|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
MSNBC (Oberg) -- NASA addresses fears about space fire hazard
Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) wrote: You're missing the point that both of these are inert gases, O2 is not, then add the effects of adiabatic compression. Loud isn't the issue. It's going to come out of that nozzle so fast, and so cold, that you might freeze your ever-lovin' balls off if they are in the way. This is a case of a "blow job" and "blue balls" that no guy needs. ;-) Pat |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
MSNBC (Oberg) -- NASA addresses fears about space fire hazard
On May 30, 3:41 pm, (Derek Lyons) wrote:
"Jim Oberg" wrote: NASA's response illustrates how seriously the space agency is taking safety concerns in the wake of the 2003 Columbia tragedy - which led to the loss of the shuttle and its crew, and raised alarms about a "broken safety culture." When you have to brag about how safe you are - your safety culture is _still_ broken. George Bush does just the opposite WRT terrorist attacks. Does that mean we are actually safe from them? Not to mention "the valve will now be opened slowly to prevent a sharp pressure/velocity rise". Huh? That's a *basic* safety precaution for working with pressurized gases. If first learned it thirty years ago working in a bicycle shop! Where has NASA been? What better way to comment on a procedural oversight than by declaring victory for avoiding a safety hazard. Eric D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
MSNBC (Oberg) -- NASA addresses fears about space fire hazard
"Derek Lyons" wrote in message
... Pat Flannery wrote: Derek Lyons wrote: Not to mention "the valve will now be opened slowly to prevent a sharp pressure/velocity rise". Huh? That's a *basic* safety precaution for working with pressurized gases. If first learned it thirty years ago working in a bicycle shop! Where has NASA been? Did you ever crank open a 3000 psi helium tank without a regulator on it? Boy, now that's loud! :-) No, but we did once vent the 3200psi N2 system via the tube pressurization system and an empty missile tube. Think "really big pipe organ". This resulted in a stern warning from Squadron to use the Authorized Procedure, which was much quieter and much less fun. So, I've got to ask. How many octaves below middle C was it? (And now I'm reminded of an old sci-fi story where the character's father "plays" the vents on Mons Olympus on Mars.) Of course now if something had gone wrong and you'd broken the boat, some NASA engineer could talk about the irresponsible Navy safety culture. 1/2 :-) D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL -- Greg Moore SQL Server DBA Consulting Remote and Onsite available! Email: sql (at) greenms.com http://www.greenms.com/sqlserver.html |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
MSNBC (Oberg) -- NASA addresses fears about space fire hazard
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote:
"Derek Lyons" wrote in message ... Pat Flannery wrote: Derek Lyons wrote: Not to mention "the valve will now be opened slowly to prevent a sharp pressure/velocity rise". Huh? That's a *basic* safety precaution for working with pressurized gases. If first learned it thirty years ago working in a bicycle shop! Where has NASA been? Did you ever crank open a 3000 psi helium tank without a regulator on it? Boy, now that's loud! :-) No, but we did once vent the 3200psi N2 system via the tube pressurization system and an empty missile tube. Think "really big pipe organ". This resulted in a stern warning from Squadron to use the Authorized Procedure, which was much quieter and much less fun. So, I've got to ask. How many octaves below middle C was it? Dammifino. It's not like we measured! (And now I'm reminded of an old sci-fi story where the character's father "plays" the vents on Mons Olympus on Mars.) Of course now if something had gone wrong and you'd broken the boat, some NASA engineer could talk about the irresponsible Navy safety culture. 1/2 :-) LOL! D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
MSNBC (Oberg) -- NASA addresses fears about space fire hazard
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
MSNBC (Oberg) -- NASA addresses fears about space fire hazard
"Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!)" wrote:
: :Ever the wi still, eh?. And folks wonder why usenet id dead/dying. Never :saw anything associated with an extreme temperature rise mentioned. That :is the major problem with a large adiabatic compression in an O2 system. :The temperature rise leads to widening flammability limits of any :contaminant in the system as well as a reduction in the minimum required :energy for ignition or transition to spontaneous ignition. : Which "large adiabatic compression" would that be, Ed? I would expect pressure to be going the OTHER way when you're talking about an O2 line like that. The stuff starts out compressed and is going to LOWER pressures as it exits the line... -- "It's always different. It's always complex. But at some point, somebody has to draw the line. And that somebody is always me.... I am the law." -- Buffy, The Vampire Slayer |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
MSNBC (Oberg) -- NASA addresses fears about space fire hazard
"Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!)" wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 15:48:26 GMT, in sci.space.policy (Derek Lyons) wrote: "Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!)" wrote: On Thu, 31 May 2007 04:25:39 GMT, in sci.space.policy (Derek Lyons) wrote: Pat Flannery wrote: Derek Lyons wrote: Not to mention "the valve will now be opened slowly to prevent a sharp pressure/velocity rise". Huh? That's a *basic* safety precaution for working with pressurized gases. If first learned it thirty years ago working in a bicycle shop! Where has NASA been? Did you ever crank open a 3000 psi helium tank without a regulator on it? Boy, now that's loud! :-) No, but we did once vent the 3200psi N2 system via the tube pressurization system and an empty missile tube. Think "really big pipe organ". This resulted in a stern warning from Squadron to use the Authorized Procedure, which was much quieter and much less fun. You're missing the point that both of these are inert gases, O2 is not, then add the effects of adiabatic compression. Loud isn't the issue. Reading comprehension, get some. Then read my first paragraph (which you even quoted). Ever the wi still, eh?. Nope. Ever the person who points out to individuals their ignorance. Never saw anything associated with an extreme temperature rise mentioned. Reading comprehension, get some. Then read my first paragraph (which you even quoted). Here's a clue for you since you not only lack one, you are working very hard to avoid obtaining one: Just what the **** do you think the basic safety precation I mention in the first paragraph is meant to deal with? I even _explicitly_ adress pressure and temperature rises. Learn to ****ing read. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
MSNBC (Oberg) -- NASA addresses fears about space fire hazard
Fred J. McCall wrote:
Which "large adiabatic compression" would that be, Ed? I would expect pressure to be going the OTHER way when you're talking about an O2 line like that. The stuff starts out compressed and is going to LOWER pressures as it exits the line... It may be "cooling" on the source O2, but the destination tank will get warm as its pressure rises. If the regulator is before the line to the destination tank, then the pressure inside the line will (eventually) follow that of the tank and rise as the pressure rises in the tank and that means the line would be warm. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
MSNBC (Oberg) -- NASA addresses fears about space fire hazard
"Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!)" wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:27:00 GMT, in sci.space.policy (Derek Lyons) wrote: Here's a clue for you since you not only lack one, you are working very hard to avoid obtaining one: Just what the **** do you think the basic safety precation I mention in the first paragraph is meant to deal with? I even _explicitly_ adress pressure and temperature rises. Learn to ****ing read. Here's the whole OP: When you have to brag about how safe you are - your safety culture is _still_ broken. Not to mention "the valve will now be opened slowly to prevent a sharp pressure/velocity rise". Huh? That's a *basic* safety precaution for working with pressurized gases. If first learned it thirty years ago working in a bicycle shop! Where has NASA been? D. Where is temperature specifically mentioned? Just what do you think is the result of the pressure/velocity rise? have you never heard of the Diesel effect? D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|