|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudonyms, deceit and dirty tricks.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudonyms, deceit and dirty tricks.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci...25f4a31?hl=en#
I should have given you all the address of the thread. - Ian Parker |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudonyms, deceit and dirty tricks.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudonyms, deceit and dirty tricks.
Ian Parker wrote: Deirdre Sholto Douglas E mail address is This is an Argonne National Laboratory E-mail address. The E-mail given in the thread is Heaven forfend! I have a professional and personal life... who'd thunk it? I don't think we have the same person. I checked though the profile of this "bint Al-kalb" I find she is interested in Gaelic culture, "Gaelic" culture? Um...no, lackwit, I'm not. I'm a lowlander and don't much care about the Gaels. politics and military matters. You don't grasp the concept of "crosspost", do you? No interest whatsoever in biochemistry. I guess that would be because if I want to discuss Real Science I have multiple buildings of Real Scientists to discuss it with and don't have to rely on USENET. Do yourself a flavor and shut up before you truly remove all doubt as to your recto-cranial inversion. Is the poster a woman? I would rather doubt it for this reason. Women, and this includes teenage girls, do not on the whole tell dirty jokes. Uh-oh...Ian, dear, too much information. We really didn't need to know you're still a virgin. It's clear you don't know many women and I hope you stay away from teen- aged girls...you do know what the term "jailbait" refers to, do you not? The work she is doing in fact depends on Synchrotron Radiation. It is about the structure of biological organisms. Only a synchrotron can produce a bright source of soft X rays. The Argonne National Laboratory has got such a facility. The work the "real" person is doing is not remotely military. It is simply using "big science" facilities. Duh. Have you a point besides the one on your head? I am posting this in sci.physics.relativity No, you're not, but that's okay, Ian...we don't have high expec- tations for your capabilities anyway. So, where's that abstract of your most recent publication? Deirdre |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudonyms, deceit and dirty tricks.
On Feb 24, 5:07*am, Ian Parker wrote:
.... A number of people are posting against the theory. *What* theory? That you feel you are being picked on by a single person with multiple nyms? I think this example shows that a few people richly endowed with pseudonyms can appear a very much larger group. I feel that Google should go deeper into this question of pseudonyms .... This is fun, where there is an intent to deceive firm action should be taken. You are deceiving everyone that you are conscious when you post, apparently. You make reference to a theory, yet you spend the entire post talking about one responder. If you've got something to say, stick to the point. How incensed you are about a half dozen other things does not matter on any of the newsgroups you have regurgitated onto. David A. Smith |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudonyms, deceit and dirty tricks.
On 24 Feb, 15:23, dlzc wrote:
On Feb 24, 5:07*am, Ian Parker wrote: ... A number of people are posting against the theory. *What* theory? *That you feel you are being picked on by a single person with multiple nyms? I think this example shows that a few people richly endowed with pseudonyms can appear a very much larger group. I feel that Google should go deeper into this question of pseudonyms ... This is fun, where there is an intent to deceive firm action should be taken. You are deceiving everyone that you are conscious when you post, apparently. *You make reference to a theory, yet you spend the entire post talking about one responder. If you've got something to say, stick to the point. *How incensed you are about a half dozen other things does not matter on any of the newsgroups you have regurgitated onto. Well for a start the Einstein Hoax posters are very much of this type. I think there is a real point. Fred is attemting to stifle all discussion in sci.space.policy. I think he has been largely successful in this. The problem is that his ugly mug emerges in other groups too. Am I making too much of a fuss about one individual. I do not think so. He has started his infestation elsewhere. I believe that all unmoderated groups are at potential risk. What happenned and what has escalated is that I am a bit of an enthusiast about AI. Fred says that AI is totally insane quite forgeting that the Pentagon is deeply involved in AI too. What in fact triggered this latest round of vituperation is that there was a thread intoduced by Martha Adams on the future of human spaceflight. I posted saying (and giving references) that any view of the future had to take into account what people like Kurtzweil was saying. Fred accused me of being insane. Problem was that a few days later came an announcement that NASA had in fact signed up to the "Singularity University" and that the brass of NASA were saying that new technology was needed if NASA was to achieve its goals. One would have thought this would have shut him up but no. Deirdre then started up and sallied forth. Saying I was arrogant, how nice to be always right etc. etc. Consistently refusing to discuss any real issues. Fred and sidekick are NOT just two posters. They are pasrt of a concerted disinformation campaign. This campaign includes the Einstein Hoax. They are both out on a limb. In this latest thread they are BOTH guilty of identity theft. They are in short professional disinformers. This is something that threatens ALL unmoderated groups. I sometimes feel that the days of the completely unmoderated group may be drawing to a close. This identity theft is a serious matter. I am going to write to the REAL Deirdre telling her of the situation. - Ian Parker |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudonyms, deceit and dirty tricks.
Ian Parker wrote: On 24 Feb, 15:23, dlzc wrote: This identity theft is a serious matter. I am going to write to the REAL Deirdre telling her of the situation. I can hardly wait. Deirdre |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Possible identity theft
Happy, now? By the way, how you can look at that website and come up with "extracting" uranium is beyond me. The point of the exercise is to microbially reduce and immobilise soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV). Bioremediation of radionuclides, Ian...not mining. Deirdre --------------------------------- Ian,* I thank you for your concern wrt to identity theft...I assure you my identity has not been stolen. *To that*end, I will be* happy to repost this email..both your original missive and* my reply...on the thread*in question from*my personal email* account in order to allay your concerns. While I appreciate your interest in me, I would like to*state* that I draw a line between my*USENET postings*and my* professional life...I would be grateful if, in future,*you make* an effort not to cross it again. * Thank you. Deirdre Sholto-Douglas Molecular Environmental Science Group Biosciences Division Argonne National Laboratory On Feb 24, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Ian Parker wrote: I am writing to you about a possible case of identity theft. http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci...536dc510ffc4c0 I would first of all like to ask you whether you are the Deirdre Sholto Douglas who is posing in this thread. I do not believe for one moment that you are. I think you ought to know though that your name is being used in this way. What action you take is, of course, up to you. I think though your good name should be important to you. I feel too I should tell you where I am coming from. I am a retired mathematician with a strong interest in Artificial Intelligence. I have always felt that the future of the space program lies in unmanned exploration and in improving the quality of AI. This was howled down by various people in sci.space.policy. As well as attacking my theories they made a lot of personal remarks about me. Recently NASA has in fact endorsed this position. NASA (along with Google) has teamed up with Kurtzwel in the shape of the "Singularity University". This in fact offers a whole range of technologies, focussed on AI, but also including such things as nanotech. I have looked at your website. One thing hit me in the eye. Uranium and its biological extraction. I would like to ask you another question - "What about Platinum?" Would it be possible, in your view, to extract Platinum biologically? This is one of the things which I think the new NASA brass are after. When the dinosaurs became extinct a layer of Iridium was deposited and asteroids are rich (in comparison with the Earth's crust) in platinoids. This by the way is one of the reasons why it can't be you. You I am sure would have mentioned the work on Uranium. * * - Ian Parker |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudonyms, deceit and dirty tricks.
"Ian Parker" wrote in message
... STOP POSTING THIS CRAP TO SCI.SPACE.POLICY! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudonyms, deceit and dirty tricks.
On Feb 24, 8:23*am, dlzc wrote:
On Feb 24, 5:07*am, Ian Parker wrote: ... A number of people are posting against the theory. *What* theory? *That you feel you are being picked on by a single person with multiple nyms? I think this example shows that a few people richly endowed with pseudonyms can appear a very much larger group. I feel that Google should go deeper into this question of pseudonyms ... This is fun, where there is an intent to deceive firm action should be taken. You are deceiving everyone that you are conscious when you post, apparently. *You make reference to a theory, yet you spend the entire post talking about one responder. He wrote: "am posting this in sci.physics.relativity for the following reason. A number of people are posting against the theory." He has rights to post his thoughts. You doubt so on all counts. 92 percent of the UK population voted against the Iraq war. That number moved toward 100 percent over time, that number is 99.9 percent currently. 0.1 percent of the population are against control, SIEGE and racism. I have spoken. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
study maths tricks for free new - updated | studymathstricks | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 22nd 08 06:33 AM |
internet tricks and tips | reshma | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 17th 07 03:58 AM |
A thread on Camping & neat tricks | TBerk | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | April 14th 07 04:24 AM |
[fitsbits] stupid shell tricks | Steve Allen | FITS | 0 | October 23rd 06 10:47 PM |
Balettie Caught in Web of 51-L Deceit | Richard Henry | Space Shuttle | 4 | August 18th 03 12:32 AM |