|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tidal drag spindown time
I'm looking for a formula that can tell me the spindown time for rotating
planets subject to a single perturbing body. For example, an equation telling me how much time would be needed to reduce the frequency of rotation by 1/e, or 1/2, would be nice. Does anybody know of one? It will be helpful in detailing the physical characteristics of stars that can have a habitable planet or a binary planet of which both components are habitable. Jerry Abbott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Jerry Abbott" wrote in message ... I'm looking for a formula that can tell me the spindown time for rotating planets subject to a single perturbing body. For example, an equation telling me how much time would be needed to reduce the frequency of rotation by 1/e, or 1/2, would be nice. Does anybody know of one? It will be helpful in detailing the physical characteristics of stars that can have a habitable planet or a binary planet of which both components are habitable. Probably not. First of all, we can BARELY can tell if there's planets. And we can only calculate mass of stars etc. to certain extent. Then you have to include other influences such as photons, magnetism, molecules, meteor, other planets etc. as well as drag and thermo effect if rotation is slow... Then material planets are made of, things like liquid like earth must affect this. But you can look at our solar system, to know that everything will likely to be spinning. It seems there's other factor making calculation too... http://www.aas.org/publications/baas.../dps98/320.htm Jerry Abbott |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Jerry Abbott" wrote in message ... I'm looking for a formula that can tell me the spindown time for rotating planets subject to a single perturbing body. For example, an equation telling me how much time would be needed to reduce the frequency of rotation by 1/e, or 1/2, would be nice. Does anybody know of one? It will be helpful in detailing the physical characteristics of stars that can have a habitable planet or a binary planet of which both components are habitable. Probably not. First of all, we can BARELY can tell if there's planets. And we can only calculate mass of stars etc. to certain extent. Then you have to include other influences such as photons, magnetism, molecules, meteor, other planets etc. as well as drag and thermo effect if rotation is slow... Then material planets are made of, things like liquid like earth must affect this. But you can look at our solar system, to know that everything will likely to be spinning. It seems there's other factor making calculation too... http://www.aas.org/publications/baas.../dps98/320.htm Jerry Abbott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. | Robert | Astronomy Misc | 133 | August 30th 04 01:31 AM |
Earth rotation | don findlay | Astronomy Misc | 122 | July 9th 04 07:57 PM |
Pioneer 10 anomaly: Galileo, Ulysses? | James Harris | Astronomy Misc | 58 | January 28th 04 11:15 PM |
Empirically Confirmed Superluminal Velocities? | Robert Clark | Astronomy Misc | 42 | November 11th 03 03:43 AM |
Wesley Clark Support Warp Drive, Time Travel | Mark R. Whittington | Policy | 97 | October 17th 03 03:10 AM |