|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New planet vs. Drake's Equation
"M" == Modemac writes:
M Maybe it's the optimist in me, but the discovery of a new, M "potentially" Earth-like planet makes me hopeful for the future of M Drake's Equation. M Given the state of current technology, it seems that we may not be M able to conduct any kind of detailed study of the new planet in M Gliese for, oh, maybe thirty to fifty years. But when that time M comes, all eyes will be focused on it. For *if* they find some M kind of evidence of life, it could radically alter the equation. No, it won't. It may alter the values we assign to the various factors of the equation, by giving us a better estimate of them, but it will not alter the equation. -- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
New planet vs. Drake's Equation
Hogwash, ery1 knows that there are two poles in transition between any two
planets, so the relative difference as a singular body can be contradicted in certain light of an emerging society's take on geokinetic and astralkinetic fields of a local mecha-genesis that we'll be wrting of until the end of the century. Noone knows that the triadic form of this equation holds to such divisions in virtually every aspect of life, that such realizations are granted as a mathematically sound fate, I'm not so sure.... This holds the capability to architect inter-plnaetary networks by teh story-space of such since there had better been a crisis-risk like Alpha-Beta-Theta for its interim study. Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" Cyberneticist, Crisis-risk Consultant "Joseph Lazio" wrote in message ... "M" == Modemac writes: M Maybe it's the optimist in me, but the discovery of a new, M "potentially" Earth-like planet makes me hopeful for the future of M Drake's Equation. M Given the state of current technology, it seems that we may not be M able to conduct any kind of detailed study of the new planet in M Gliese for, oh, maybe thirty to fifty years. But when that time M comes, all eyes will be focused on it. For *if* they find some M kind of evidence of life, it could radically alter the equation. No, it won't. It may alter the values we assign to the various factors of the equation, by giving us a better estimate of them, but it will not alter the equation. -- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New planet vs. Drake's Equation | Modemac | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 3rd 07 01:00 AM |
(M1*m1),(p1*p2),(q1*q2) equation.!! | brian a m stuckless | SETI | 4 | December 15th 05 08:46 PM |
Equation of time: need the equation itself | [email protected] | Misc | 1 | March 10th 05 05:02 AM |
Old Equation May Shed New Light On Planet Formation | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 5th 04 10:03 PM |
Drake's Equation | Rich | SETI | 1 | October 8th 03 07:18 PM |