be invalidated !

About the speed of light, etc, we will get to that in due course of
time. No hurry.

There is more to come about 'scientific theories' of today like Cell
Theory, Genetic Theory etc.... Keep a lookout.

- HSN.

Very interesting.

You are correct,

I am in search, and sometimes I find and share truth, and I have
traced the scientific to the religious, and vice verse, see: http://cjc123.com/
Where it clearly points out that the geometrical structure of the
universe is parallel to that of the mind, as if the universe is a
universal mind, and our minds, miniature universes.

I will keep a look out for your work and you might find mine
interesting and overlapping with your own also

Clearly both theories of gravity, Einstein’s and Newton’s, are
incomplete, and I have added to both, in my (Geometrical
Interpretation of E=mc^2 = E=mc^circled and/or sphered)

http://wbabin.net/science/countess.pdf

Interesting

Conrad J Countess

See this from:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6tIee8FwX8

And
http://bigthink.com/ideas/25144


This is the answer

http://cjc123.com/
http://wbabin.net/science/countess.pdf


From this perspective


Intelligent Design, Evolution, and Creationism, are all unified, and
there is no conflict. And so are science and religion in general.
All religions are relative to place and time, although not
necessarily
equal, and also interrelated to one scientific perspective, in a sort
of "Special and General Relativity", of Science and Religion.
This is the "Cosmic Perspective of The Cosmic Alignment",
scientifically outlined in this book.
The road to the unity of the mind and the Universe is clearly
outlined, and the path clear.
This is the power of this perspective of this (Cosmic Alignment of
the
Cosmic Mind and the Cosmic Pattern).
Furthermore, (The Geometrical Interpretation of (E=mc^2 =
E=mc^circled
and/or sphered), that supplements it, clearly shows that "The Inverse
Square Law", that was interpreted as leading to "Infinite Frequency",
upon which the "Big Bang", and "Black Holes", were deduced, are
clearly seen to be reinterpreted as leading to a state of "Rest Mass"
and an "Interrelated Background Space Energy Field", from which it
logically emerged, as opposed to the "Absolute Beginning", and "End
of
Matter, Motion, Space, and Time", and "The Cosmic Pattern", that it
outlines it is evidence of a "Continual Pattern of Centrifugal/
Centripetal Forces", that cyclically follow each other,
in the form that geometricaly shows that the structure of the
universe
and the mind is parrell to eachother,
and that the universe is motivating us to alighn ourselves with it.


Conrad J Countess

On Dec 21, 4:50*pm, cjcountess wrote:
See this from:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6tIee8FwX8

Andhttp://bigthink.com/ideas/25144

This is the answer

http://cjc123.com/http://wbabin.net/...e/countess.pdf

From this perspective

Intelligent Design, Evolution, and Creationism, are all unified, and
there is no conflict. And so are science and religion in general.
All religions are relative to place and time, although not
necessarily
equal, and also interrelated to one scientific perspective, in a sort
of "Special and General Relativity", of Science and Religion.
This is the "Cosmic Perspective of The Cosmic Alignment",
scientifically outlined in this book.
The road to the unity of the mind and the Universe is clearly
outlined, and the path clear.
This is the power of this perspective of this (Cosmic Alignment of
the
Cosmic Mind and the Cosmic Pattern).
Furthermore, (The Geometrical Interpretation of (E=mc^2 =
E=mc^circled
and/or sphered), that supplements it, clearly shows that "The Inverse
Square Law", that was interpreted as leading to "Infinite Frequency",
upon which the "Big Bang", and "Black Holes", were deduced, are
clearly seen to be reinterpreted as leading to a state of "Rest Mass"
and an "Interrelated Background Space Energy Field", from which it
logically emerged, as opposed to the "Absolute Beginning", and "End
of
Matter, Motion, Space, and Time", and "The Cosmic Pattern", that it
outlines it is evidence of a "Continual Pattern of Centrifugal/
Centripetal Forces", that cyclically follow each other,
*in the form that geometricaly shows that the structure of the
universe
and the mind is parrell to eachother,
and that the universe is motivating us to alighn ourselves with it.

Conrad J Countess

You are beginning to get it, I think. It is all in the mind. Each
person sees God through his/her own actions. Each person also
interprets the structure of the Universe by his/her perception of it.
The perception can be moulded to any extent with spheres and circles
and what not until in the end you find still more questions to be
answered. You leave that part to God. That is the summary of it.

- HSN.