Silly Goose calls Einstein's inequalities **** and Dr. drosen can't read urls! Too funny!

"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
...
On Mar 10, 9:12 pm, "Androcles"
wrote:
"Darwin123" wrote in message

...
| r_AB/(c+v)=r_AB/(c-v)
| This equation still has not be referenced by Einstein.

Can't read, drosen?
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img11.gif

You get a computer, you get a mouse and you click on the coloured text
like
anyone else, you stupid ****ing moron.
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img11.gif
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img11.gif
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img11.gif
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img11.gif
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img11.gif

John, if nothing else at least you are consistent. You spray ****
everywhere, no matter what. Like a goddamn chocolate fountain.

On Mar 11, 5:03*am, "Androcles"
wrote:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message

...
On Mar 10, 9:12 pm, "Androcles"



wrote:
"Darwin123" wrote in message

...
| r_AB/(c+v)=r_AB/(c-v)
| This equation still has not be referenced by Einstein.

Can't read, drosen?
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img11.gif
Here is further proof that Androcles can't read.
The equation that he posted, that he claimed was written by
Einstein.
The Androcles equation:
r_AB/(c=V)=r_AB/(c-v)
If r_AB is not equal to zero, then the solution to this equation
is v=0. Regardless, this was the equation that that he wrote. He has
now written it twice.
He has set up a link to a graphic showing the equation that
Einstein wrote. It turns out that the equation that Einstein wrote is
actually a pair of equations.
The Einstein pair of equations.
t_B-t_A=r_AB/(c-v)
t'_A-t_B=r_AB/(c+v)

In his delusional mind, the Einstein pair of equations is
equivalent to the Androcles equation. The two are not the same. Anyone
who can read can tell that the pair of equation attributed to Einstein
is not equivalent to the equation written by Androcles.

The two are not the same. It is difficult to ascertain how he
made that mistake. However, I suspect there were at least two errors
that he made in a row to come to the conclusion.
1) He can not read punctuation.
a) I conjecture that he assumed that t'_A=t_A
b) The quantity, t'_A, is NOT equal to the quantity, t_A. The
quantity t' designates a different coordinate system.
2) He doesn't understand the sign of a quantity.
a) I conjecture that he assumed that t_A-t_B=t_B-t_A.
b) The quantity t_B-t_A is not equal to the quantity t_A-t_B.
c) The quantity t_B-t_A=-(t_A-t_B)
3) After making those two errors, he set one equation in the Einstein
set equal to the other.
a) I have no conjecture as to why he thought this equation
relevant.


I invite everyone to look at the equation that Androcles posted,
and compare it to the equations in the link set up by Androcles. You
will see that the two sets of equations are not the same.
I invite Androcles to compare the equations in his graphic to the
equation that he posted. If he reviews his classes in algebra, he will
see that the equations are not the same.
It isn't that Androcles doesn't understand relativity. Androcles
doesn't know English. I suggest a remedial course in punctuation.
Then, he can proceed to other subjects.
BTW: The solution to the Androcles equation is v=0, provided that
r_AB is not zero. This has nothing to do with relativity or Einstein.
However, maybe he could explain what this solution has to do with
relativity.

On Mar 11, 5:03 am, "Androcles"

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
wrote:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message

...
On Mar 10, 9:12 pm, "Androcles"

wrote:
"Darwin123" wrote in message

...
| r_AB/(c+v)=r_AB/(c-v)
| This equation still has not be referenced by Einstein.

Can't read, drosen?
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img11.gif

Here is further proof that Androcles can't read.
The equation that he posted, that he claimed was written by
Einstein.
The Androcles equation:
r_AB/(c+v)=r_AB/(c-v)
If r_AB is not equal to zero, then the solution to this equation
is v=0. Regardless, this was the equation that that he wrote. He has
now written it twice.
He has set up a link to a graphic showing the equation that
Einstein wrote. It turns out that the equation that Einstein wrote is
actually a pair of equations.
The Einstein pair of equations.
t_B-t_A=r_AB/(c-v)
t'_A-t_B=r_AB/(c+v)


Androcles, look at them! They aren't the same. Just look and
compare!
In his delusional mind, the Einstein pair of equations is
equivalent to the Androcles equation. The two are not the same. Anyone
who can read can tell that the pair of equation attributed to Einstein
is not equivalent to the equation written by Androcles.

The two are not the same. It is difficult to ascertain how he
made that mistake. However, I suspect there were at least two errors
that he made in a row to come to the conclusion.
1) He can not read punctuation.
a) I conjecture that he assumed that t'_A=t_A
b) The quantity, t'_A, is NOT equal to the quantity, t_A. The
quantity t' designates a different coordinate system.
2) He doesn't understand the sign of a quantity.
a) I conjecture that he assumed that t_A-t_B=t_B-t_A.
b) The quantity t_B-t_A is not equal to the quantity t_A-t_B.
c) The quantity t_B-t_A=-(t_A-t_B)
3) After making those two errors, he set one equation in the Einstein
set equal to the other.
a) I have no conjecture as to why he thought this equation
relevant.

I invite everyone to look at the equation that Androcles posted,
and compare it to the equations in the link set up by Androcles. You
will see that the two sets of equations are not the same.
I invite Androcles to compare the equations in his graphic to the
equation that he posted. If he reviews his classes in algebra, he will
see that the equations are not the same.
It isn't that Androcles doesn't understand relativity. Androcles
doesn't know English. I suggest a remedial course in punctuation.
Then, he can proceed to other subjects.
BTW: The solution to the Androcles equation is v=0, provided that
r_AB is not zero. This has nothing to do with relativity or Einstein.
However, maybe he could explain what this solution has to do with
relativity.