Democratic Bush NAZI Collaborators On Notice

On Jan 6, 8:31*pm, kT wrote:


Suck on it, bitch.

sorry, kt - but I don't roll that way. but at least we know why you
use the handle. Oh, don't worry - they know where you are. you're
scheduled for round up.

Tim Crowley wrote:
On Jan 6, 7:51 pm, z wrote:
Tim Crowley wrote in news:03492b3d-6edc-4cf5-b549-
:

On Jan 6, 5:19 pm, kT wrote:
Democratic Bush NAZI Collaborators On Notice :
Dianne Feinstein, Jay Rockefeller et. al. - you be ****ed.
WOW!!!!! What wit, what wisdom. Buahahahahhahaha
hint, keep it up, you might make k000k of the month. I'll root for
you.
Both of those people enabled the crimes of Bush and his ilk. They need to
be drummed out of office.

I know, you run against one of them and your friend Kt can run against
the other. That would be so special.

Do you think Jesus will be voting?

Jesus is so special.

Tim Crowley wrote in
:

On Jan 6, 7:51*pm, z wrote:
Tim Crowley wrote in
news:03492b3d-6edc-4cf5-b54
9-
:

On Jan 6, 5:19*pm, kT wrote:
Democratic Bush NAZI Collaborators On Notice :

Dianne Feinstein, Jay Rockefeller et. al. - you be ****ed.

WOW!!!!! *What wit, what wisdom. * Buahahahahhahaha

hint, keep it up, you might make k000k of the month. *I'll root for
you.

Both of those people enabled the crimes of Bush and his ilk. *They
need
to
be drummed out of office.

I know, you run against one of them and your friend Kt can run against
the other. That would be so special.

My state kicked out the guy who supported Bushy .. and the other guy
opposed him nearly 100% of the time. Unlike most of the boot licking
cowards that make up most of the democratic party.

Tim Crowley wrote:
On Jan 6, 8:31 pm, kT wrote:

Time to shave that bitches' head.

Terrorist threat forwarded to Federal Law Enforecement.

http://www.strangecosmos.com/content/item/142290.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pursuit..._collaborators

"Women who were suspected of having romantic liaisons with Germans, or
more often of being German prostitutes, were publicly humiliated by
having their heads shaved"

Suck on it, bitch.

sorry, kt - but I don't roll that way. but at least we know why you
use the handle. Oh, don't worry - they know where you are. you're
scheduled for round up.

Dude, you need to switch political parties right away!

You Jesus freaks just love that jack booted government thuggery stuff.

Next I suppose you'll want to crucify me. My how far you have fallen.

http://www.secularhumanism.org/libra...britt_23_2.htm

Analysis of these seven regimes reveals fourteen common threads that
link them in recognizable patterns of national behavior and abuse of
power. These basic characteristics are more prevalent and intense in
some regimes than in others, but they all share at least some level of
similarity.

1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism. From the
prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins,
the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime
itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious.
Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common
themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a
suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.

2. Disdain for the importance of human rights. The regimes themselves
viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing the
objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the
population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by
marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was
egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.

3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause. The most
significant common thread among these regimes was the use of
scapegoating as a means to divert the people’s attention from other
problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in
controlled directions. The methods of choice—relentless propaganda and
disinformation—were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite
“spontaneous” acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists,
socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional
national enemies, members of other religions, secularists, homosexuals,
and “terrorists.” Active opponents of these regimes were inevitably
labeled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly.

4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism. Ruling elites always
identified closely with the military and the industrial infrastructure
that supported it. A disproportionate share of national resources was
allocated to the military, even when domestic needs were acute. The
military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was used whenever
possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations, and
increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.

5. Rampant sexism. Beyond the simple fact that the political elite and
the national culture were male-dominated, these regimes inevitably
viewed women as second-class citizens. They were adamantly anti-abortion
and also homophobic. These attitudes were usually codified in Draconian
laws that enjoyed strong support by the orthodox religion of the
country, thus lending the regime cover for its abuses.

6. A controlled mass media. Under some of the regimes, the mass media
were under strict direct control and could be relied upon never to stray
from the party line. Other regimes exercised more subtle power to ensure
media orthodoxy. Methods included the control of licensing and access to
resources, economic pressure, appeals to patriotism, and implied
threats. The leaders of the mass media were often politically compatible
with the power elite. The result was usually success in keeping the
general public unaware of the regimes’ excesses.

7. Obsession with national security. Inevitably, a national security
apparatus was under direct control of the ruling elite. It was usually
an instrument of oppression, operating in secret and beyond any
constraints. Its actions were justified under the rubric of protecting
“national security,” and questioning its activities was portrayed as
unpatriotic or even treasonous.

8. Religion and ruling elite tied together. Unlike communist regimes,
the fascist and protofascist regimes were never proclaimed as godless by
their opponents. In fact, most of the regimes attached themselves to the
predominant religion of the country and chose to portray themselves as
militant defenders of that religion. The fact that the ruling elite’s
behavior was incompatible with the precepts of the religion was
generally swept under the rug. Propaganda kept up the illusion that the
ruling elites were defenders of the faith and opponents of the
“godless.” A perception was manufactured that opposing the power elite
was tantamount to an attack on religion.

9. Power of corporations protected. Although the personal life of
ordinary citizens was under strict control, the ability of large
corporations to operate in relative freedom was not compromised. The
ruling elite saw the corporate structure as a way to not only ensure
military production (in developed states), but also as an additional
means of social control. Members of the economic elite were often
pampered by the political elite to ensure a continued mutuality of
interests, especially in the repression of “have-not” citizens.

10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated. Since organized labor was
seen as the one power center that could challenge the political hegemony
of the ruling elite and its corporate allies, it was inevitably crushed
or made powerless. The poor formed an underclass, viewed with suspicion
or outright contempt. Under some regimes, being poor was considered akin
to a vice.

11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts. Intellectuals
and the inherent freedom of ideas and expression associated with them
were anathema to these regimes. Intellectual and academic freedom were
considered subversive to national security and the patriotic ideal.
Universities were tightly controlled; politically unreliable faculty
harassed or eliminated. Unorthodox ideas or expressions of dissent were
strongly attacked, silenced, or crushed. To these regimes, art and
literature should serve the national interest or they had no right to exist.

12. Obsession with crime and punishment. Most of these regimes
maintained Draconian systems of criminal justice with huge prison
populations. The police were often glorified and had almost unchecked
power, leading to rampant abuse. “Normal” and political crime were often
merged into trumped-up criminal charges and sometimes used against
political opponents of the regime. Fear, and hatred, of criminals or
“traitors” was often promoted among the population as an excuse for more
police power.

13. Rampant cronyism and corruption. Those in business circles and close
to the power elite often used their position to enrich themselves. This
corruption worked both ways; the power elite would receive financial
gifts and property from the economic elite, who in turn would gain the
benefit of government favoritism. Members of the power elite were in a
position to obtain vast wealth from other sources as well: for example,
by stealing national resources. With the national security apparatus
under control and the media muzzled, this corruption was largely
unconstrained and not well understood by the general population.

14. Fraudulent elections. Elections in the form of plebiscites or public
opinion polls were usually bogus. When actual elections with candidates
were held, they would usually be perverted by the power elite to get the
desired result. Common methods included maintaining control of the
election machinery, intimidating and disenfranchising opposition voters,
destroying or disallowing legal votes, and, as a last resort, turning to
a judiciary beholden to the power elite.

Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is
America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a constitution, a
free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly
being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these are
just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not.

On Jan 6, 8:46*pm, kT wrote:



Dude, you need to switch political parties right away!



No thanks.

What do you think my party is?

Damn, you're a dumb one.

In the meantime, you may well find out that threatening a US Senator
is not a good idea.

Tim Crowley wrote:
On Jan 6, 8:46 pm, kT wrote:

Dude, you need to switch political parties right away!



No thanks.

What do you think my party is?

The Jesus Party. The Asshole Party. The American Traitor Party.

Damn, you're a dumb one.

In the meantime, you may well find out that threatening a US Senator
is not a good idea.

I didn't threaten her, asshole, but I have NO as in ZERO respect for the
United States Senate as it stands right now. What we have are a bunch of
obstructionist assholes, illiterate assholes, Jesus assholes, and with
Dianne Feinstein and Jay Rockefeller, we have treasonous assholes.

Getting her ****ing pussy shaved by being voted out of office is mild
punishment for utterly failing to defend and uphold the Constitution of
the United States of America. Do what do you not understand the level of
my contempt for some democratic senators on the intelligence committee?

You can go fascist on me all you want, but it won't shut me up. Got it?

Now go chew on the fate of your country, asshole :

http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/us...l?ref=business

Time to shave that bitches' head.

Terrorist threat forwarded to Federal Law Enforecement.

http://www.strangecosmos.com/content/item/142290.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pursuit..._collaborators

"Women who were suspected of having romantic liaisons with Germans, or more often of being German prostitutes, were publicly humiliated by having their heads shaved"

On Jan 6, 8:43*pm, kT wrote:
Tim Crowley wrote:
On Jan 6, 7:51 pm, z wrote:
Tim Crowley wrote in news:03492b3d-6edc-4cf5-b549-
:

On Jan 6, 5:19 pm, kT wrote:
Democratic Bush NAZI Collaborators On Notice :
Dianne Feinstein, Jay Rockefeller et. al. - you be ****ed.
WOW!!!!! *What wit, what wisdom. * Buahahahahhahaha
hint, keep it up, you might make k000k of the month. *I'll root for
you.
Both of those people enabled the crimes of Bush and his ilk. *They need to
be drummed out of office.

I know, you run against one of them and your friend Kt can run against
the other. *That would be so special.

Do you think Jesus will be voting?

Jesus is so special.

Tim is an republican born-again Mafia operative, or rather a pair of
operatives plus one spare just in case either needs to take a potty
break. Like Dick Cheney, they like inflicting pain, suffering and
death.

~ BG

"kT" wrote in message
...
Obam's $ 1 Trillion Credit Card Spending Spree wrote:

"kT" wrote in message :

Democratic Bush NAZI Collaborators On Notice :

Dianne Feinstein, Jay Rockefeller et. al. - you be ****ed.

Obama apologizes to Feinstein for his CIA surprise

WASHINGTON (AP) - Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Tuesday that

she was personally responsible for the greatest oversight failure in American
history, the complete failure to uphold and defend the Constitution of the
United States of America. She was unapologetic.


That's why she wasn't consulted, and neither was anyone else in
Democratic leadership that has 'blood on their hands' with the
whole torture fiasco. They were all cut out, it wasn't a mistake.

On Jan 6, 9:16*pm, kT wrote:



You can go fascist on me all you want, but it won't shut me up. Got it?


I'm glad you spam your hate. It shows people exactly how dumb you
****ing idjits are. But you gotta expect to be made fun of.


So, you said you wanted me to change party. What party is that.


hint: you're an insane spammer

Tim Crowley wrote:
On Jan 6, 9:16 pm, kT wrote:

You can go fascist on me all you want, but it won't shut me up. Got it?

I'm glad you spam your hate. It shows people exactly how dumb you
****ing idjits are. But you gotta expect to be made fun of.

American fun :

Preemptive war based upon lies, secret prisons, 'Patriot Act', torture,
genocide, domestic surveillance, politicization of justice, religious
intrusion into science, education and government, executive malfeasance,
and the corruption of your financial institutions, among other things.

So, you said you wanted me to change party. What party is that.

The American Fascist Party.

http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12...bailout-costs/

http://www.secularhumanism.org/libra...britt_23_2.htm

Analysis of these seven regimes reveals fourteen common threads that
link them in recognizable patterns of national behavior and abuse of
power. These basic characteristics are more prevalent and intense in
some regimes than in others, but they all share at least some level of
similarity.

1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism. From the
prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins,
the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime
itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious.
Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common
themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a
suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.

2. Disdain for the importance of human rights. The regimes themselves
viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing the
objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the
population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by
marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was
egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.

3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause. The most
significant common thread among these regimes was the use of
scapegoating as a means to divert the people’s attention from other
problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in
controlled directions. The methods of choice—relentless propaganda and
disinformation—were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite
“spontaneous” acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists,
socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional
national enemies, members of other religions, secularists, homosexuals,
and “terrorists.” Active opponents of these regimes were inevitably
labeled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly.

4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism. Ruling elites always
identified closely with the military and the industrial infrastructure
that supported it. A disproportionate share of national resources was
allocated to the military, even when domestic needs were acute. The
military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was used whenever
possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations, and
increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.

5. Rampant sexism. Beyond the simple fact that the political elite and
the national culture were male-dominated, these regimes inevitably
viewed women as second-class citizens. They were adamantly anti-abortion
and also homophobic. These attitudes were usually codified in Draconian
laws that enjoyed strong support by the orthodox religion of the
country, thus lending the regime cover for its abuses.

6. A controlled mass media. Under some of the regimes, the mass media
were under strict direct control and could be relied upon never to stray
from the party line. Other regimes exercised more subtle power to ensure
media orthodoxy. Methods included the control of licensing and access to
resources, economic pressure, appeals to patriotism, and implied
threats. The leaders of the mass media were often politically compatible
with the power elite. The result was usually success in keeping the
general public unaware of the regimes’ excesses.

7. Obsession with national security. Inevitably, a national security
apparatus was under direct control of the ruling elite. It was usually
an instrument of oppression, operating in secret and beyond any
constraints. Its actions were justified under the rubric of protecting
“national security,” and questioning its activities was portrayed as
unpatriotic or even treasonous.

8. Religion and ruling elite tied together. Unlike communist regimes,
the fascist and protofascist regimes were never proclaimed as godless by
their opponents. In fact, most of the regimes attached themselves to the
predominant religion of the country and chose to portray themselves as
militant defenders of that religion. The fact that the ruling elite’s
behavior was incompatible with the precepts of the religion was
generally swept under the rug. Propaganda kept up the illusion that the
ruling elites were defenders of the faith and opponents of the
“godless.” A perception was manufactured that opposing the power elite
was tantamount to an attack on religion.

9. Power of corporations protected. Although the personal life of
ordinary citizens was under strict control, the ability of large
corporations to operate in relative freedom was not compromised. The
ruling elite saw the corporate structure as a way to not only ensure
military production (in developed states), but also as an additional
means of social control. Members of the economic elite were often
pampered by the political elite to ensure a continued mutuality of
interests, especially in the repression of “have-not” citizens.

10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated. Since organized labor was
seen as the one power center that could challenge the political hegemony
of the ruling elite and its corporate allies, it was inevitably crushed
or made powerless. The poor formed an underclass, viewed with suspicion
or outright contempt. Under some regimes, being poor was considered akin
to a vice.

11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts. Intellectuals
and the inherent freedom of ideas and expression associated with them
were anathema to these regimes. Intellectual and academic freedom were
considered subversive to national security and the patriotic ideal.
Universities were tightly controlled; politically unreliable faculty
harassed or eliminated. Unorthodox ideas or expressions of dissent were
strongly attacked, silenced, or crushed. To these regimes, art and
literature should serve the national interest or they had no right to exist.

12. Obsession with crime and punishment. Most of these regimes
maintained Draconian systems of criminal justice with huge prison
populations. The police were often glorified and had almost unchecked
power, leading to rampant abuse. “Normal” and political crime were often
merged into trumped-up criminal charges and sometimes used against
political opponents of the regime. Fear, and hatred, of criminals or
“traitors” was often promoted among the population as an excuse for more
police power.

13. Rampant cronyism and corruption. Those in business circles and close
to the power elite often used their position to enrich themselves. This
corruption worked both ways; the power elite would receive financial
gifts and property from the economic elite, who in turn would gain the
benefit of government favoritism. Members of the power elite were in a
position to obtain vast wealth from other sources as well: for example,
by stealing national resources. With the national security apparatus
under control and the media muzzled, this corruption was largely
unconstrained and not well understood by the general population.

14. Fraudulent elections. Elections in the form of plebiscites or public
opinion polls were usually bogus. When actual elections with candidates
were held, they would usually be perverted by the power elite to get the
desired result. Common methods included maintaining control of the
election machinery, intimidating and disenfranchising opposition voters,
destroying or disallowing legal votes, and, as a last resort, turning to
a judiciary beholden to the power elite.

Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is
America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a constitution, a
free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly
being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these are
just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not.

And you rubes, democrats and republicans alike bought into it, and are
still buying into it, hook, line and sinker. I didn't. I spoke up.

I protested. I dissented. We all know what happens to dissenters.

Good luck! You'll need it. Prayer is so ineffective.