|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Twin Paradox General Relativity Solution
On Dec 6, 8:45 pm, waitedavidmsphysics wrote:
I've fixed a typo missing prime and reuploaded. The new URL is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8stc9OtTUOA for anyone, unlike the insane responders I've gotten in this thread, interested in the real GENERAL RELATIVISTIC physics applied to this spacetime, a frame transformation away from doing special relativity. The first take was garbage. Guess what? The second take is as well. shrug Note to the nutters, this is basic equivalence. Einstein was right. You're just wrong. Believe Him. These so-called nutters by you are not here to convince that you have been wrong but to tell you that you are wrong again. shrug Using acceleration to break the symmetry has long since been abandoned by the self-styled physicists. It sounds like someone is not exposed to the ridiculous cycle of make-belief resolution to the twins’ paradox. You can read all about it here. Each resolution to the twins’ paradox comes in four stages. How long each stage lasts depends on how tasty this resolution with its hypnotic appetite is. The stages a **** Desperation It must be very heart breaking for the Einstein Dingleberries to watch their beloved SR getting **** canned. shrug **** Hope This is more like false hope because the Einstein Dingleberries just cannot walk away from that pile of crap called SR. shrug **** Zealot Every day wishing for this false hope is going to trig the mind to believe in a false resolution. It does not matter how ****ed up or stupid the resolution is. As soon as the Einstein Dingleberries sink their teeth into this resolution, it is impossible to separate them from SR. Waiting for rapture is very much the only mental activity left. shrug **** Awakening After a while, the scientist in their id will be finally knocking on their consciousness. They will start to realize just how ****ing stupid they were with such zeal in their faith. shrug **** Desperation And the cycle begins. So, for the recap, we have gone through at least three such cycles so far. shrug **** Acceleration This crap was first proposed by Born by equating any acceleration with gravitational acceleration, and thus it inherits the nature of gravitational time dilation. To this day, there is not a piece of mathematical analysis that supports this resolution, and no single experiment has shown acceleration manifests time dilation. shrug **** Diagram Some idiots thought the twins’ paradox can be resolved by drawing a few lines in their so-called spacetime diagram. This resolution seems to have the least amount of survival time. There are almost no idiots following this one anymore. shrug **** MathemaGics Given the time transform of the Lorentz transform, the twins’ paradox actually involve two different set of the Lorentz transforms. The first set describes observers 1 and 2 observing 3. ** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s23] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2) And ** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s13] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2) Where ** dt1 = time flow rate of 1 ** [v12] = velocity of 2 as observed by 1 ** [s13] = displacement vector of 3 as observed by 1 ** All others self-explanatory The other set of the Lorentz transform is where 1 and 2 are observing 4: ** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s24] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2) And ** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s14] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2) Since there only two observers and each observer behaving as the observed, these two sets of the Lorentz transform above must be reduced with 3 and 4 merged appropriately into 1 and 2. So, taking one equation from each transform, we have ** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s23] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2) And ** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s14] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2) Then, it is easy to merge 3 into 2 and 4 into 1 from the two equations above. ** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s22] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2) And ** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s11] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2) Or ** dt1 = dt2 / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2) And ** dt2 = dt1 / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2) Where ** d[s11] = d[s22] = 0 Since the two equations above cannot possibly co-exist, the twins’ paradox becomes very real. However, the self-styled physicists possess no analytical skills. In this matheMagic show, they have demonstrated a lack of understanding in the Lorentz transform (as well as the Galilean transform). To reduce the Lorentz transform from two observers (1 and 2) and one observed (3 or 4) into just two observers (1 and 2) where each observer is observing the other, they decide to favor either 1 or 2 by using the same transform. Following through the mathemaGics, the Lorentz transform becomes: ** dt1 = (dt2 + [v12] * d[s22] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2) And ** dt2 = (dt1 + [v21] * d[s12] / c^2) / sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2) Or ** dt1 = dt2 / sqrt(1 – v12^2 / c^2) And ** dt2 = dt1 sqrt(1 – v21^2 / c^2) Where ** [v12] = - [v21] And thus avoiding the paradox through mathemaGics. **** Pathlength The latest crap to the resolution of the twins’ paradox calls out for the mythical substance called proper time. Although the scripture of SR dealing with this proper time went back since the time of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar, the myth of aging in proper time nevertheless is a modern hope of resolving the twins’ paradox. Some self-styled physicists are beginning to realize how ****ing stupid they have been by accepting this nonsense. shrug **** Conclusion So, realizing all resolutions so far are just hopeless, the self- styled physicists either ignore the twins’ paradox or go back to one of these resolutions. Jumping from resolution to another seems not to be getting old for these idiots. Fvcking sad, no? shrug The whole episode of SR and GR can be summarized as follows. ** FAITH IS THEORY ** LYING IS TEACHING ** NITWIT IS GENIUS ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE ** PARADOX IS KOSHER ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION ** BULL**** IS TRUTH ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS shrug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A CLUE TO THE TWIN PARADOX | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 20th 11 10:16 PM |
TWIN PARADOX OR TWIN ABSURDITY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 111 | November 25th 10 12:41 PM |
TWIN PARADOX OR TWIN ABSURDITY? | Androcles[_33_] | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | November 2nd 10 04:12 PM |
2/1 EXPERIMENT AND THE TWIN PARADOX | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 16 | January 8th 09 05:39 PM |
The twin paradox revisited | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | July 10th 07 08:19 PM |