#121
|
|||
|
|||
Booster Crossing
Kent Betts wrote in message
om... "John Maxson" wrote in message ... The cornerstone of my arguments has always been that... it may well *not* be so that "flame later comes from the rocket," prior to the explosion. Nevertheless, one must certainly explain the black smoke at lift-off, relative to those flames (from wherever they came) at about t+59 seconds. It is not necessary to explain the black smoke relative to those flames since anyone with a good magnifier can see that the flames were inserted into the picture later...by means of computer generation. Not here http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v3n35b.htm , or here http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v3n42.htm (no perfect transition ellipses higher up on the stack); but here http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v3n41.htm , and here http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v3n43.htm . It's the flames before and after the transition ellipses (which were inserted between about t+59 and t+63 seconds) which need to be related to the black smoke at lift-off. Even you should be able to accept that. -- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Booster Crossing
"Kent Betts" wrote in message om... It is not necessary to explain the black smoke relative to those flames since anyone with a good magnifier can see that the flames were inserted into the picture later...by means of computer generation. *sigh* Plonk |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Booster Crossing
Terrence: FWIW, Kent was being sarcastic.
Jon "Terrence Daniels" "Kent Betts" wrote in message It is not necessary to explain the black smoke relative to those flames since anyone with a good magnifier can see that the flames were inserted into the picture later...by means of computer generation. *sigh* Plonk |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Booster Crossing
Terrence: FWIW, Kent was being sarcastic.
In that case, I'll un-plonk him. This post (and another one earlier) led me to believe that he was just JTM posting under another name... I guess I wasn't reading close enough. |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Booster Crossing
"Terrence Daniels" wrote:
Terrence: FWIW, Kent was being sarcastic. In that case, I'll un-plonk him. This post (and another one earlier) led me to believe that he was just JTM posting under another name... I guess I wasn't reading close enough. We all make mistakes here Terrence. Please don't make the mistake of prejudging any poster here. Give us all a chance over time. -- Daniel Mount Charleston, not Charleston, SC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Berndt's Butchery | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 9 | August 28th 03 01:10 PM |
FOIA Data Exposing 51-L Fireball Crossing | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 6 | August 26th 03 10:18 AM |
Why do we care about the crossing? | BenignVanilla | Space Shuttle | 9 | August 16th 03 09:52 AM |
Challenger Salvage Chief Conceded Fireball Crossing | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 31 | July 25th 03 05:54 AM |