A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center (no Iron???)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 6th 07, 12:01 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center (no Iron???)

If heavy elements go to the bottom than at the bottom of the Earth
should be uranium, gold,lead,iron, chrome etc. True iron would be the
biggest layer,but not at the Earth's center if going by weight. Best to
keep in mind this liquid iron can't be magnetized. No lab can make a
hot melted iron dynamo,nor mother nature. Curie told us this long
ago,and it begs the question. Why have we forgotten this profound Curie
effect that heat destroys a magnetic field I have a better theory
on Earth''s magnetic field Bert

  #2  
Old May 7th 07, 11:43 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Scott Miller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 438
Default Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center (no Iron???)

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
If heavy elements go to the bottom than at the bottom of the Earth
should be uranium, gold,lead,iron, chrome etc. True iron would be the
biggest layer,but not at the Earth's center if going by weight. Best to
keep in mind this liquid iron can't be magnetized. No lab can make a
hot melted iron dynamo,nor mother nature. Curie told us this long
ago,and it begs the question. Why have we forgotten this profound Curie
effect that heat destroys a magnetic field I have a better theory
on Earth''s magnetic field Bert


Though the core of the Earth may contain many heavy elements, iron is
the more common and likely dominates the core material. Nickle as well
likely resides there.

As to its nature, both by physical chemistry principles and measurements
using seismic waves, the central core is thought to be solid while the
outer core is liquid. Liquid iron in motion constitutes a current and
currents produce magnetic fields. That is the basis of the dynamo
principle applied to the formation of the Earth's magnetic field.
Likely not complete but it accounts for observations.

  #3  
Old May 7th 07, 01:10 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center (no Iron???)

Scott It is weight(density) that goes to the bottom not volume.
uranium,gold lead,may not be as plentiful(should be more plentiful at
the bottom than at the surface) as iron but they are heavier. So that
makes again your thinking off. Best to keep in mind at the exact center
of the Earth there is little motion. Bert PS I met one on one with
Einstein,

  #4  
Old May 7th 07, 01:14 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center (no Iron???)

Scott Show me a lab that has a liquid iron dynamo. Bert

  #5  
Old May 8th 07, 01:10 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center (no Iron???)

Scott So far you have the Earth's core of iron and nickel. Why do you
leave out uranium,gold,lead,and other heavy elements? Please give a
scientific reason in your own words.Best to keep in mind "cream floats
to the top" When you give your answer have "bouncy" in it. Buoyant is
a very strong up force Bert

  #7  
Old May 8th 07, 02:11 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center (no Iron???)

On May 8, 5:29 am, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote:
In article ,
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Scott So far you have the Earth's core of iron and nickel. Why do you
leave out uranium,gold,lead,and other heavy elements? Please give a
scientific reason in your own words.Best to keep in mind "cream floats
to the top" When you give your answer have "bouncy" in it. Buoyant is
a very strong up force Bert


http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/GG/ASK/e...mposition.html

--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.

COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).



"Recent speculation suggests that the innermost part of the core is
enriched in very heavy elements, trans-cesium elements (above atomic
number 55), this would include gold, mercury and uranium."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_of_the_Earth

Double-A





  #8  
Old May 8th 07, 02:17 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Phineas T Puddleduck[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,121
Default Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center (no Iron???)

In article .com,
Double-A wrote:

"Recent speculation suggests that the innermost part of the core is
enriched in very heavy elements, trans-cesium elements (above atomic
number 55), this would include gold, mercury and uranium."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_of_the_Earth

Double-A



*speculation*

from Wootton, Anne (September 2006) "Earth's Inner Fort Knox" Discover 27(9):
p.18;

--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.

COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).
  #9  
Old May 8th 07, 02:35 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center (no Iron???)

On May 8, 6:17 am, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote:
In article .com,

Double-A wrote:
"Recent speculation suggests that the innermost part of the core is
enriched in very heavy elements, trans-cesium elements (above atomic
number 55), this would include gold, mercury and uranium."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_of_the_Earth


Double-A


*speculation*

from Wootton, Anne (September 2006) "Earth's Inner Fort Knox" Discover 27(9):
p.18;

--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.

COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).



Full reference:

"Earth's Inner Fort Knox [Earth's core has 1.6 quadrillion tons of
gold]
Discover magazine ^ | September 2006 | Anne Wootton

Searching for a pot of gold? Try the center of the Earth.

More than 99 percent of Earth's gold is missing-it all sank to the
center of the planet billions of years ago. In fact, says geologist
Bernard Wood of Macquarie University in Australia, there's enough gold
in Earth's core to coat its surface in 1.5 feet of the stuff. How did
it get there?

Earth formed from a series of smaller planetesimals that crashed
together over the course of 30 million to 40 million years. Wood
deduced how much gold ought to be present in Earth's crust by
comparing the crust's composition to that of meteorites similar to the
planetesimals. He concluded that the crust was depleted of gold,
platinum, and nickel and suggests that all these iron-loving elements
were pulled into Earth's iron-rich core while its surface was still an
ocean of molten magma.

In fact, if meteorites hadn't later deposited gold on Earth's surface
millions of years after its core had fully formed and its crust had
cooled, gold would be even more rare and expensive than it is today.
Wood has calculated that 1.6 quadrillion tons of gold must lie in
Earth's core. This may sound like a lot, but it is really only a tiny
percentage of the core's overall mass-about one part per million. The
core holds six times as much platinum, Wood notes, "but people get
less excited about that than gold.""

Note: Geologist Bernard Wood of Macquarie University in Australia.

Or maybe this is more your speed:

http://www.literature.org/authors/bu...e-earths-core/

Double-A





  #10  
Old May 8th 07, 02:40 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Phineas T Puddleduck[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,121
Default Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center (no Iron???)

In article .com,
Double-A wrote:

Full reference:

"Earth's Inner Fort Knox [Earth's core has 1.6 quadrillion tons of
gold]
Discover magazine ^ | September 2006 | Anne Wootton

Searching for a pot of gold? Try the center of the Earth.

More than 99 percent of Earth's gold is missing-it all sank to the
center of the planet billions of years ago. In fact, says geologist
Bernard Wood of Macquarie University in Australia, there's enough gold
in Earth's core to coat its surface in 1.5 feet of the stuff. How did
it get there?

Earth formed from a series of smaller planetesimals that crashed
together over the course of 30 million to 40 million years. Wood
deduced how much gold ought to be present in Earth's crust by
comparing the crust's composition to that of meteorites similar to the
planetesimals. He concluded that the crust was depleted of gold,
platinum, and nickel and suggests that all these iron-loving elements
were pulled into Earth's iron-rich core while its surface was still an
ocean of molten magma.

In fact, if meteorites hadn't later deposited gold on Earth's surface
millions of years after its core had fully formed and its crust had
cooled, gold would be even more rare and expensive than it is today.
Wood has calculated that 1.6 quadrillion tons of gold must lie in
Earth's core. This may sound like a lot, but it is really only a tiny
percentage of the core's overall mass-about one part per million. The
core holds six times as much platinum, Wood notes, "but people get
less excited about that than gold.""

Note: Geologist Bernard Wood of Macquarie University in Australia.

Or maybe this is more your speed:

http://www.literature.org/authors/bu...e-earths-core/

Double-A



Still speculation. Note the lack of support for the position,as in there seems
to be little support for it in the peer-reviewed publications. Even your
pathetic (which is to be expected, as its you AA) dig doesn't change that.

--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.

COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hole in Solid Iron exact gravitational Center G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 99 May 16th 07 06:20 AM
An Iron Sun? Double-A Misc 24 July 14th 05 12:18 AM
Corrugated Iron Observatory Steve - www.ukspeedtraps.co.uk UK Astronomy 1 September 5th 04 11:36 PM
Any old iron Dr DNA UK Astronomy 14 March 14th 04 10:56 PM
Iron and the Stars J. Scott Miller Misc 4 July 5th 03 07:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.