A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » SETI
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New planet vs. Drake's Equation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 3rd 07, 01:00 AM posted to sci.astro,sci.skeptic,sci.astro.seti
Joseph Lazio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 200
Default New planet vs. Drake's Equation

"M" == Modemac writes:

M Maybe it's the optimist in me, but the discovery of a new,
M "potentially" Earth-like planet makes me hopeful for the future of
M Drake's Equation.

M Given the state of current technology, it seems that we may not be
M able to conduct any kind of detailed study of the new planet in
M Gliese for, oh, maybe thirty to fifty years. But when that time
M comes, all eyes will be focused on it. For *if* they find some
M kind of evidence of life, it could radically alter the equation.

No, it won't. It may alter the values we assign to the various
factors of the equation, by giving us a better estimate of them, but
it will not alter the equation.

--
Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail:
No means no, stop rape. |
http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/
sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html
  #2  
Old May 3rd 07, 12:39 PM posted to sci.astro.seti
Patrick Meuser-Bianca
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 42
Default New planet vs. Drake's Equation

Hogwash, ery1 knows that there are two poles in transition between any two
planets, so the relative difference as a singular body can be contradicted
in certain light of an emerging society's take on geokinetic and
astralkinetic fields of a local mecha-genesis that we'll be wrting of until
the end of the century. Noone knows that the triadic form of this equation
holds to such divisions in virtually every aspect of life, that such
realizations are granted as a mathematically sound fate, I'm not so sure....
This holds the capability to architect inter-plnaetary networks by teh
story-space of such since there had better been a crisis-risk like
Alpha-Beta-Theta for its interim study.

Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticist, Crisis-risk Consultant
"Joseph Lazio" wrote in message
...
"M" == Modemac writes:


M Maybe it's the optimist in me, but the discovery of a new,
M "potentially" Earth-like planet makes me hopeful for the future of
M Drake's Equation.

M Given the state of current technology, it seems that we may not be
M able to conduct any kind of detailed study of the new planet in
M Gliese for, oh, maybe thirty to fifty years. But when that time
M comes, all eyes will be focused on it. For *if* they find some
M kind of evidence of life, it could radically alter the equation.

No, it won't. It may alter the values we assign to the various
factors of the equation, by giving us a better estimate of them, but
it will not alter the equation.

--
Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail:
No means no, stop rape. |
http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/
sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New planet vs. Drake's Equation Modemac Astronomy Misc 1 May 3rd 07 01:00 AM
(M1*m1),(p1*p2),(q1*q2) equation.!! brian a m stuckless SETI 4 December 15th 05 08:46 PM
Equation of time: need the equation itself [email protected] Misc 1 March 10th 05 05:02 AM
Old Equation May Shed New Light On Planet Formation Ron Astronomy Misc 0 January 5th 04 10:03 PM
Drake's Equation Rich SETI 1 October 8th 03 07:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.