If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




The Obvious Nonsense of Einstein's Relativity
(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)
(A) The speed of light is invariable; then any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a wavelength shift. (B) The wavelength is invariable; then any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a speedoflight shift. (A) is nonsense: John Stachel: "But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair." http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/...relativity.htm "Thus, the moving observer sees a wave possessing the same wavelength [...] but a different frequency [...] to that seen by the stationary observer." http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teachin...ml/node41.html "By observing the two indicator lights, you can see for yourself that, once more, there is a blueshift  the pulse frequency measured at the receiver is somewhat higher than the frequency with which the pulses are sent out. This time, the distances between subsequent pulses are not affected, but still there is a frequency shift." http://www.einsteinonline.info/spotlights/doppler.html "Let's say you, the observer, now move toward the source with velocity Vo. You encounter more waves per unit time than you did before. Relative to you, the waves travel at a higher speed: V' = V+Vo. The frequency of the waves you detect is higher, and is given by: f' = V'/Î» = (V+Vo)/Î»." http://physics.bu.edu/~redner/211sp...9_doppler.html "Vo is the velocity of an observer moving towards the source. This velocity is independent of the motion of the source. Hence, the velocity of waves relative to the observer is c + Vo. [...] The motion of an observer does not alter the wavelength. The increase in frequency is a result of the observer encountering more wavelengths in a given time." http://alevelphysicstutor.com/wavdoppler.php In the next version of fundamental physics the original malignancy, Einstein's 1905 nonsensical axiom "The speed of light is invariable" will be replaced with the correct axiom "The wavelength of light is invariable". I have developed the idea in a series of tweets he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev 
Ads 
#2




The Obvious Nonsense of Einstein's Relativity
Insanity triggered by Einstein's nonsensical constantspeedoflight postulate:
Einsteinians gloriously jump, within a minute of their experienced time, sixty million years ahead in the future, and trap unlimitedly long objects, in a compressed state, inside unlimitedly short containers: Thibault Damour: "The paradigm of the special relativistic upheaval of the usual concept of time is the twin paradox. Let us emphasize that this striking example of time dilation proves that time travel (towards the future) is possible. As a gedanken experiment (if we neglect practicalities such as the technology needed for reaching velocities comparable to the velocity of light, the cost of the fuel and the capacity of the traveller to sustain high accelerations), it shows that a sentient being can jump, "within a minute" (of his experienced time) arbitrarily far in the future, say sixty million years ahead, and see, and be part of, what (will) happen then on Earth. This is a clear way of realizing that the future "already exists" (as we can experience it "in a minute")." http://www.bourbaphy.fr/damourtemps.pdf https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De9fBJwWkAEMaXZ.jpg "These are the props. You own a barn, 40m long, with automatic doors at either end, that can be opened and closed simultaneously by a switch. You also have a pole, 80m long, which of course won't fit in the barn. [...] So, as the pole passes through the barn, there is an instant when it is completely within the barn. At that instant, you close both doors simultaneously, with your switch. [...] If it does not explode under the strain and it is sufficiently elastic it will come to rest and start to spring back to its natural shape but since it is too big for the barn the other end is now going to crash into the back door and the rod will be TRAPPED IN A COMPRESSED STATE inside the barn." http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...barn_pole.html Pentcho Valev 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Einstein's General Relativity: Obvious Nonsense  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  2  April 9th 19 11:16 AM 
The Most Obvious Refutation of Einstein's Relativity  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  1  September 22nd 17 12:12 PM 
Einstein's Most Obvious Nonsense  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  2  September 20th 17 08:18 AM 
The Obvious Falsehood of Einstein's Relativity  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  1  March 7th 16 11:48 AM 
THE OBVIOUS ABSURDITY OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  6  December 3rd 13 11:05 PM 