|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Sep 30, 6:31*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Sep 29, 12:20*pm, BradGuth wrote: It seems our weak force of gravity attraction to the Sirius star/solar system is obviously so much greater than say icy Sedna, and yet others here keep insisting that we're not in the least bit gravity tidal associated to that impressive star system. *What gives? Sirius and us(our solar system) are very much indeed inseparable, at least according to those regular laws of physics pertaining to the mainstream accepted notions of Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics that seems more than sufficient for everything else we’re told to accept, and especially if little Sedna can be turned around at a tidal radii of 1.459e14 m that’s worth merely 2.975e13 N, whereas Sirius at 8.6 light years and worth 1.417e17 N (20 thousand fold stronger tidal radii), and to think that we’ve been gaining on this 3.5 solar mass of Sirius by 7.6 km/sec, plus most likely and unavoidably accelerating towards our next close cosmological encounter. However, it’s pretty much all nothing but another mainstream infowar, of media damage-control by way of a mainstream tactical disinformation gauntlet of carefully orchestrated lies and conditional physics, plus deceptions and systematic obfuscation is apparently what it’s all about. *When I’ve merely expected of others to share information and to otherwise constructively ponder and contribute to this topic and many similar ones before, all we ever got at best was a stone cold shoulder, and otherwise mostly negativity and banishment, as well as from a certain racist and kosher bigotry spouting potty-mouth rabbi none the less. *However, the laws of physics are seldom if ever politically correct or otherwise faith-based, and as such they simply do not lie, and even the best available science doesn’t support many of those established mainstream notions of excluding anything and everything that rocks a given faith-based boat. Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius) *http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm *http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/ca...alculator.html The cosmic molecular cloud of what created Sirius, as being worth at least 1.25e6 solar masses, while at a center to center distance of 100 ly and using our solar system mass of 2.05e30 kg for that same era, we get the following results for 100 ly (9.46053e17 m), 50 ly (4.7303e17 m) and 10 ly (9.46053e16 m). *2.05e30 kg *and *2.5e36 kg *at 100 ly = 3.819e20 Newtons *2.05e30 kg *and *2.5e36 kg *at * 50 ly = 1.528e21 N *2.05e30 kg *and *2.5e36 kg *at * 10 ly = 3.819e22 N current (sun ~ earth) gravitational force of attraction: *1.989e30 and 5.974e24 kg at 1.496e11 m = 3.541e22 N current (sun ~ mars) gravitational force of attraction: *1.989e30 and 6.418e23 kg at 2.2794e11 m = 1.639e21 N current (sun ~ pluto) gravitational force of attraction: *1.989e30 and 1.305e22 kg at 5.906e12 m = 4.964e16 N current (solar system) ~ Sedna/average gravitational attraction: *2.02e30 and 4.7e21 kg at 7.867e13 m = 1.023e14 N current (solar system) ~ Sedna/aphelion gravitational attraction: *2.02e30 and 4.7e21 kg at 1.459e14 m = 2.975e13 N current (solar system) ~ Sirius gravitational force of attraction: *2.02e30 and 6.9615e30 kg at 8.1365e16 m = 1.417e17 N Not to further nitpick, however there’s also 2005-VX3 / damocloid (asteroid) of 112 km diameter as perhaps worth at most 1.47e18 kg, that’s hanging all the way out to 2275.5 AU (3.4e14 m) that’s worth merely 1.71e9 N, and even it’s not going away from our solar system's tidal radius. *That’s representing a Sirius/XV3 ratio of nearly 83e6:1 greater tidal radii hold on us, not to mention that we seem to be headed back towards Sirius at 7.6 km/s and unavoidably accelerating, exactly as any elliptical Newtonian orbital trek should. Being that a molecular cloud that's worthy of perhaps at the very least 1.25e6 solar masses is going to have a diameter of nearly 100 light years, as such I might suggest that we use the 50 ly parameter for the adjusted distance from the core density of such a molecular cloud, as for mutually binding into us at the weak gravity force of 1.528e21 N. *Of course by doubling that distance cuts this tidal binding force of radial gravitational attraction down to a forth, whereas even at 500 ly it’s still worthy of 1.528e19 N, and at the 1.25e7 solar masses brings that 500 ly distance right back up to being worth 1.528e20 N. The cosmic creation of the Sirius star/solar system was by no means any small matter of a wussy little molecular cloud. *This was an extremely large cloud and subsequent nearby stellar birthing event of relatively recent times (250~300 MBP), and as such it would have been something entirely visible to the naked human eyes of that era (not that any intelligent human via Darwin or intelligent proto-design of humans even existed at that time, although Ed Conrad’s “Man of Coal” seems to be within that era), and as of most recently transforming the red supergiant phase of Sirius B into a white dwarf required a substantial helium flashover (slow nova) about as close as you can safely get, if not a little too close. By way of reading from what others claiming to know more than most anyone else (must be Einstein clones), it seems they’d have no problems with suggesting the 1e6:1 cosmic molecular cloud ratio of having been worth 1.25e7 solar masses that created the Sirius star/ solar system, and if still using 2.05e30 kg mass for that of our solar system of that same era results in yet another 10 fold increased force of attraction for that same 50 ly distance, representing 1.528e22 N (nearly half of the sun~earth attraction), and 99.9999% of this 1e6:1 molecular cloud that’s oddly nowhere to be found, by rights should have greatly affected our solar system. Try to remember that this wasn’t a one brief kind of a cosmic drive-by shooting, but most likely worth at least a million years of persistent gravity pull before that massive molecular cloud ever having cranked out those impressive Sirius stars, and for at least another million some odd years of having blown everything else (99.999% of that molecular cloud) far away. *Once again, how can this kind of nearby cosmic event and of such horrific original mass not have affected our solar system? This one about our being unavoidably attracted and tidal influenced via the impressive Sirius star/solar system shouldn’t be so hard to answer, but then our resident wizards seem rather unable, and/or unwilling to share and share alike without involving a great deal of their kosher mainstream damage-control of obfuscation and if need be bloodshed. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” The ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system remains attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than 2005-VX3 / damocloid (asteroid) of 112 km diameter is attracted to our sun. *This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just another Newtonian matter of fact that you can take to the bank. The Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll) are most likely still in charge of what drives the global environment, as least to a much greater extent than given credit by those of us in charge of what the general public ever gets to learn about. All that I'm suggesting at this point is that our solar system and that of our frail terrestrial environment that's currently thawing us out remains linked by tidal gravity forces and UV illumination to the relatively massive Sirius star system, and otherwise we're unavoidably affected by the 2e20N/sec of tidal forces associated with holding onto that physically massive and otherwise dark moon of ours. There's a slim chance that Earth ever belonged to Sirius B, though we have a much greater odds of our moon/Selene and the planet Venus were once part of that Sirius B solar system before it went nova (helium flashover) and reverted down to that little white dwarf. As further proof that I'm more often right than not, just have a look at my kosher shadows of rabbi Saul and his lovechild Hagar. As why otherwise would they be trying so hard at applying their Zionist/Nazi methods of topic/author stalking and bashings upon anyone that doesn't agree with their version of the Old Testament and their subsequent unpoliced faith-based policies? ~ BG |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
Not to continually nitpick, however there’s also 2005-VX3 / damocloid
(asteroid) of 112 km diameter as perhaps worth at most 1.47e18 kg, that’s hanging all the way out to 2275.5 AU (3.4e14 m) that’s worth merely 1.71e9 N, and even it’s not going away from our solar system's tidal radius grip. That’s representing a Sirius/XV3 ratio of nearly 83e6:1 greater tidal radii hold on us, not to mention that we seem to be headed back towards Sirius at 7.6 km/s and unavoidably accelerating, exactly as any elliptical Newtonian orbital trek should. That interstellar Newtonian tidal association that's 8.3e7:1 greater than represented by the 2005-VX3 / damocloid(asteroid), as such is not hardly insignificant. There's simply no reasonable way of others arguing that our solar system has not been dominated by that nearby Sirius star/solar system. ~ BG On Sep 21, 7:02*am, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough matter associated within a given star/solar system to affect another star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass is sufficiently nearby and already heading towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Oct 4, 3:27*pm, BradGuth wrote:
Not to continually nitpick, however there’s also 2005-VX3 / damocloid (asteroid) of 112 km diameter as perhaps worth at most 1.47e18 kg, that’s hanging all the way out to 2275.5 AU (3.4e14 m) that’s worth merely 1.71e9 N, and even it’s not going away from our solar system's tidal radius grip. *That’s representing a Sirius/XV3 ratio of nearly 83e6:1 greater tidal radii hold on us, not to mention that we seem to be headed back towards Sirius at 7.6 km/s and unavoidably accelerating, exactly as any elliptical Newtonian orbital trek should. That interstellar Newtonian tidal association that's 8.3e7:1 greater force than represented by the 2005-VX3 / damocloid(asteroid), as such is not hardly insignificant. There's simply no reasonable way of others arguing that our solar system has not been dominated by that nearby Sirius star/solar system. *~ BG On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough matter associated within a given star/solar system to affect another star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass is sufficiently nearby and already heading towards one another, as the case with us and Sirius. *Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” The Cosmological Ice Ages are pretty much done for, at least as far as any expanding polar ice caps taking us along with our physically dark moon into yet another global deep freeze. However, keep asking yourself, why the Jewish mindset (as represented and otherwise defended by rabbi Saul Levy) is always so gosh darn naysay/opposed to those pesky regular laws of Newtonian and orbital physics. Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” http://www.alaskapublishing.com http://www.guarddogbooks.com |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
Not to continually nitpick, however there’s also 2005-VX3/damocloid
(asteroid) of 112 km diameter as perhaps worth at most 1.47e18 kg, that’s hanging all the way out to 2275.5 AU (3.4e14 m) that’s worth merely 1.71e9 N, and even it’s not going away from our solar system's tidal radius grip. Now that’s representing a Sirius/XV3 ratio of nearly 8.3e7:1 greater tidal radii hold on us, not to mention that we seem to be headed back towards Sirius at 7.6 km/s and unavoidably accelerating, exactly as any elliptical Newtonian orbital trek should. That interstellar Newtonian tidal association that's 8.3e7:1 greater force than represented by the 2005-VX3 / damocloid(asteroid), as such is not hardly insignificant. There's simply no reasonable way of others arguing that our solar system has not been dominated by that nearby Sirius star/solar system. ~ BG On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: "The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough matter associated within a given star/solar system to affect another star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass is sufficiently nearby and already heading towards one another, as the case with us and Sirius, not to mention when that star system was worth 12.5 Ms, and before then a vast molecular cloud worth 12.5e6 Ms. Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Those "Cosmological Ice Ages" are pretty much done for, at least as far as any expanding polar ice caps taking us along with our physically dark moon into yet another global deep freeze. However, keep asking yourself, why the Jewish mindset (as having been officially represented and otherwise defended by rabbi Saul Levy) is always so gosh darn naysay/opposed to those pesky regular laws of Newtonian and orbital physics (as though there's something anti- semitic going on). I can't always speak on behalf of Henry Kroll, but for the most part he has been on the investigative track of deductively understanding our environment and otherwise first hand experiencing the local changes in Alaska weather, and of course noticing the progressive loss of slow ice (glaciers) over his extensive Alaskan lifetime. Kroll is also better informed than most about the various species of humans that seemed to have dropped into our world out of nowhere, and either having failed to survive or simply vanished just as mysteriously. Kroll is also a for real honest to God survivalist, and not just providing for himself but for an entire family plus relatives and multiple friends (some of which might even owe their lives to the honest efforts of Henry), and you've probably eaten some of the fish caught by the Kroll clan, though you should also try their Alaskan moose and bear meat (some of which came right off their front porch). Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” http://www.alaskapublishing.com http://www.guarddogbooks.com |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Oct 5, 10:34*am, BradGuth wrote:
Not to continually nitpick, however there’s also 2005-VX3/damocloid (asteroid) of 112 km diameter as perhaps worth at most 1.47e18 kg, that’s hanging all the way out to 2275.5 AU (3.4e14 m) that’s worth merely 1.71e9 N, and even it’s not going away from our solar system's tidal radius grip. *Now that’s representing a Sirius/XV3 ratio of nearly 8.3e7:1 greater tidal radii hold on us, not to mention that we seem to be headed back towards Sirius at 7.6 km/s and unavoidably accelerating, exactly as any elliptical Newtonian orbital trek should. That interstellar Newtonian tidal association that's 8.3e7:1 greater force than represented by the 2005-VX3 / damocloid(asteroid), as such is not hardly insignificant. * There's simply no reasonable way of others arguing that our solar system has not been dominated by that nearby Sirius star/solar system. *~ BG On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Sep 21, 7:02*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius. Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll) The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3 being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to our sun. This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/ Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except for an inflated price). Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius) http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/ca...alculator.html Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most dominate of trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that are each in proper motion to one another. This however doesn't exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say. ~ BG |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Oct 15, 6:54*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:02*am, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius. Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll) The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3 being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to our sun. *This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/ Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except for an inflated price). Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius) *http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm *http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/ca...alculator.html Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most dominate of trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that are each in proper motion to one another. *This however doesn't exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say. How many planets like Venus did Sirius B originally have? ~ BG |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Oct 17, 1:48*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 15, 6:54*am, BradGuth wrote: On Sep 21, 7:02*am, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
Do those laws of physics really function differently while on the
moon? (according to our Apollo missions, apparently so) As perhaps otherwise something like the newish planet of Venus and even our physically dark Selene/moon that may have belonged to Sirius B, with conceivably our Venus having been what those Dogon implied as Sirius C was perhaps not actually that of any third star, and otherwise the remaining Sirius star system wobble being caused by whatever Sirius D of .057 Ms (roughly 60 Mj) represents their true origin of where the geologically newish Venus and our Selene/moon came from either Sirius B or conceivably Sirius D that may have been a third star. At this juncture we simply have too many unknowns and little if any talent or resources focused upon the nearby Sirius star/solar system, so for the moment there’s no objective proof-positive either way. http://www.icr.org/article/3394/ “Using experimentally-determined diffusion coefficients for hydration of olivine, water diffusion profiles were calculated for all three crystallographic axes of an olivine grain at a temperature of 1245±45ºC for various durations, with an initial water content of ~312 weight parts per million (wt ppm) and a final water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim. Thus it was possible to approximate the ascent rate of the mantle xenoliths and, by extension, their host basalt. The calculated ascent rates ranged from 1.9 hours at 1290ºC to 3.4 hours at 1245ºC and 6.3 hours at 1200ºC. Furthermore, FTIR analyses across cracks in the olivine grains did not exhibit any perturbations of the hydrogen profiles, so hydrogen diffusion from the grain rims occurred predominantly prior to the cracking of the grains near the earth's surface or after the eruption of the host basalt. Therefore, these mantle xenoliths must have reached the earth's surface in a matter of only several hours.” What part of zero ppm (“water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim”) do we still not fully understand, and try to remember that this crystal dry lunar environment is offering a near ideal vacuum, and even originally its surface shouldn’t have offered at most more then 0.1 bar unless it was covered in a thick layer of ice (as otherwise it’s not exactly solid or much less liquid h2o friendly). If there’s any surface basalt as loose rock and dust that contains water, unless it were otherwise deposited by meteors and comets, as such would tend to impose and/or reinforce my ongoing interpretation that our Selene/moon was once upon a time covered by a very thick layer of ice. As otherwise there shouldn’t but few if any ppm worth of water to behold unless going deep, because the element or molecule water needs pressure in order to coexist within basalt, and unfortunately the one common thing our Selene/moon doesn’t offer is pressure. So, unless we’re talking about going several km deep into that thick and robust crust, there’s not going to bel all that much h2o to behold. If our moon were made extensively of Earth, then it’s crust and surface of lose rock and dust should be similar in measurable ways to that of terrestrial basalts. http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/...ract/85/9/1485 “Chlorine, Sulfur, and Water in Magmas and Oceans” However, it seems our currently naked Selene/moon is one of considerable sodium and otherwise saturated and/or deposited in many other unusually dark and heavy elements, including UV reactive minerals, as well as those even heavier elements of radioactive and their unavoidable secondary isotopes. So, where’s the other 99.9% of our spendy LRO and LCROSS science that obviously does not necessarily support our previous Apollo science or mission physics? Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” On Oct 15, 6:54*am, BradGuth wrote: On Sep 21, 7:02*am, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius. Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll) The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3 being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to our sun. *This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/ Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except for an inflated price). Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius) *http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm *http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/ca...alculator.html Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most dominate of the trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that are each in proper motion to one another. *This however doesn't exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say. There's no possibly way we're not dominated by what the nearby and still extremely vibrant Sirius star/solar system represents, much less of what it used to represent before having lost so much of its original mass, and before then of what the molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms represented. ~ BG |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Oct 17, 7:58*am, American wrote:
On Oct 17, 1:48*am, BradGuth wrote: On Oct 15, 6:54*am, BradGuth wrote: On Sep 21, 7:02*am, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius.. Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll) The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3 being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to our sun. *This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/ Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except for an inflated price). Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius) *http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm *http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/ca...alculator.html Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most dominate of trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that are each in proper motion to one another. *This however doesn't exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say. How many planets like Venus did Sirius B originally have? *~ BG- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Correct me if I'm wrong, but according to the legend of the Dogon, given by Dr. Louis Turi: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2006/03/21 The "planetary" star system isn't quite identified as being that of Sirius B, but I am inclined to believe that perhaps, according to story given by: http://www.sirianrevelations.net/star_a_b.shtml "Although the scientific community has not confirmed the existence *of *Sirius C, the Dogon knew of it by the name, Enome Ya, and they *described it too as revolving around Sirius A. *Of the planets that orbited Anu, one did not achieve ascension when *the star, which remains in the fourth dimension, did not: that planet *is Nebiru, the home of the Annunaki. *Nebiru was flung out of Sirius, was captured by our sun, and *ricocheted back to Sirius and it is to this day caught between the *two star systems, on an elliptical journey that takes approximately *3,600 years to complete." American There is a Sirius C, or possibly it's Sirius D because Sirius C turned out as becoming our planet Venus. Whatever is causing the wobble from a 0.057 Ms item is still invisible to most astronomy instruments. It could even turn out being a small neutron star or possibly a black hole, although brown-dwarf or extremely large planet seems more likely. Rogue or elliptical trekking items between our sun and Sirius should also be within the cards of what's technically possible, although the much greater combined Sirius mass will always dominate. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brad Guth is...... | OM | History | 0 | December 26th 03 11:34 PM |