|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox
Earth is a unique planet because it has continents.
(see: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/life-01x1.html) The Earth's crust is made of two layers called sima and sial. Sima is the lower and denser layer. It is 5 to 10 km thick and covers the entire surface of the Earth. Sial is 20-70 km thick and covers only 30% of the Earth's surface; this is the elevated part of the Earth's surface called continents. The remaining 70% of the Earth's surface is covered with oceans. None of the existing theories explain how the sial was selectively scooped up from 70% of the Earth's surface and deposited on the Moon. A glancing collision with the Moon could not have removed sial from more than about 10% of the Earth's surface and its energy would have melted the adjacent sial, which would have covered the entire surface of the removed sial. The selective removal of sial from large part of the Earth's surface is the only way to make continents. Continents must be made of sial because other minerals are too dense so they would sink rather than remain on the Earth's surface for eons. The missing sial leaves empty space between tectonic plates and thus makes plate tectonics possible on the Earth. Venus is good example of an Earth-like planet that does not have plate tectonics. Without plate tectonics to dissipate heat from its mantle, Venus undergoes a cyclical process in which mantle temperatures rise until they reach a critical level that weakens the crust. Then, over a period of about 100 million years, subduction occurs on enormous scale, completely recycling the crust. The subduction would have killed all higher forms of life if they had been present on Venus. In the absence of continents there would have been no advanced forms of life on Earth because the entire surface of the Earth would have been covered with oceans and the only source of minerals for the marine life would have been hydrothermal vents. The vents cannot support great abundance and diversity of life, which is necessary for speedy evolution of life. Marine life of our planet is confined to places that have abundance of iron, nitrates, phosphates and silicates. Nearly all of these minerals are transported from continents by rivers and winds. If the planet has no continents, it has no land animals that can make fire, smelt metals, and create technological civilization. If the planet has no continents, but it has an ocean, a giant asteroid impact may create islands, but these islands do not have lower density than the adjacent crust, so they sink in the crust. It is very difficult to imagine any geological or astronomical event that could selectively scoop up sial from 70% of the Earth's surface. I believe that the most probable event was a sequence of three collisions: 1. HYPOTHESIS: About 4.5 billion years ago the Kuiper belt object that is now 2003EL61 collided obliquely with another, unnamed, large Kuiper belt object. The oblique impact caused 2003EL61 to spin rapidly and it transformed its shape from a ball to american football. The probability that the impact was oblique is low, on the order of 0.01, because the 2003EL61 is the only large object in the solar system that spins rapidly and has american football shape. 2. FACT: The absence of planet in the place where Ceres asteroid is now is the only exception of the Titius-Bode Law. HYPOTHESIS: 4.5 billion years ago there was a bigger asteroid in the place where Ceres is now. Let us call it Theia and let us call the unnamed large Kuiper belt object Orpheus. Ceres has rocky core overlain with icy mantle. Theia had the same composition as Ceres but it was larger. Orpheus was made mostly of water ice. It was not broken into small pieces by the impact with 2003EL61 because the impact was oblique. The impact hurled Orpheus into a collision path with Theia. When Orpheus hit Theia, the impact moved Theia toward Jupiter and melted most of the water ice. The average distance between 2003EL61 and Ceres is on the order of 5000 Gm (35 AU). Diameter of Orpheus was probably on the order of 1000 km. Diameter of Theia is unknown; let us assume that it was 2000 km. The probability that Orpheus hit Theia is on the order of 10^-13. 3. HYPOTHESIS: The enormous gravity of Jupiter hurled Theia toward the Earth. As Theia was moving toward the Earth, its mantle of liquid water was vaporized by the sunlight, creating watery atmosphere. Theia became giant comet. Its rocky core collided with the Moon thus creating a new, hot Moon. A few hours later Theia's watery atmosphere collided with the Earth. It ablated Earth's sial on all sides except the back 30% of the Earth's surface. Dust particles made from the sial, the Moon, and the rocky core of Theia were suspended in the atmosphere. Some of Theia's atmosphere was captured by the new Moon. The dust settling on the hot Moon melted and formed the Moon's crust. When the collision separated Theia's rocky core from its atmosphere, the atmosphere quickly expanded due to the heat generated by the collision and due to reduced gravity (no core). The expansion reduced density of the atmosphere before the collision with the Earth. Theia was quickly loosing its volatile atmosphere after the collision with Orpheus because much of its elliptic orbit was close to the sun. If it was loosing its atmosphere at the rate of 0.1 meter per day, it had to collide with the Earth in about 10,000 years. The probability that the collision between Earth and Theia took place within 10,000 years since the collision between Theia and Orpheus is on the order of 10^-9. The probability that all these events occurred is on the order of (0.01)*(10^-13)*(10^-9) = 10^-24. One percent of stars in our galaxy, called Milky Way, has Earth-like planets which have liquid water and thus seem capable of supporting life. This means that the probability that the Earth has oceans and continents is on the order of 10^-26. There are about 100 billion (10^11) stars in our galaxy and about 7*10^22 stars in the entire visible universe. The probability that another planet in the entire visible universe has oceans and continents is on the order of (10^-26)*(7*10^22) = 7*10^-4; about one event in one thousand. We are lucky to have massive Moon. Earth's obliquity (the angle between the Earth's equator and the plane of its orbit) is 23.5 degrees. If the massive Moon had not existed, the Earth's obliquity would have varied wildly between 0 and 80 degrees. Such variation would have caused extreme climatic changes. The probability that a planet has continents and that its advanced forms of life survive as long as they have survived on our planet is low because we barely survived a few cataclysms and because there may have been close calls that left no evidence that we can study. My estimates are not precise but they do not have to be precise to convey important truth: we are the only civilization in the visible universe, so SETI is a waste of time. There is another proof that planets having continents are extremely ra if they had been common, extraterrestrial civilizations would have colonized our galaxy and our planet billions of years ago. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox
Andrew Nowicki wrote:
Earth is a unique planet because it has continents. (see: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/life-01x1.html) First made an interesting read by Isaac Asimov in a prequel to the Foundation series. I forget the name. -- There is no excuse for us to accept from politicians anything that we would never accept from our own children. Maybe that is why they work at appearing lovable. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3723 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml Lawful to bomb Israelis http://www.giwersworld.org/israel/bombings.phtml a11 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox
On 27 Mar, 03:55, Andrew Nowicki wrote:
Earth is a unique planet because it has continents. (see:http://www.spacedaily.com/news/life-01x1.html) The Earth's crust is made of two layers called sima and sial. Sima is the lower and denser layer. It is 5 to 10 km thick and covers the entire surface of the Earth. Sial is 20-70 km thick and covers only 30% of the Earth's surface; this is the elevated part of the Earth's surface called continents. The remaining 70% of the Earth's surface is covered with oceans. None of the existing theories explain how the sial was selectively scooped up from 70% of the Earth's surface and deposited on the Moon. A glancing collision with the Moon could not have removed sial from more than about 10% of the Earth's surface and its energy would have melted the adjacent sial, which would have covered the entire surface of the removed sial. The selective removal of sial from large part of the Earth's surface is the only way to make continents. Continents must be made of sial because other minerals are too dense so they would sink rather than remain on the Earth's surface for eons. The missing sial leaves empty space between tectonic plates and thus makes plate tectonics possible on the Earth. Venus is good example of an Earth-like planet that does not have plate tectonics. Without plate tectonics to dissipate heat from its mantle, Venus undergoes a cyclical process in which mantle temperatures rise until they reach a critical level that weakens the crust. Then, over a period of about 100 million years, subduction occurs on enormous scale, completely recycling the crust. The subduction would have killed all higher forms of life if they had been present on Venus. In the absence of continents there would have been no advanced forms of life on Earth because the entire surface of the Earth would have been covered with oceans and the only source of minerals for the marine life would have been hydrothermal vents. The vents cannot support great abundance and diversity of life, which is necessary for speedy evolution of life. Marine life of our planet is confined to places that have abundance of iron, nitrates, phosphates and silicates. Nearly all of these minerals are transported from continents by rivers and winds. If the planet has no continents, it has no land animals that can make fire, smelt metals, and create technological civilization. If the planet has no continents, but it has an ocean, a giant asteroid impact may create islands, but these islands do not have lower density than the adjacent crust, so they sink in the crust. It is very difficult to imagine any geological or astronomical event that could selectively scoop up sial from 70% of the Earth's surface. I believe that the most probable event was a sequence of three collisions: 1. HYPOTHESIS: About 4.5 billion years ago the Kuiper belt object that is now 2003EL61 collided obliquely with another, unnamed, large Kuiper belt object. The oblique impact caused 2003EL61 to spin rapidly and it transformed its shape from a ball to american football. The probability that the impact was oblique is low, on the order of 0.01, because the 2003EL61 is the only large object in the solar system that spins rapidly and has american football shape. 2. FACT: The absence of planet in the place where Ceres asteroid is now is the only exception of the Titius-Bode Law. HYPOTHESIS: 4.5 billion years ago there was a bigger asteroid in the place where Ceres is now. Let us call it Theia and let us call the unnamed large Kuiper belt object Orpheus. Ceres has rocky core overlain with icy mantle. Theia had the same composition as Ceres but it was larger. Orpheus was made mostly of water ice. It was not broken into small pieces by the impact with 2003EL61 because the impact was oblique. The impact hurled Orpheus into a collision path with Theia. When Orpheus hit Theia, the impact moved Theia toward Jupiter and melted most of the water ice. The average distance between 2003EL61 and Ceres is on the order of 5000 Gm (35 AU). Diameter of Orpheus was probably on the order of 1000 km. Diameter of Theia is unknown; let us assume that it was 2000 km. The probability that Orpheus hit Theia is on the order of 10^-13. 3. HYPOTHESIS: The enormous gravity of Jupiter hurled Theia toward the Earth. As Theia was moving toward the Earth, its mantle of liquid water was vaporized by the sunlight, creating watery atmosphere. Theia became giant comet. Its rocky core collided with the Moon thus creating a new, hot Moon. A few hours later Theia's watery atmosphere collided with the Earth. It ablated Earth's sial on all sides except the back 30% of the Earth's surface. Dust particles made from the sial, the Moon, and the rocky core of Theia were suspended in the atmosphere. Some of Theia's atmosphere was captured by the new Moon. The dust settling on the hot Moon melted and formed the Moon's crust. When the collision separated Theia's rocky core from its atmosphere, the atmosphere quickly expanded due to the heat generated by the collision and due to reduced gravity (no core). The expansion reduced density of the atmosphere before the collision with the Earth. Theia was quickly loosing its volatile atmosphere after the collision with Orpheus because much of its elliptic orbit was close to the sun. If it was loosing its atmosphere at the rate of 0.1 meter per day, it had to collide with the Earth in about 10,000 years. The probability that the collision between Earth and Theia took place within 10,000 years since the collision between Theia and Orpheus is on the order of 10^-9. The probability that all these events occurred is on the order of (0.01)*(10^-13)*(10^-9) = 10^-24. One percent of stars in our galaxy, called Milky Way, has Earth-like planets which have liquid water and thus seem capable of supporting life. This means that the probability that the Earth has oceans and continents is on the order of 10^-26. There are about 100 billion (10^11) stars in our galaxy and about 7*10^22 stars in the entire visible universe. The probability that another planet in the entire visible universe has oceans and continents is on the order of (10^-26)*(7*10^22) = 7*10^-4; about one event in one thousand. We are lucky to have massive Moon. Earth's obliquity (the angle between the Earth's equator and the plane of its orbit) is 23.5 degrees. If the massive Moon had not existed, the Earth's obliquity would have varied wildly between 0 and 80 degrees. Such variation would have caused extreme climatic changes. The probability that a planet has continents and that its advanced forms of life survive as long as they have survived on our planet is low because we barely survived a few cataclysms and because there may have been close calls that left no evidence that we can study. My estimates are not precise but they do not have to be precise to convey important truth: we are the only civilization in the visible universe, so SETI is a waste of time. There is another proof that planets having continents are extremely ra if they had been common, extraterrestrial civilizations would have colonized our galaxy and our planet billions of years ago. How come Mars has even more elevation than Earth. Add 10 million cubic kilometres of water to Mars (a 300km diameter ice ball, with some ammonia mixed in) and it might have a descent climate. Of course, there are other explanations as to why there are no extra terrestrials, or why they've never visited. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox
How come Mars has even more elevation than Earth. Add 10 million cubic kilometres of water to Mars (a 300km diameter ice ball, with some ammonia mixed in) and it might have a descent climate. Of course, there are other explanations as to why there are no extra terrestrials, or why they've never visited. Ah, question answered in the next link: Quote However, things aren't as simple - they never are! Mars has no plate tectonics, and does not even have the episodic mountain building processes that Venus does. Those attractively large looking land areas will be swallowed fast. Most of the mountains in the southern hemisphere of Mars are over 3.5 billion years old. They would all be gone by now. Even the dramatic-looking Tharsis volcanic province is deceptive. The flow rate from Mons Olympus is no more than from Hawaii on Earth. Erosion can keep close match to that leading to a broad shallow sea of eroded lava sand, with a small volcanic island in the middle. And when we look at Mars' heat flow and the activity of its volcanoes, we find that the planet is cooling off and contracting (Hoffman 2001d). For the last billion years, very little has happened on Mars to build mountains. If there were an ocean on Mars, it would have eaten away all the land by now and filled in the basins to make a giant flat ball covered in water - another waterworld. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox
Andrew Nowicki wrote:
Earth is a unique planet because it has continents. (see: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/life-01x1.html) The Earth's crust is made of two layers called sima and sial. Sima is the lower and denser layer. It is 5 to 10 km thick and covers the entire surface of the Earth. Sial is 20-70 km thick and covers only 30% of the Earth's surface; this is the elevated part of the Earth's surface called continents. The remaining 70% of the Earth's surface is covered with oceans. None of the existing theories explain how the sial was selectively scooped up from 70% of the Earth's surface and deposited on the Moon. A glancing collision with the Moon could not have removed sial from more than about 10% of the Earth's surface and its energy would have melted the adjacent sial, which would have covered the entire surface of the removed sial. The problem with this hypothesis is not apparent in this summary. It appears to say that because something is missing there is plate tectonics. Yet a view of the plates shows nothing missing. Plates cover the world. Thus there is no connection between something missing and plates all over the world. It appears rather than asymmetrical motions of the core are the source of the layer that became the plates. The most obvious source of the asymmetry is simply the radioactive heating of the core which causes the warmest to rise towards the surface. It cannot rise uniformly without leaving a vacuum in the center. As the center of the earth has no effect of gravity the effect increases as it moves further from the center giving radial acceleration. And then the earth rotates giving a force away from the axis to combine with a force away from the center. In any event there are more than sufficient forces to break up the layer/type of material that became our plates. So the problem on Mars is size so the heating forces are much less. That said something like half of Mars would be dry land which are unrelated to volcanic activity. The only issue with Venus is the amount of atmosphere. It is not clear how Earth's relative lack of atmosphere can be explained by an impact given the explanation I have read of the moon forming after the impact. A proportion of the atmosphere should have gone to the moon in the ratio of the mass. In space all matter is equal when ejected by the impact whether it started as solid, liquid or gas. (In fact gas should be less ejected velocity as it is weakly coupled to the impact force.) If there is an unusual amount of atmosphere missing then there must also be an unusual amount of land/crust/whatever missing. That may be true but I have not heard mention of it. -- If the US recognizes the right of Jews to Palestine how can it deny Utah to the Latter Day Saints? -- The Iron Webmaster, 3739 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml Old Testament http://www.giwersworld.org/bible/ot.phtml a6 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox
Andrew Nowicki wrote:
Earth is a unique planet because it has continents. (see: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/life-01x1.html) (snip) Some interpret a mountain range on Titan as evidence of plate tectonics. If there are two bodies in our solar system with this phenomenon, I'd guess it isn't very rare throughout the galaxy. Hop |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox
Hop David wrote:
Andrew Nowicki wrote: Earth is a unique planet because it has continents. (see: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/life-01x1.html) (snip) Some interpret a mountain range on Titan as evidence of plate tectonics. If there are two bodies in our solar system with this phenomenon, I'd guess it isn't very rare throughout the galaxy. Hop Some say the science isn't settled on this so-called Titan. Some say these pictures look like photoshopped images of Earth's frozen polar regions. Some say NASA is angling for climate change research pork dollars, and this inconvenient evidence of a cold terrestrial environment is being passed off to the public as images "from another world." Are NASA researchers in the thrall of Al Gore and the enviro-fascists? Does Titan actually exist? And why does it have the same name as a big, gas-guzzling pickup truck? These are open questions. -- It Came From Corry Lee Smith's Unclaimed Mysteries. http://www.unclaimedmysteries.net Keep your head and arms inside The Mixer at all times. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox
In article .net,
Unclaimed Mysteries the_letter_k_and_the_numeral_4_doh@unclaimedmyste ries.net wrote: Some say the science isn't settled on this so-called Titan. Some say these pictures look like photoshopped images of Earth's frozen polar regions. Some say NASA is angling for climate change research pork dollars, and this inconvenient evidence of a cold terrestrial environment is being passed off to the public as images "from another world." Some are idiots. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox
Unclaimed Mysteries wrote: Some say the science isn't settled on this so-called Titan. Some say these pictures look like photoshopped images of Earth's frozen polar regions. Some say there's a witch flying around in Mexico: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNbe0YWXUuc At the Justice League Of Mexico, we of course _know_ that there is a witch flying around in Mexico; Sister Betrayal, The Fallen Nun. But what most of the good people of Mexico don't suspect is that there are _thousands of witches_ flying around in Mexico at any given moment...the air can be as thick with them as bats - but most of them aren't mucho-show-offs like Sister Betrayal, and employ stealth hexes. Si. That is the truth. A truth too frightening for many people to know. A truth too frightening for many of them to _ever_ know. As frightening as seeing a Chupacabra skull for the first time: http://tinyurl.com/25rdab Every morning, as I first look in the mirror to reassure myself that I am not yet undead, I thank Our Lady Of Tijuana that I do not have fangs growing out of _my_ nose. Watch for the sure signs of Chupacabra infestation at all times in your barrio: 1. A suspicious lack of goats in the vicinity. 2. Unopened bottles of salsa that have been drained through two small punctures in their necks. 3. Strange black dogs that chase cars at night...and catch them, draining the air out of their tires. ¿How will you know these creatures? This is "Chuci - The Good Chupacabra": http://farm1.static.flickr.com/8/118...02b975.jpg?v=0 Once a minion of El Diablo, he has seen the light, and now fights for Truth, Justice, and Lax Immigration Laws at the J.L.O.M. "Unnatural Creatures Petting Zoo". For him at least, there shall be peace in a joyous afterlife. But many of his kind still walk the world in the state of Damnation*: http://tinyurl.com/2vqoe3 http://tinyurl.com/36auzy Beware these Pups Of Perdition! Fr. Rev. Dr. Ernesto Cojones J.L.O.M. * They are particularly numerous and fierce in that state, and the wise hombre does not cross the border from Tamaulipas into it without good reason; and then only when carrying one of my patented Blessed Habanero Spray Crucifixes. The mighty blast of fearsome chilli spray emitted from our Crucified Saviour's Holy Mouth will send any fiend of El Diablo scurrying back to the infernal regions just to cool down. They are on sale this week BTW, and each contains a small fragment of an actual saint's bone; for five hundred pesos extra, this will be from a human saint, and not a St. Bernard. For one thousand pesos extra, it will be from a saint you might have actually heard of. ¿But may I suggest for anyone traveling in Chupacabra infested areas, that only the strongest protection will do? For only five thousand pesos extra, you can carry the most potent Chupacabra protection that we offer - The Blessed Habanero Spray Crucifix...containing a bone fragment of Santo Domingo De Silos, patron saint of mad dogs!: http://www.catholic-forum.com/SAINTS/saintd54.htm Si! I have once again returned from Europe with a rich harvest of Holy Artifacts extracted from its finest monasteries by the dark of the Moon, to preserve their Full Blessed Powers! And Spain, as usual, was first stop on my itinerary due to its lax security systems at Holy Sites! My risks are once again your gain! ;-) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox
I spent an hour and a half crafting a response. I pressed [send] and
it said it posted and it never appeared! lol. It was a good one too. Ah well. Without all the references I can summarize my points. 1) The incidence of organic matter in the universe is high 2) We are organic matter The question is, what is the incidence of creatures like us? The answer is pretty rare. Here's why 1) Our lifetime is short 2) We are the result of an unusual series of events Check it out.. Within the next 30 years we will either wipe ourselves out due to nuclear war, or wipe ourselves out due to environmental degradation or be wiped out by the technological singularity... here I'll give (again) one of the many references I used to build this result in my last post http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity ETI is most likely to be post biological. ETL - Extra Terrestrial Life is most likely to be singled celled. The Earth and Sun are 4.6 billion years old. To put the history of life into an understandable context lets say the Earth and Sun are the age of a 46 year old person. That's 100 million years per year on our scale model. So, the Earth and Sun were born together 46 years ago from the debris of exploded stars that were around from the beginning. Stars that were about 70 years old before they exploded. These older stars couldn't support life because they were made from the stuff of the big bang, and the stuff of the big bang didn't include nitrogen, oxygen, carbon, .. and so life as we know it was impossible. After the heavy stuff was made, life was common. So life is like life anywhere. Walk through the Kalihari desert during the dry season and you'll see baked mud. Walk there at just the right time after the rains come, and you'll see it teeming with life. That's the way the universe is today. All the stars are coming of age in our time - which makes sense because our time is the time of life. But look at the history and you'll see what Intelligent Life is so rare. The system was 6 before single celled life appeared. The system was 16 before photosynthesis was invented. The system was 26 before complex cells like we all are today were created. Complex cells are needed for multi-celled organisms (bodies and organs) to work. And the system was 36 before simple multi-celled organisms arose, and 40 before complex organism arose - organisms capable of brains. And technology arose just this morning, six years later - and radio telescopes rockets and nuclear power and antimatter only 8 seconds ago and the technological singularity that will displace organic intelligence will be 4 seconds from now. So, once brains appear technology seems as certain as life when the conditions for life appeared. That is it took six years on our scale model for life to appear after the Earth was formed, and it took 6 years on our scale model for technology and the technological singularity to appear after brains appeared. But it took 34 years for brains to appear! This suggests its far more diffcult to make brains from life than to make life itself. So, what does this tell us? That life is common. Intelligent life is rare. Well rare for life. Life is so common in the cosmos in this epoch its hard to say any part of it is rare. Intelligence is rare on the scale of galaxies and common in the universe still. But there's a twist. Intelligent life is a rare transitional stage between no intelligence and post-biological intelligence. Heck, bodies are a rate transitional stage between single celled organisms and big brains. We're like the placenta that occurs only during the birth of a new intelligence. Something that is essential to the formation of post- biological intelligence, but garbage after its born. So, this explains why ETIs don't contact us. We have nothing more to say to them than a placenta has to say to an adult human. And the adult human poking around with the placenta before the baby is born is not good. Although humans might be the subject of the attention of a few professoinals after the birth of the new post-biological intelligence once the birth takes place - but most likely to determine the health of the baby by learning how it was made at a very deep level. I'll post this and add a few other thoughts as well |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Missing Earth's sial explains Fermi paradox | Andrew Nowicki | Policy | 43 | April 9th 07 09:48 PM |
Why is 70% of Earth's sial missing? | Andrew Nowicki | Astronomy Misc | 15 | April 7th 07 08:10 PM |
Fermi Paradox | Andrew Nowicki | SETI | 36 | July 19th 05 01:49 AM |
Fermi Paradox | Andrew Nowicki | SETI | 3 | June 7th 05 01:42 AM |
Fermi Paradox | Andrew Nowicki | SETI | 10 | April 3rd 04 07:13 AM |