Another Error of Einstein: The Calculation of Starlight Bending

On Sep 13, 1:27 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

Nice try, but your error is in

ARCS = pi * (360 * 60 *60)

It should be

ARCS = 2 * pi * (360 * 60 *60)

You see Meda, I told you that you can't impress people
more stupid than yourself, because there simply aren't any.
Kooobee is only slightly less stupid than you are. Even he
knowns how to calculate the circumference of a circle.
At this side of the Atlantic we learn this at the age of 10.

Well, even dumber than yours truly was that nitwit Einstein. His
prediction of photon deflection was totally hand-waving without any
mathematical bases where one Newtonian contribution came from the
metric element of g_00, and another one came from the element g_11.
Some Einstein-worshipper would call Einstein a genius. However, the
ones who truly understand the mathematics involved would call
Einstein's claim a mere lucky claim. shrug To this day, there is
still not a published work of mathematics that conclusively shows the
twice Newtonian deflection with meticulous attention paid to the ever
so minute differences in the boundary conditions. They were all hand-
waving and BS in nature.

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:52:05 -0000, Koobee Wublee
wrote:

On Sep 13, 1:27 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

Nice try, but your error is in

ARCS = pi * (360 * 60 *60)

It should be

ARCS = 2 * pi * (360 * 60 *60)

You see Meda, I told you that you can't impress people
more stupid than yourself, because there simply aren't any.
Kooobee is only slightly less stupid than you are. Even he
knowns how to calculate the circumference of a circle.
At this side of the Atlantic we learn this at the age of 10.

Well, even dumber than yours truly was that nitwit Einstein.

Then it should be easy for you to get a Nobel prize.

[...]

On Sep 13, 11:52 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
To this day, there is still not a published work of mathematics that conclusively shows the twice Newtonian deflection with meticulous
attention paid to the ever so minute differences in the boundary
conditions. They were all hand-waving and BS in nature.

Coming from you, the above is really laughable, like everything else
you post :-)