|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Experiment on Comets Orbits Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1496 ATOMTOTALITY 5th ed
Alright, I vaguely remember learning Comets for the first time in High
School in the 1960s as having parabolic orbits. Today I do not know if that is true. I see the orbits as highly elliptical in Kaufmann's textbook Universe 1985. So here I want to begin an experiment that if you have a Oort Cloud with the Sun as the center of the entire cloud and have a Solar gravity cell that spins in space in solid body rotation of 72.5 days for 1 complete revolution, and whether a comet pinned to that Oort Cloud would be taking on a near parabolic orbit. So we have a picture of bodies in space as comets in a orbit around the Sun due to the gravity cell spinning at 72.5 days for a complete turn and whether that spinning would create the comet to go on a different orbit to make a close encounter with Sun or Jupiter? I believe so, because of what astronomers in the past missed. The fact of the Sun's 220km/sec motion in space creates the Solar Apex, the front-motion of the Sun in Space. That Solar Apex would cause a change in the orbit of comets in the the Solar Apex direction and those comets would then have an altered orbit. So here we can devise a simple experiment to see if math geometry provides us with Comet orbits as parabolic or elliptical and otherwise stable orbits, all due to the fact of Solar gravity cell and Solar Apex. -- Google seems to have stopped doing author-archives as of 2012. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author- archiving of AP posts to sci.math for the past several years as seen he http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
predicting when comets are inbound Experiment on Comets OrbitsChapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1498 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
On Apr 13, 3:50Â*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote: (snipped) Funny how neither Newtonian gravity nor General Relativity can predict orbits of comets and why some comets return and others never return. But let me outline how EM-gravity can predict comets. So in this experiment we use the Solar Apex which is the leading front edge of the Sun moving in space at 220km/sec. The Sun is the fastest moving astro body in our Solar System, not counting man-made objects. So if Newtonian gravity or General Relativity were true and not fake theories, they would have to explain how it is that the Sun can move at 220km/sec yet a slow object like Earth at 29km/sec can keep up with the Sun and in fact circle the Sun. A person with commonsense would think the Earth needs to be at least 249km/sec in order to circle the Sun. So now suppose we have a circle orbit and we begin to pick up that circle and move the circle from where we pick it up and as we drag it along we change that circle into a ellipse. The dragging along changes the circle to become an ellipse. The same idea with comets. Only instead of picking up the Comet orbit, we examine how the Solar Apex moving towards the comet, alters the comet's orbit. Now as the planets are further from the Sun, their circular orbits become more and more elliptical. This is shown in Kaufmann's text Universe, 1985 on pages 98-99. We see Uranus, Neptune and Pluto more and more stretched out of a circle and now an elongated ellipse, especially Pluto. Now in that picture of Kaufmann, where the ellipse of Neptune and Pluto have the largest curvature inward is where the Solar Apex is heading for in that direction. In other words, the Solar Apex causes the greatest curvature bend of Pluto and Neptune and Uranus. Now, picture a comet far far away in the Oort Cloud. The Sun holds the comet locked gravitationally by the Solar gravity cell which is a huge sphere out to the Oort Cloud and is forming the Space, forming it of magnetic monopoles, and it is spinning on an axis that coincides with the Sun's axis but stretches out to the Oort Cloud and makes one complete solid body revolution in 72.5 days. This spinning allows Mercury at 47km/sec to remain locked with the Sun and all the other planets and astro bodies, and keeps them locked to the Sun and not straying away after a few years. EM-gravity keeps the planets to the Sun even though the Sun is the fastest moving object. If Newtonian gravity or General Relativity were true, then the Solar System would have disappeared after 10 years. Now, think of that lonely comet far out in the Oort Cloud with its elliptical orbit, and this special comet is one in which is directly in the front forward path of the Solar Apex. Imagine Pluto in the direct path of the Sun when Pluto is at the maximum bend in its orbit. It would cause Pluto to slightly change orbit into a more circular since the Sun is closer to Pluto. Because the Sun is moving at 220km sec and Pluto is moving at merely 4.7 km/sec, the Solar Apex alters the orbit of Pluto when it is directly in the line of motion of the Sun and makes Pluto more circular of an orbit than previously. The same situation with a comet when directly at the steepest curve in its elliptical orbit and directly at the Solar Apex would alter the orbit of the comet into a more circular orbit. When this happens to the comet, its orbit is altered enough to be more circular that it becomes inbound into the Solar Ecliptic and may crash into the Sun or perhaps Jupiter. So, in this manner we begin to see a stable bunch of comets in the Oort Cloud and stable until the Solar Apex alters their orbit that their orbit becomes more circular and changing their orbit to trespass into the Solar Ecliptic. -- Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio, sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen here : http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jupiter is a pulsar (2002 proof) and caused by EM-gravity on itspoles Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1484 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 10th 13 06:15 PM |
Binary stars prove that Gravity-cells exist Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells#1481 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 9th 13 09:23 PM |
Solar gravity cell spins at 72.5 days for 1 revolution; Modern dayAntikythera Mechanism Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1473 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | April 6th 13 07:10 AM |
Gravity cells to patch up the Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.14 mathematicsof the force of gravity #1446 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 31st 13 08:19 AM |