A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Roll Anomaly



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 3rd 08, 04:40 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.station
kT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,032
Default Roll Anomaly

Slight roll anomaly, looked like orangish flames from the engine.

And then it was gone. Damn. Space is hard.
  #2  
Old August 3rd 08, 05:46 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.station
Jim Kingdon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 185
Default Roll Anomaly

And then it was gone. Damn. Space is hard.

Yeah,
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=1299
is repeating the same news but no details.
  #3  
Old August 3rd 08, 05:52 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.station
kT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,032
Default Roll Anomaly

Jim Kingdon wrote:

And then it was gone. Damn. Space is hard.


Yeah,
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=1299
is repeating the same news but no details.


I HATE staging. It is the root of all evil.

I don't use that word very often.

Well, SRBs get me going too.
  #4  
Old August 3rd 08, 10:37 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.station
Brian Gaff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,312
Default Roll Anomaly

Are you sure they did not buy the bolts holding the stages together from a
dodgy Russian vendor?

:-)

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________


"kT" wrote in message
...
Jim Kingdon wrote:

And then it was gone. Damn. Space is hard.


Yeah,
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=1299
is repeating the same news but no details.


I HATE staging. It is the root of all evil.

I don't use that word very often.

Well, SRBs get me going too.



  #5  
Old August 3rd 08, 10:44 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.station
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Roll Anomaly



Brian Gaff wrote:
Are you sure they did not buy the bolts holding the stages together from a
dodgy Russian vendor?

:-)


That thought occurred to you also, I see.
They had one or more Proton launches recently where the stages didn't
separate either.

Pat
  #7  
Old August 3rd 08, 01:33 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.station
Brian Gaff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,312
Default Roll Anomaly

As I say, you have the advantage, being able to see the video, but from the
description I immediately thought of an uneven release putting the motion
into the stack and then its too late.

Brian

--
Brian Gaff -
Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name may be lost.
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Martha Adams" wrote in message
news:70hlk.125$xv.52@trnddc02...
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
om...
Are you sure they did not buy the bolts holding the stages together from
a dodgy Russian vendor?

Brian
--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:



I was watching the video at liftoff, and I saw
the roll. I'm not sure what to make of that.
Most of the rocket mass is fuel -- some 95%, I
believe; and the body of the rocket can rotate
on its long axis without rotating the fuel.
I'm thinking about that because those axial
rolls started sharply, were fast, and stopped
sharply, which implied a lot of force applied
from somewhere. Might it be, the force of the
axial roll, damaged the 2nd stage release
system, which then failed? If I were designing
such a system, where weight is *everything,* I
doubt I'd make it strong vs axial roll forces.

I notice Musk says he's brought in a "large"
investor. I don't like to hear that, for now
Musk no longer entirely owns his company. Who
are the new people and what's their track
record? ??

Titeotwawki -- mha [sci.space.policy 2008 Aug 03]




  #8  
Old August 3rd 08, 06:05 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.station
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Roll Anomaly



Martha Adams wrote:

I notice Musk says he's brought in a "large"
investor. I don't like to hear that, for now
Musk no longer entirely owns his company. Who
are the new people and what's their track
record? ??


That's interesting...Rutan's Scaled Composites got bought out by
Northrop Grumman recently.
(They owned 40% of the stock before the buy out.)
Scaled Composites just issued a update on the SpaceShipTwo nitrous
oxide explosion BTW:
http://spacefellowship.com/News/?p=6230

Pat
  #10  
Old August 3rd 08, 11:22 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.station
Martha Adams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 371
Default Roll Anomaly

"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
m...
You don't think that the big guys will buy up the small ones to shut
them down then?

Brian

--
Brian Gaff -
Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name may be lost.
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
dakotatelephone...


Martha Adams wrote:

I notice Musk says he's brought in a "large"
investor. I don't like to hear that, for now
Musk no longer entirely owns his company. Who
are the new people and what's their track
record? ??


That's interesting...Rutan's Scaled Composites got bought out by
Northrop Grumman recently.
(They owned 40% of the stock before the buy out.)
Scaled Composites just issued a update on the SpaceShipTwo nitrous
oxide explosion BTW:
http://spacefellowship.com/News/?p=6230

Pat


I can't guess what to expect, but I think I may not
like it. I heard Musk about his work about two years
ago, at which time, he seemed to believe what he was
doing would completely upset the pricing applecart.

Which I expect, will thereby provoke strong resistance
from those whose money is there. $10K/lb to orbit:
that is a lot of money and *somebody gets it*. Now
comes Musk saying, $1K/lb to orbit and we'll be
bringing it down. How do you think the $10K/lb people
feel? So I suspect there is some very rough stuff
behind the scenes here and we aren't hearing about
it. If someone has enough money to buy Musk and put
him out of business, that's the "nice" way to do it,
but as these stories come along, I've my eye out for
deliberate, very indirect but effective, *sabotage.*

On this topic, whatever happened to that SSTO that
looked so good recently, whose preliminary tests were
so encouraging? I.e., what *really* happened? ??

For a look at some of this stuff, see "The Return,"
by Buzz Aldrin and John Barnes. Paperback, 2000.
Get that into your head and let it work arond a
little. If you have any industrial experience, that
will come in to it too.

Titeotwawki -- mha [sci.space.policy 2008 Aug 03]





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roll Anomaly kT Space Shuttle 22 August 9th 08 05:18 AM
BBQ Roll question... OM History 8 February 23rd 06 11:42 AM
"Let's roll ... Twittering One Misc 26 October 24th 05 08:55 AM
Roll Out the Old Blue Jet Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket Astronomy Misc 2 September 26th 05 04:47 PM
The Roll Problem [email protected] Policy 1 October 6th 04 09:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.