Some real facts about Global Warming ...

Conclusion: No significant change in the past 60 years.

By Professor Roger Pielke, Jr., a real professor and not
one of those wannabe, brainless hockeystick theory junkies.

http://www.thegwpf.org/roger-pielke-...imate-weather/

On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:41:48 AM UTC-8, Hägar wrote:
Conclusion: No significant change in the past 60 years.

By Professor Roger Pielke, Jr., a real professor and not
one of those wannabe, brainless hockeystick theory junkies.

http://www.thegwpf.org/roger-pielke-...imate-weather/

How many consecutive months of November have it as warming?

http://blogs.mprnews.org/updraft/201...onth-globally/

http://www.climatecentral.org/news/n...ge-temps-15361

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3624969.html

And you were saying?

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:41:48 AM UTC-8, Hägar wrote:
Conclusion: No significant change in the past 60 years.

By Professor Roger Pielke, Jr., a real professor and not
one of those wannabe, brainless hockeystick theory junkies.

http://www.thegwpf.org/roger-pielke-...imate-weather/

How many consecutive months of November have it as warming?

http://blogs.mprnews.org/updraft/201...onth-globally/

http://www.climatecentral.org/news/n...ge-temps-15361

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3624969.html

And you were saying?


*** I am saying that "real" Scientists are saying "No significant change in
the past 60 years".

The Huffington post and the State of Minnesota weather bureau hardly
qualify as reliable sources, not to mention that you idiots measure this
stuff to three decimals after the period, which is as good as a wild-ass
guess.

Perhaps this will calm you down, Goth:
http://www.thegwpf.org/roger-pielke-...imate-weather/

On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:53:32 AM UTC-8, Hägar wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...

On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:41:48 AM UTC-8, H�gar wrote:

Conclusion: No significant change in the past 60 years.



By Professor Roger Pielke, Jr., a real professor and not

one of those wannabe, brainless hockeystick theory junkies.



http://www.thegwpf.org/roger-pielke-...imate-weather/



How many consecutive months of November have it as warming?



http://blogs.mprnews.org/updraft/201...onth-globally/



http://www.climatecentral.org/news/n...ge-temps-15361



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0..._3624969..html



And you were saying?





*** I am saying that "real" Scientists are saying "No significant change in

the past 60 years".



The Huffington post and the State of Minnesota weather bureau hardly

qualify as reliable sources, not to mention that you idiots measure this

stuff to three decimals after the period, which is as good as a wild-ass

guess.



Perhaps this will calm you down, Goth:

http://www.thegwpf.org/roger-pielke-...imate-weather/

Why of course, any consecutive warming is strictly faking it, even though tabulated from dozens of independent sources.

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...

On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:53:32 AM UTC-8, Hägar wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...

On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:41:48 AM UTC-8, H�gar wrote:

Conclusion: No significant change in the past 60 years.



By Professor Roger Pielke, Jr., a real professor and not

one of those wannabe, brainless hockeystick theory junkies.



http://www.thegwpf.org/roger-pielke-...imate-weather/



How many consecutive months of November have it as warming?



http://blogs.mprnews.org/updraft/201...onth-globally/



http://www.climatecentral.org/news/n...ge-temps-15361



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3624969.html



And you were saying?





*** I am saying that "real" Scientists are saying "No significant change
in

the past 60 years".



The Huffington post and the State of Minnesota weather bureau hardly

qualify as reliable sources, not to mention that you idiots measure this

stuff to three decimals after the period, which is as good as a wild-ass

guess.



Perhaps this will calm you down, Goth:

http://www.thegwpf.org/roger-pielke-...imate-weather/

Why of course, any consecutive warming is strictly faking it, even though
tabulated from dozens of independent sources.


*** When issued by like minded basket cases ... absolutely.

On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:41:48 AM UTC-8, Hägar wrote:
Conclusion: No significant change in the past 60 years.



By Professor Roger Pielke, Jr., a real professor and not

one of those wannabe, brainless hockeystick theory junkies.



http://www.thegwpf.org/roger-pielke-...imate-weather/

Greenland is currently losing 150 km3/year, and the NOVA televised forensics is offering the objective science and the documentation that puts your global cooling ruse into the nearest toilet in spite of the recent cold snap of this winter season.

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:41:48 AM UTC-8, Hägar wrote:
Conclusion: No significant change in the past 60 years.



By Professor Roger Pielke, Jr., a real professor and not

one of those wannabe, brainless hockeystick theory junkies.



http://www.thegwpf.org/roger-pielke-...imate-weather/

Greenland is currently losing 150 km3/year, and the NOVA televised
forensics is offering the objective science and the documentation that puts
your global cooling ruse into the nearest toilet in spite of the recent
cold snap of this winter season.



*** You idiot ... NOVA is to television what the Huffington Post is to the
Liberal Drive-by Media.
Only a dumb-ass like you would take their drivel as
gospel ... but then, you are retarded.

On Thursday, December 19, 2013 12:55:08 PM UTC-8, Hägar wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...

On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:41:48 AM UTC-8, H�gar wrote:

Conclusion: No significant change in the past 60 years.







By Professor Roger Pielke, Jr., a real professor and not



one of those wannabe, brainless hockeystick theory junkies.







http://www.thegwpf.org/roger-pielke-...imate-weather/



Greenland is currently losing 150 km3/year, and the NOVA televised

forensics is offering the objective science and the documentation that puts

your global cooling ruse into the nearest toilet in spite of the recent

cold snap of this winter season.



*** You idiot ... NOVA is to television what the Huffington Post is to the
Liberal Drive-by Media.

Only a dumb-ass like you would take their drivel as
gospel ... but then, you are retarded.

In other words, of anything that doesn't support your global cooling is spewed by conspiracy whack jobs as having nothing verifiable or much less forensic and objective to go by. Isn't that about right?