How much more proof does one need?

Einstein's second postulate is clearly wrong.

Here is another typical 'cepheid' brightness curve, easily matched with a BaTh
simulation.

The apparent brightness variation is caused by changes in the emitted light's
speed towards Earth as the star orbits it barycentre with a large planet.

Just about ALL 'cepheid' curves can be explained in this way. 'Cepheids' are
not pulsating stars at all. When are astronomers going to wake up and stop
making complete fools of themselves.


Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:53:57 GMT, HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:
Sorry, here's the website:
www.scisite.info/R Cru2.jpg

Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..

"Henry Wilson DSc ." HW@.. wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:53:57 GMT, HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:
Sorry, here's the website:
www.scisite.info/R Cru2.jpg

Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..


There you are, you old bugger. When you didn't show for a
couple of days I was getting worried about ya.
If you want to space in a URL you need "%20", like this:
www.scisite.info/R%20Cru2.jpg

Henry Wilson DSc . HW@.. wrote in message


Einstein's second postulate is clearly wrong.

Wilson's degrees are clearly forged:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...gedDegree.html
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus...ri/diploma.htm

Dirk Vdm

HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:

Einstein's second postulate is clearly wrong.

Here is another typical 'cepheid' brightness curve, easily matched with a
BaTh simulation.

The apparent brightness variation is caused by changes in the emitted
light's speed towards Earth as the star orbits it barycentre with a large
planet.

Cephids aren't planetary systems.


Just about ALL 'cepheid' curves can be explained in this way. 'Cepheids'
are not pulsating stars at all. When are astronomers going to wake up and
stop making complete fools of themselves.

Around the time you post under your real name.



Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:39:14 -0000, "Androcles"
wrote:


"Henry Wilson DSc ." HW@.. wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:53:57 GMT, HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:
Sorry, here's the website:
www.scisite.info/R Cru2.jpg

Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..


There you are, you old bugger. When you didn't show for a
couple of days I was getting worried about ya.
If you want to space in a URL you need "%20", like this:
www.scisite.info/R%20Cru2.jpg

OK Try this: http://www.scisite.info/r_cru.jpg

Pretty convincing, eh?

Note, 'velocity' is true radial velocity towards Earth. It includes pitch. I
haven't bothered to set either distance or velocity at any measured value
because I cannot find reliable figures. Hipparcos and Tycho give different
values for parallax. 1.9 and 3.1 mas respectively. However, the product
(distance x velocity) is the important factor. Reducing one by a particular
factor and increasing the other by the same amount produces the same curve, as
you should know.


Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..

On Nov 21, 12:42*pm, HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:39:14 -0000, "Androcles"
wrote:







"Henry Wilson DSc ." HW@.. wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:53:57 GMT, HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:
Sorry, here's the website:
www.scisite.info/RCru2.jpg

Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

* * * Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..

There you are, you old bugger. When you didn't show for a
couple of days I was getting worried about ya.
If you want to space in a URL you need "%20", like this:
*www.scisite.info/R%20Cru2.jpg

OK Try this:http://www.scisite.info/r_cru.jpg

Pretty convincing, eh?

Note, 'velocity' is true radial velocity towards Earth. It includes pitch.. I
haven't bothered to set either distance or velocity at any measured value
because I cannot find reliable figures. Hipparcos and Tycho give different
values for parallax. 1.9 and 3.1 mas respectively. However, the product
(distance x velocity) is the important factor. Reducing one by a particular
factor and increasing the other by the same amount produces the same curve, as
you should know.

Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

* * * *Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The speed of light is a constant until inside the atom.

Mitch Raemsch

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:04:22 -0800 (PST), BURT wrote:

On Nov 21, 12:42*pm, HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:39:14 -0000, "Androcles"
wrote:







"Henry Wilson DSc ." HW@.. wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:53:57 GMT, HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:
Sorry, here's the website:
www.scisite.info/RCru2.jpg

Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

* * * Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..

There you are, you old bugger. When you didn't show for a
couple of days I was getting worried about ya.
If you want to space in a URL you need "%20", like this:
*www.scisite.info/R%20Cru2.jpg

OK Try this:http://www.scisite.info/r_cru.jpg

Pretty convincing, eh?

Note, 'velocity' is true radial velocity towards Earth. It includes pitch. I
haven't bothered to set either distance or velocity at any measured value
because I cannot find reliable figures. Hipparcos and Tycho give different
values for parallax. 1.9 and 3.1 mas respectively. However, the product
(distance x velocity) is the important factor. Reducing one by a particular
factor and increasing the other by the same amount produces the same curve, as
you should know.

Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

* * * *Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The speed of light is a constant until inside the atom.

....idiot..

Mitch Raemsch


Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..

"Henry Wilson DSc." HW@.. wrote in message
news
Einstein's second postulate is clearly wrong.

Except all experimental evidence supports it being correct

"Henry Wilson DSc." HW@.. wrote in message
...
Pretty convincing, eh?

Nothing a known liar such as yourself posts would be convincing