|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Model of Electron (Quark/Lepton) by Tony Lance Dip.Math.(Open) MMXVII
The Outlandish Particle Periodic Table (Particle Key)
4740 experimental, derived, modified and paired particle dataset Key to Particle Numbers and Modifications (see link) http://www.bigberthathing.com/partkey.html Ten Caveats:- 1. Three equations out of nineteen. 2. Ten structures out of 2718. 3. Quad precision instead of slide rule. 4. Error Margin 4 MeV set to .00000035 MeV. 5. Base number 450 US trillion instead of 1450 US trillion. 6. Half CERN results modified. 7. Every particle has a pair like Neutron less than Proton pair. 8. This is Pure Mathematics on slide-rule results. 9. Applied Mathematics Particle classification system already. 10.Might need arbitrary precision instead of quad precision. NB somebody wants citation of CERN experimental results. http://www.bigberthathing.com/CERNfull.html ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++ On Thursday, 27 July 2017 22:01:26 UTC+1, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: It is a 50 year scientific project. This is year 51. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Model of Electron (Quark/Lepton) by Tony Lance Dip.Math.(Open) MMXVII
Tony Lance wrote:
The Outlandish Particle Periodic Table (Particle Key) 4740 experimental, derived, modified and paired particle dataset Key to Particle Numbers and Modifications (see link) http://www.bigberthathing.com/partkey.html Ten Caveats:- 1. Three equations out of nineteen. 2. Ten structures out of 2718. 3. Quad precision instead of slide rule. So false precision, then. 4. Error Margin 4 MeV set to .00000035 MeV. More false precision. 5. Base number 450 US trillion instead of 1450 US trillion. 6. Half CERN results modified. So half the actual data is distorted. 7. Every particle has a pair like Neutron less than Proton pair. 8. This is Pure Mathematics on slide-rule results. No, it isn't. It is pure bull****. 9. Applied Mathematics Particle classification system already. 10.Might need arbitrary precision instead of quad precision. Because you haven't distorted the accuracy of the actual data enough already? -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Model of Electron (Quark/Lepton) by Tony Lance Dip.Math.(Open) MMXVII
Big Table using pure mathematics. (see link below)
This cannot be done using only CERN experimental results. It relies on the classical conjecture that a neutron plus a positron is equal to a proton. All neutral particles have been reduced by .2% All particles with no known charge have been taken as both. The positive charge has same mass and the neutral charge has the reduction. Neither generates a pair, but can only do so with a separate particle. These rules generate the smallpairs table. The error margin is nominal in place of the slide rule accuracy of the CERN results. The above indicates that all particles have a pair. The above rules and giving all particles a pair derives 4741 particles from the 1000 experimental results of CERN. The software has been updated to version 5 and has no glass ceiling. It is ready to run using only the input files particle.dat and particle.txt Output file electron.lst for option 1 and particle.lst for option 2 need to be renamed or deleted prior to each run. The first four answers to option 1 are 3, 4000, 2 and 9. Option 3 has 5 answers;- minus goes back one, plus goes forward 20, even goes back to first, quit exits this particle and more looks at next page of this particle. For type 88 reduce the error margin and for type 99 increase the error margin. The range is affected by adjustments to the first error margin in the two dat and txt files and subsequent error margins within them. http://www.bigberthathing.com/OUTfirm.html 3.5d-06 down to 1.0d-06 down to 7.0d-07 down to 3.5d-07 OUTfull 4000 v5 449938097129016 NB Citation for CERN Monte Carlo particle numbering system, one of three, the other two are for analysis. I drew a picture. http://www.bigberthathing.com/montecarlo.png ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++ On Saturday, 29 July 2017 05:43:38 UTC+1, Fred J. McCall wrote: Tony Lance wrote: The Outlandish Particle Periodic Table (Particle Key) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Before Angkor Wat 5000 years ago by Tony Lance 23 min | Tony Lance[_13_] | Misc | 0 | January 16th 15 10:32 PM |
Before Angkor Wat 5000 years ago by Tony Lance 23 min | Tony Lance[_13_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 16th 15 10:31 PM |
Before Angkor Wat 5000 years ago by Tony Lance 23 min | Tony Lance[_13_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 16th 15 10:31 PM |
New Math Museum To Hopefully Open | nightbat[_1_] | Misc | 0 | June 14th 11 08:02 AM |
Gravity Emergent from ODLRO Inflation Field out of Standard Quark-Lepton-GaugeBoson False Vacuum | Jack Sarfatti | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 29th 06 05:13 PM |