|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Alternative to mathematical quantum notions
It is fortunate that the wider world protects itself from intellectually damaging notions that are called counter-intuitive by mathematicians but really are contrived rubbish. It is clear that academics can and do promote impossibilities for their own ends however it disrupts genuine faculties that humans need to exercise even when they are starved of them by disruptive voodoo that entertains mathematicians.
The real alternative is whether there are elements in nature that can be simultaneously be both ordered and disordered either in a geometric or arithmetic way. The Pi and Phi proportions are examples of this ordered/random structure insofar as although the digits extend to infinity without repeating, as a pattern the disordered structure represents a geometric quality. At first glance, especially with the Phi proportion, this ordered/random sequence wouldn't appear to have a specific destination but with so much of nature displaying patterns consistent with the Phi proportion it turns out that it does. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio All that wave/particle duality crap distracts from what humans can deal with via experience and the fact that non periodicity has always resonated with humanity in terms of beauty and efficiency is all the more reason for society to rid itself of intellectual monstrosities. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Alternative to mathematical quantum notions
On Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 11:29:43 AM UTC-6, Gerald Kelleher wrote:
All that wave/particle duality crap distracts from what humans can deal with via experience and the fact that non periodicity has always resonated with humanity in terms of beauty and efficiency is all the more reason for society to rid itself of intellectual monstrosities. While quasiperiodic tilings are beautiful, I don't see how you're going to use them to explain, say, the result of the double-slit experiment. John Savard |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Alternative to mathematical quantum notions
A brief digression is necessary before presenting an alternative balance centered around observations where natural forms are neither ordered nor disordered as opposed to the impossible and the extreme duality that entertain mathematicians and their followers concerning geometry.
The non-periodicity of the arithmetic Pi represents the relationship between diameter and circumference where a radius represents a new diameter within this structure. In other words if you can create a circumference from a diameter it holds that there is also a radius. This was covered nearly two decades ago at a time when celebrity physicists would show up in the newsgroups - (John Baez) wrote in message ... In article , Oriel36 wrote something like: For those who prize logic, this Planck length is the funniest thing; seeing that this thread covers a wide range of groups it is worthwhile posting a simple geometric refutation. Draw a circumference around a Planck length, the circumference being of course 3.141 times greater than the length, if you can determine a circumference you can also determine a radius which is half the original length and from this discrete length you begin again constructing a circumference around this half Planck length. What you get geometrically is a form of the Zeno paradox and you guys take the Planck length seriously! [Actually this sort of argument goes back to the "Mutakallimun", Jewish and Islamic philosopher/theologians of the 10th and 11th centuries AD. Many of these were very fond of atomism, taking it beyond Democritus to argue that *everything* was made of discrete units - even space and time. Others brought forth certain paradoxes to disprove this. John Baez]" There is no lower limit to length otherwise Pi would possess a periodic arithmetic or geometry would disappear altogether as a discipline. Two decades on from pointing this out and with a much softer overview of how the narrative developed I can't say I feel sorry for mathematicians but I do realise that it was a time when academics were trying to escape the confines of the clockwork solar system by putting experimentation and mathematics at the heart of physical sciences including the celestial arena. The alternative approach based on a balance between order and random does not reach for extremes nevertheless it has all the properties of complex and intricate relationships that some people are comfortable dealing with. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Alternative to mathematical quantum notions
On 30/08/2018 08:42, Gerald Kelleher wrote:
A brief digression is necessary before presenting an alternative balance centered around observations where natural forms are neither ordered nor disordered as opposed to the impossible and the extreme duality that entertain mathematicians and their followers concerning geometry. The non-periodicity of the arithmetic Pi represents the relationship between diameter and circumference where a radius represents a new diameter within this structure. In other words if you can create a circumference from a diameter it holds that there is also a radius. This was covered nearly two decades ago at a time when celebrity physicists would show up in the newsgroups - (John Baez) wrote in message ... In article , Oriel36 wrote something like: For those who prize logic, this Planck length is the funniest thing; seeing that this thread covers a wide range of groups it is worthwhile posting a simple geometric refutation. Draw a circumference around a Planck length, the circumference being of course 3.141 times greater than the length, if you can determine a circumference you can also determine a radius which is half the original length and from this discrete length you begin again constructing a circumference around this half Planck length. What you get geometrically is a form of the Zeno paradox and you guys take the Planck length seriously! [Actually this sort of argument goes back to the "Mutakallimun", Jewish and Islamic philosopher/theologians of the 10th and 11th centuries AD. Many of these were very fond of atomism, taking it beyond Democritus to argue that *everything* was made of discrete units - even space and time. Others brought forth certain paradoxes to disprove this. John Baez]" There is no lower limit to length otherwise Pi would possess a periodic arithmetic or geometry would disappear altogether as a discipline. Two decades on from pointing this out and with a much softer overview of how the narrative developed I can't say I feel sorry for mathematicians but I do realise that it was a time when academics were trying to escape the confines of the clockwork solar system by putting experimentation and mathematics at the heart of physical sciences including the celestial arena. The alternative approach based on a balance between order and random does not reach for extremes nevertheless it has all the properties of complex and intricate relationships that some people are comfortable dealing with. You have a wonderful way with word salad. Your utterances are invariant under the application of the Shannonizer which is very unusual. Most people manage to communicate something in their Usenet postings. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Alternative to mathematical quantum notions
On Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 9:24:16 AM UTC+1, Martin Brown wrote:
You have a wonderful way with word salad. Your utterances are invariant under the application of the Shannonizer which is very unusual. Most people manage to communicate something in their Usenet postings. -- Regards, Martin Brown Coming from someone who can't manage to correlate one sunrise and one sunset each 24 hour day with one 360 degree rotation of the Earth I would say that your usual declarations have all the effects of a breeze on a mountain. " It is a fact not generally known that,owing to the difference between solar and sidereal time,the Earth rotates upon its axis once more often than there are days in the year" NASA /Harvard Anyway, back to the topic, despite the nonsense of mathematicians there is no lower or higher geometric limit in nature, at least not without destroying the ordered/random balance contained within the Pi value and its geometric relation between circumference, diameter and radius. It is this ordered/random balance that surfaces more as the Phi proportion in nature than concerns people who enjoy where it emerges throughout existence in small and large objects - http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted...ci/fibnat.html This is far removed from the wave/particle duality crap that is a pathetic assault on geometry and reason and the fact that lower geometric limits by which the quantum voodoo merchants operate are so easily dismissed is good news for everyone else and especially observers of terrestrial sciences and the celestial arena. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Alternative to mathematical quantum notions
It would be nice if these nuisances kept to themselves or fu)ked off to sci..astro.research where they can be among their own where zero astronomy is practised unlike here where,at least, the magnification hobby sometimes shows itself.
Relativity and quantum voodoo are impossible notions, one is supposed to deal with motions too fast for normal human perception or the other the ultra small which is also beyond human perception. The whole thing is packaged as astronomy but is just noise that gives a few academics a self aggrandizing lifestyle and their followers who know no better. Too dull and dour to be of any use, it is easier to post information here and leave the intellectual equivalent of 'brexiteers' and their wishful thinking to their own devices along with the usual colonists who know no better.. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Alternative to mathematical quantum notions
On Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 1:42:57 AM UTC-6, Gerald Kelleher wrote:
There is no lower limit to length otherwise Pi would possess a periodic arithmetic or geometry would disappear altogether as a discipline. There is no geometrical lower limit to length. But it does not follow that there is no physical lower limit to length. Euclidean geometry might not correspond, in this respect, to the physical world - just as its lack of intrinsic curvature is contradicted wherever gravity is present. John Savard |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Alternative to mathematical quantum notions
The ordered/random balance in the Pi proportion has limited use other than breaking any perceived upper or lower geometric limit including the number of sides that begin with an evolution from a triangle then square then pentagon, hexagon and the tendency towards a perfect circle.
The Phi proportion is a more productive ground for investigation for the four angles that create non periodic balance act like geometric DNA for something exquisite. Although they are presented as rhombs, much like chemicals in DNA, it is their interaction that matters - http://www.scienceu.com/geometry/art...nrosetiles.gif http://www.math.ubc.ca/~cass/courses...omb%20tile.gif Easier to work with the relevance of this fivefold symmetry as angles rather than their physical equivalent of quasicrystals. I had found a geometry where the angles point towards the reason why the Phi proportion resonates with both efficiency and beauty. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Quasicrystal People who have spent their lives turning astronomy and terrestrial sciences on their head would always be prevented from engaging with the narrative where the ordered/random balance prevails and this planet is always saturated with this geometry. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Alternative to mathematical quantum notions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Quasicrystal
About 28 years ago I was faced with a geometric representation anchored in the 432 degree value. At first I considered the 'black hole' solution in terms of infinite density/zero volume but the SN1987A event changed all that - http://cdn.spacetelescope.org/archiv...n/opo9714e.jpg This assumes that not all stars fade away after a supernova event but rather a supernova represents a transition phase that gives birth to a solar system. It puts humanity in a closer relationship to our parent star in terms of stellar and planetary evolution by inference derived from the structure of the SN1987A structure. Whether quasicrystal growth or stellar evolution, creation has a common thread to it in geometric form so while stellar evolution remains one of the bright spots in academic circles there is no mechanism to explain SN1987A rings in context of stellar evolution nor antecedent supernova stars like Eta Carinae - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...EtaCarinae.jpg I am comfortable with meshing small and large scale structures together under a common geometric principle unlike the handwringing of the pseudo-intellectual pursuit of relativity/quantum notions which is preposterous in content and character. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two Irreconcilable Notions of Time in Physics: Schizophrenia? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 25th 17 09:52 PM |
The Black Star Is Born: a quantum based alternative to blackholes! | jughead | Misc | 1 | October 12th 09 06:50 AM |
The Quantum of Mass, The Quantum of Time and The Quantum of Length | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | October 19th 07 07:17 AM |
Nonsense leading to idotic notions | Aladar | Astronomy Misc | 54 | May 26th 04 03:15 PM |