What is wrong with the word creationism?

On Friday, October 31, 2014 1:30:35 PM UTC-7, Rocky wrote:
What is wrong with the word creationism?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism

The word "creationism" makes people think there was a starting point to life
but what if real life has always been? That would mean there are cycles and
not starts.

Just a thought for those that might think they know where the end leads.
G

Rocky


Better to use the words "Intelligent Design".

Double-A

"Double-A" wrote in message
...
On Friday, October 31, 2014 1:30:35 PM UTC-7, Rocky wrote:
What is wrong with the word creationism?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism

The word "creationism" makes people think there was a starting point to
life
but what if real life has always been? That would mean there are cycles
and
not starts.

Just a thought for those that might think they know where the end leads.
G

Rocky


Better to use the words "Intelligent Design".

Double-A

Whatever. As long as things move in cycles instead of start and end.

On Saturday, November 1, 2014 1:12:17 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
On 11/01/2014 01:28 PM, HVAC wrote:
On 10/31/2014 6:20 PM, Rocky wrote:

Better to use the words "Intelligent Design".

Double-A

Whatever. As long as things move in cycles instead of start and end.


Well, there was a beginning. We can describe the conditions that existed
a billionth of a second after the big bang. The eventual fate of our
universe, according to all the physics we understand at this time, will
be an infinite expansion towards infinite entropy.

Nothing is infinite (save human stupidity)


well then something is, then, eh?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/

On Sunday, November 16, 2014 7:49:28 AM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:
"HVAC" wrote in message
...
On 10/31/2014 6:20 PM, Rocky wrote:

Better to use the words "Intelligent Design".

Double-A

Whatever. As long as things move in cycles instead of start and end.


Well, there was a beginning. We can describe the conditions that existed a
billionth of a second after the big bang. The eventual fate of our
universe, according to all the physics we understand at this time, will be
an infinite expansion towards infinite entropy.

ROTFLMAO because what is more important than what happened a billionth of a
second after the big bang is what happened a billionth of a second before
the big bang.

I hate to be the one to tell you this since you might have problems with it
but the universe as you know it has a beginning and an end but don't worry
since something will continue to restart the cycle.

Rocky


And that "something" is called ..... ?

Double-A