|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
rotation of planets
Hi,
I was wondering why there is so little information about rotation of planets. One of my friends asked me this interesting question. Where did the rotational motion for the planets originate from? As far as I can think, it could be the sum of angular momentum gathered by the constituents during their formation I would be happy to see some references to the subject. Another corollary is, why all the planets are round? Do irregular objects with uneven torques on the surface area due to rotation will eventually become round are some of the things that came to my mind. Also, is there anything like gyroscopic stability that is necessary to keep them in orbit. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
rotation of planets
In article ,
Ravi wrote: Hi, I was wondering why there is so little information about rotation of planets. One of my friends asked me this interesting question. Where did the rotational motion for the planets originate from? As far as I can think, it could be the sum of angular momentum gathered by the constituents during their formation Precisely! And the chance of the sum of the angular momentum being exactly zero is quite small. Therefore almost every celestial body has a rotation. I would be happy to see some references to the subject. Another corollary is, why all the planets are round? Because of gravity. However the celestial body must be large enough for this to have an effect. Therefore, small asteroids are frequently irregular in shape. Do irregular objects with uneven torques on the surface area due to rotation will eventually become round are some of the things that came to my mind. Suppose the Earth had a mountain some 1000 times taller than Mount Everest. What would happen to it? It would collapse under its own weight! A spherical shape is the equilibrium shape for a large body subjected to its own gravity. If the body rotates, the equilibrium shape changes to a spheroid instead - a spheroid is an ellipsoid with two of its three principial axes equally large. Also, is there anything like gyroscopic stability that is necessary to keep them in orbit. Nope! Gravity combined with inertia is enough. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stjarnhimlen dot se WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Galactic rotation | DX | Research | 2 | March 30th 08 09:57 AM |
defining planets; Pluto a planet and UB313; How the Atom Totality theory defines planets | a_plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 17th 06 11:29 AM |
Rotation formula | Kilolani | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | March 15th 04 09:05 PM |
Gas Planets Evolve to be Rock planets??? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 114 | October 16th 03 12:51 PM |
Counter clockwise rotation of planets? | Bill Duncan | Misc | 34 | October 6th 03 12:06 AM |