|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Base baby steps
In sci.space.policy Henry Spencer wrote:
In article , Sander Vesik wrote: No, *some* of them are *possibly* rubble piles. Some are definitely not; Eros, in particular, appears to be essentially solid rock. Even for the low-density ones, the matter is not entirely settled... Surely also at least the double asteroids (two asteroids orbiting each other closely) are also not rubble piles? They might be. A close encounter with a planet can split a rubble pile into a pair of rubble piles, by tidal interaction. (In fact, one of the points offered in support of the rubble-pile hypothesis is precisely that we see a suspiciously large number of double asteroids, which ought to be fairly rare unless there is some specific mechanism that creates them.) But if you have two piles of rubble orbiting each other, then surely tidal forces would over time convert these to fuzzy rubble-balls that would then coalesce into a single body? -- Sander +++ Out of cheese error +++ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
building a base on the Moon | Andromeda et Julie | Science | 7 | February 15th 04 03:34 AM |
NEWS: The allure of an outpost on the Moon | Kent Betts | Space Shuttle | 2 | January 15th 04 12:56 AM |
We choose to go to the Moon? | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 49 | December 10th 03 10:14 AM |
Moon base or ISS? I say take your pick | Abdul Ahad | Space Station | 23 | November 16th 03 06:18 AM |