A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

dozens good and rational suggestions for the Human Space FlightPlans Committee in my new ghostNASA article



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 19th 09, 07:18 PM posted to sci.space.policy
gaetanomarano
external usenet poster
 
Location: Italy
Posts: 493
Default dozens good and rational suggestions for the Human Space FlightPlans Committee in my new ghostNASA article

--
--
now and in the next weeks, you'll find dozens good and rational
suggestions for the Human Space Flight Plans Committee in my new
ghostNASA article: http://ow.ly/f3vQ
--
--
  #2  
Old June 19th 09, 10:41 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Me
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 489
Default More gaetanomarano BS

On Jun 19, 2:18*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
--
--
now and in the next weeks, you'll find dozens good and rational
suggestions for the Human Space Flight Plans Committee in my new
ghostNASA article:http://ow.ly/f3vQ
--


more garbage


  #3  
Old June 22nd 09, 07:27 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Eric Chomko[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,853
Default More gaetanomarano BS

On Jun 19, 5:41*pm, Me wrote:
On Jun 19, 2:18*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:

--
--
now and in the next weeks, you'll find dozens good and rational
suggestions for the Human Space Flight Plans Committee in my new
ghostNASA article:http://ow.ly/f3vQ
--


more garbage


Again, right or wrong, he isn't going to win any contracts. So, what
good are his opinions?
  #4  
Old June 23rd 09, 12:44 AM posted to sci.space.policy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default dozens good and rational suggestions for the Human SpaceFlight Plans Committee in my new ghostNASA article

On Jun 19, 11:18*am, gaetanomarano wrote:
--
--
now and in the next weeks, you'll find dozens good and rational
suggestions for the Human Space Flight Plans Committee in my new
ghostNASA article:http://ow.ly/f3vQ
--
--


Too bad we can't outsource our NASA think tank to ghostNASA and
William Mook.

~ BG
  #5  
Old June 23rd 09, 01:47 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Me
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 489
Default BS

On Jun 19, 2:18*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
--
--
now and in the next weeks, you'll find dozens good and rational
suggestions for the Human Space Flight Plans Committee in my new
ghostNASA article:http://ow.ly/f3vQ
--
--


  #6  
Old June 23rd 09, 03:17 AM posted to sci.space.policy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default More gaetanomarano BS

On Jun 22, 11:27*am, Eric Chomko wrote:
On Jun 19, 5:41*pm, Me wrote:

On Jun 19, 2:18*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:


--
--
now and in the next weeks, you'll find dozens good and rational
suggestions for the Human Space Flight Plans Committee in my new
ghostNASA article:http://ow.ly/f3vQ
--


more garbage


Again, right or wrong, he isn't going to win any contracts. So, what
good are his opinions?


Look who's speaking. If you were handed the holy grail, you'd first
crap in it and then toss it away.

~ BG
  #7  
Old June 23rd 09, 08:57 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Eric Chomko[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,853
Default More gaetanomarano BS

On Jun 22, 10:17*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 22, 11:27*am, Eric Chomko wrote:

On Jun 19, 5:41*pm, Me wrote:


On Jun 19, 2:18*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:


--
--
now and in the next weeks, you'll find dozens good and rational
suggestions for the Human Space Flight Plans Committee in my new
ghostNASA article:http://ow.ly/f3vQ
--


more garbage


Again, right or wrong, he isn't going to win any contracts. So, what
good are his opinions?


Look who's speaking. *If you were handed the holy grail, you'd first
crap in it and *then toss it away.


Not true. I know the difference between silver and pot metal. I doubt
you do, though. I can see you getting fooled with pyrite again and
again.

Eric
  #8  
Old June 23rd 09, 08:58 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Eric Chomko[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,853
Default dozens good and rational suggestions for the Human SpaceFlight Plans Committee in my new ghostNASA article

On Jun 22, 7:44*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 19, 11:18*am, gaetanomarano wrote:

--
--
now and in the next weeks, you'll find dozens good and rational
suggestions for the Human Space Flight Plans Committee in my new
ghostNASA article:http://ow.ly/f3vQ
--
--


Too bad we can't outsource our NASA think tank to ghostNASA and
William Mook.


Why outsource when you can make a proposal?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
research suggestions for GPS/Galileo engineering/policy article Jim Oberg Policy 1 May 30th 05 09:22 PM
My Scientific American (October) feature article on the upcoming Chinese human space flight is now on line. James Oberg Space Station 28 October 15th 03 02:03 PM
My Scientific American (October) feature article on the upcoming Chinese human space flight is now on line. James Oberg Policy 28 October 15th 03 02:03 PM
My Scientific American (October) feature article on the upcoming Chinese human space flight is now on line. James Oberg History 25 October 15th 03 02:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.