A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

If You Could Cause Someone to Land on the Moon Tomorrow by Sending NASA $5 Today, Would You Do it?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old August 6th 10, 04:45 PM posted to sci.space.policy,alt.politics
Val Kraut
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 329
Default If You Could Cause Someone to Land on the Moon Tomorrow by Sending NASA $5 Today, Would You Do it?


"Sure, it's worthwhile. Unlike the untold trillions spent in the U.S.
on various forms of welfare that just results in more of them
breeding, needing more welfare, which cuts into productivity and other
programs. However, they should NOT have wasted $150B on the space
station, it killed planetary exploration."

Given the complexity and timeline of space station activities it seems
really strange that even someone like me who is a fan of manned space can't
name one thing that's been done there that benefitted anybody. When there's
an argument about it's cost I usually post a request for one grand
accomplishment - we were promised many - other than the mythical super
salmonella strain that could be bred there (Is this a good idea? - read the
Andromeda Strain), I get zero answers. Lots of people think we have to keep
it going - What will we get back? - Again I've never heard anything except -
we're now at a point when paybacks will start. Really. NASA had requests out
for proposals for research on the ISS - so maybe they don't know either. I
can't help but think it will never be more that a Political Science
experiment gone wrong that's taken on a life if it's own. The shuttle was
supposed to make access to space cheap and rapid. I have a copy of a US
Senate letter that projected $10Million per launch, 2 week turnaround, 50
launches a year. OK that was 1980 dollars - but now we have 4 month plus
turn around, $650 Million per launch. (Just to put reality in that increase
consider a car that cost $5,000 in 1980 costing $325,000 now - it's not just
inflation) The shuttle was a bad path - the technology just wasn't ready and
the space station kept it alive. And is still keeping it alive. It's a shame
Apollo Applications was cancelled in favor of this route. If you dig out the
old plans you'll find - semi permanent lunarbases, Lunar reconnisance
orbiters, manned venus flybys, deeper space missions etc. All based on the
Saturn V and modified Apollo hardware like the Block 4 Command Module.
(Block 2 went to the moon).


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SADLY, WE'RE HAIR TODAY BUT GONE TOMORROW -- Michael Jackson SwanSong God_Bliss_Ed_Conrad Astronomy Misc 0 July 7th 09 02:19 PM
A THOUGHT FOR TOMORROW (Be Sure You Read This Today) Bob Ward Astronomy Misc 1 January 3rd 09 08:04 PM
THOUGHT FOR TOMORROW (Be Sure to Read This Today) Ed Conrad Astronomy Misc 1 January 22nd 07 03:54 AM
--- THOUGHT FOR TOMORROW (Please read today) --- Ed Conrad Amateur Astronomy 2 September 2nd 06 10:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.