|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt14 Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space = gravity #107 AtomTotality theory 5th ed.
Fortunately in the last chapter of the Solid Body Rotation, I had to
rewrite that entire chapter because I learned an important thing in this edition. I learned that the Missing Mass problem was not due to Solid Body Rotation observations. In other words there is no missing mass in the Cosmos and that all the physicists before me were wrongly interpreting the observations. All the physicists and cosmologists were looking into the skies and seeing Solid Body Rotation. That is alright, but the next step of interpreting solid body rotation was a wrong step in that they thence concluded missing mass. I too, myself, fell into that misinterpretation trap from 1990 to November 2011. But thankfully the lights came on for me last month, in that I realized that the Solid Body Rotation was not going to be answered by a missing mass or "found missing mass", because gravity and mass are not going to create a group of stars performing solid body rotation nor is a group of galaxies performing solid body rotation is not created by more mass and its gravity. The insight I learned in November was that Solid Body Rotation occurs in Nature, only from the Electric Magnetism force in operation. The key insight I learned last month was that Solid Body Rotation means the entire Cosmos is operating not on gravity but on a Cosmic Electro-Magnetism force. There is no way that mass and gravity can spin your phonograph record player in solid body rotation, and only an electric motor has enough force to spin that record player in solid body rotation. So as you can well sense, that took the winds out of my sail in the last chapter, where I ended up discarding missing mass altogether. But that discovery of a Cosmic EM forces is also impacting this chapter where Space = ocean of positrons = gravity. Now this picture is made easy by the GR idea that mass bends space and other mass follows the curvature of that bent space. That much of the picture is given by the old-physics. But GR alone cannot explain solid body rotation and we have to scrap GR because it fails to explain solid body rotation. And so, we have to assemble the Cosmic motions around that of EM and explain all the motions via EM. So here is a first attempt. In the new picture, Space itself is positron antimatter and where all the other matter is regular matter of the last 6 electrons of the Atom Totality. The electrons are matter that is the electron-dot-cloud, where each dot is a galaxy. And if we were to put all the dots together into one lump sum we would have 6 electrons of the 231Pu Atom Totality. Now we know that the galaxies, stars, planets are electrically neutral overall. So that the 6 last electrons of the Atom Totality are matter that is electrically neutral. But if we were to compress all of Space into a lump sum, what we end up with is a ball of positrons. This further implies there is a Atom Totality Nucleus where most of the mass of the Cosmic Atom resides. Since the electron mass is overall neutral, the Nuclear mass should also be overall neutral. So let me try to explain how the Sun keeps Earth in orbit. The Sun is kept in place in the Milky Way Galaxy and it in turn is kept in place by the attraction of photons and neutrinos shot from the Nucleus, the EM attraction. And the Sun holds Earth in revolution by the tiny ball of positrons that forms in the center of the Sun. This Sun positron ball is the largest in the Solar System. And the empty space of our Solar System is not empty space but is a diffusion of positrons making it a space. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
stories of Franklin and Faraday Chapt14 Dirac's Ocean ofPositrons = Space = gravity #108 Atom Totality theory 5th ed.
Now let me interpose two true historical stories in here that are
related to this topic of Space = ocean positrons = gravity. History in science is able to make the ideas more clear to the reader and so I like to interject history as much as possible. The story was that, as seen in The Mechanical Universe series, that when Oersted found that an electric current in a wire can deflect a magnetic compass needle and when it was reported to Faraday, that almost instantly Faraday perceived the correct reason why it deflected. The second story is, as seen in The Mechanical Universe series, that Ben Franklin was trying to conceive of the force equation of electricity and magnetism and trying to use the Newton force equation of gravity, but as the story goes, the repulsion denied Franklin the equation and that Coulomb then found the equation. Now I wonder, if Faraday had been alive and working in 1990 and a report came in to him saying that some stars and some galaxies performed solid-body- rotation, would the genius of Faraday have instantly said "aha, the cosmic force at work here is the Electromagnetic force and not the force of gravity". Faraday was so brilliant of physics that he was immediately able to explain the Oersted result, and perhaps Faraday was the only one at that time to explain it correctly. And that deflection of the compass needle is solid-body-rotation, the same as the solid- body-rotation of the globular clusters and the galactic clusters. I myself had to spend and take 21 years before it dawned on me that the correct interpretation of solid body rotation, was not this silly and stupid search for missing mass, but was to realize that the predominant cosmic force working on the scale of the Cosmos was EM force and not gravity. Would Faraday have taken 21 years to realize the same, or would he have instantly recognized it? As for the Ben Franklin story, we had gravity as given by Newton and there was Franklin trying to turn the inverse square law into electricity-magnetism law but what frustrated him was that there is repulsion along with attraction, and then Coulomb resolved the problem. What I want to point out is the irony of it all, in that Franklin and Coulomb were using Newton gravity, and here in 2011, I am going in the opposite direction of throwing away gravity by using EM as the true force. You see, Franklin and Coulomb based their search on Newton gravity being true to erect a EM force, and I am doing the opposite in basing EM as the true law that replaces gravity. Where I need both attraction but also repulsion to do away with gravity. Where Space and Matter interact and this EM interaction gives us the force of gravity. It happens a lot in physics where we seem to think the direction of truth is one way, going from Newton gravity to Coulomb EM, but in time we see that going from EM to gravity is the more truthful route. In the Atom Totality theory the force of gravity disappears in that it was never a force, but only a "effect of Electromagnetism". Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
evidence that the entire Cosmos is solid body rotation Chapt14Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space = gravity #109 Atom Totality theory 5th ed.
So far in Cosmology there is evidence of solid body rotation in groups of stars or globular clusters and there is evidence of solid body rotation in groups of galaxies, but is there evidence of solid body rotation for the entire Cosmos? I believe the answer is a resounding yes. Now I forgotten which one of these, whether Juric or Jarrett point out a ring in the 3rd level, a ring of the galaxies and where the author remarks whether he does not know if the "Ring" is a effect from the observations or whether the ring is a Cosmic fact. http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~mjur...rse/all100.gif http://www.astro.princeton.edu/universe/ http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff...tt/papers/LSS/ What that Ring maybe, is the observance of a Cosmic Solid-Body- Rotation. And if it is, then it is the edge of the 5f6 of the 231Pu Atom Totality, and all the other galaxies mapped by Juric and Jarrett are closer to Earth than this cosmic ring. The thing about Juric and Jarrett's mapping is that their mapping is mostly incorrect for they rely on the assumption of Redshift as distance, and that is a false assumption. But the Ring structure is true and marks the edge of the observable Universe where all the galaxies at that distance are doing a Solid-Body-Rotation. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt14 Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space = gravity #107 AtomTotality theory 5th ed.
On Dec 4, 12:25*am, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote: But thankfully the lights came on for me last month, in that I realized that the Solid Body Rotation was not going to be answered by a missing mass or "found missing mass", because gravity and mass are not going to create a group of stars performing solid body rotation nor is a group of galaxies performing solid body rotation is not created by more mass and its gravity. The insight I learned in November was that Solid Body Rotation occurs in Nature, only from the Electric Magnetism force in operation. seems like you're learning a lot by observing the rotation of your poo, Archie. PPJ. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
plane of ecliptic better explained Chapt14 Dirac's Ocean of Positrons= Space (and tells us what gravity is) #106 Atom Totality theory 5th ed. | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 2nd 11 07:33 AM |
Chapt14 Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space (and tells us what gravityis) #104 Atom Totality theory 5th ed. | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | December 2nd 11 06:25 AM |
Gravity is Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space #356 Atom Totalitytheory 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 7th 11 06:08 AM |
Gravity is Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space #355 Atom Totalitytheory 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 6th 11 07:15 AM |
Gravity is Dirac's Ocean of Positrons = Space #353 Atom Totalitytheory 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 5th 11 07:45 PM |