|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#511
|
|||
|
|||
Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:36:08 -0500, "Robert J. Kolker"
wrote: What you get from American Moslems, by and large is "yes...but" How could you possibly know that? -- "A politician's neck should always have a noose around it. It keeps him upright." -Robert Heinlein |
#512
|
|||
|
|||
Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:40:21 -0500, "Robert J. Kolker"
wrote: Parts of the US operate under what is called "codified common law". Texas is one of them. Article IV says the Constitution overrides such law. Article VI says +++ This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. +++ The operative words are "the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance of the US Constitution". If laws are unconstitutional, the states are not bound by them. RTFM. Article IV, the Supremacy Clause. You RTFM. From Wikipedia: "Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the United States Constitution is known as the Supremacy Clause" Also cite a source of Common Law so we can check out your assertions. Texas Penal Code. -- "A politician's neck should always have a noose around it. It keeps him upright." -Robert Heinlein |
#513
|
|||
|
|||
Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:41:58 -0500, "Robert J. Kolker"
wrote: The business of the U.S. should be nation wrecking... It's doing a fine job of that domestically right now. A good peaceful Iraq is a dead Iraq which glows blue at night. There are many people in the world who say the same about Israel. -- "A politician's neck should always have a noose around it. It keeps him upright." -Robert Heinlein |
#514
|
|||
|
|||
Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 10:40:17 -0500, "Robert J. Kolker"
wrote: It ought to be. I believe wars should be fought to the utmost destruction of the enemy. The idea is to permit no sons, grandsons and greatgrandsons from seeking revenge. While total genocide is impossible, ninety percent should be acheivable. Enough to cripple the other side for two to three generations. Then the same thing can be done again and again and again. So forgiveness, no forgetting. If the Holocaust proved anything, it was that genocide results in the strengthening of the gene pool of the oppressed group. The reason is quite simple - the weak are the ones who get killed off, while the strong escape being killed. Do the math. The best way to strengthen the gene pool is to become the target of genocide. -- "A politician's neck should always have a noose around it. It keeps him upright." -Robert Heinlein |
#515
|
|||
|
|||
Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
Bob wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:47:25 -0500, "Robert J. Kolker" wrote: Syllogism implies logic. The use of clear and correct logic is foreign to Bob of Texas. He uses Texas logic: accept my conclusion or I will shoot you. That is as strange thing to say, especially from someone who advocates genocide. In self defense. Rembember, Rembember the eleventh of september. I saw the Jihad Meme manifest fully. Time to eliminte it. The Jihad Meme programs otherwise normal humans to be killers. Bob Kolker |
#516
|
|||
|
|||
Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
Atlas Bugged wrote:
War isn't genocide. If a nation aggressively attacks another because the "Robert J. Kolker" wrote in message ... It ought to be. I believe wars should be fought to the utmost destruction of the enemy. The idea is to permit no sons, grandsons and greatgrandsons from seeking revenge. You are completely wrong about this, and I can prove it with two words: Germany. Japan. While total genocide is impossible, ninety percent should be acheivable. Enough to cripple the other side for two to three generations. Then the same thing can be done again and again and again. So forgiveness, no forgetting. No. The entire problem with radical Islam can - and likely will - be solved with a few very intense strikes, not even nuclear. What's needed to win a war is that the enemy has to have their will broken. The "wars" in Iraq and Afghan have actually been enormous welfare programs. Had they been real wars, the other nations would have sobered up and the people there would have killed off their own terrorists. And motivated by the Jihad Meme. They are the Jihad Juggernaught. Nonsense. They're just people like anyone else. Their culture is primitive, aggressive, ignorant, and violent, just like...Hey! Just like Germany and Japan a few decades ago. Given a choice between living in secular peace or religious war, they'll give it up sooner or later. The amount of bloodshed will be up to them, but I think you will see a fast rise of reason to the top of the heap. |
#517
|
|||
|
|||
Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
Bob wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:07:56 -0500, "Robert J. Kolker" wrote: How about not saying a word and killing our enemies? If we do that often enough the rest of the world might get the idea. I want the name of our Republic so -feared- that its mere mention will cause people to bleed when they ****. I want to see our Republic become the Dread, the Fear and Boogeyman of civilized life on our planet. Like Rome was in her prime. You ****ed with Rome, in went the Legions, game over. Then one day all these people that the Romans ****ed off with their fascist tactics ganged up and the game was over for Rome. The Ruination of Rome was Christianity and overextension. In their prime the Romans were unbeatable. They made a Desolation and they called it Peace. We might try to do at least as well. We should do to Islam what Rome did to Carthage. Delenda Islama Est! Bob Kolker |
#518
|
|||
|
|||
Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
Bob wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:14:12 -0500, "Robert J. Kolker" wrote: The Court exists as a branch. Congress does not create the Supreme Court. Then it cannot exist as a separate branch. However congress can ordain, with the approval of the executive, additional lower courts. Straw man. I never said anything about any lower courts. Read the Constitution again, this time very carefully. There is an entire article of the Original Seven Articles which defines the Supreme Court in both its original jurisdiction and its appelate jurisdiction, so the Supreme Court is a -creature- of the Constitution, not an act passed by Congress. I want you to cite the exact wording that you claim allows the SC to be a separate branch of govt. I am going to be looking closely for where its autonomous authority is derived. Article III Section 1. The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from ------------------------------------------------------------------------ RIGHT THERE BOB. The Constitution ordains the Supreme Court and Congress establishes the inferior courts. In any case Judges serve for life. They cannot be removed except to blatant misbaviour and moral terpretude. In short, we have an indepdendent judiciary. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office. Section 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects. In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed. Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. Why do I have to the read the U.S. Constitution to you. Can't you read it yourself? Bob Kolker |
#519
|
|||
|
|||
Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
Bob wrote:
The operative words are "the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance of the US Constitution". If laws are unconstitutional, the states are not bound by them. And the court (unfortunately) decides that. Not the states. Nullification is dead and gone, since April of 1865. Your side lost the Civil War. Bob Kolker |
#520
|
|||
|
|||
Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
Bob wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:41:58 -0500, "Robert J. Kolker" wrote: The business of the U.S. should be nation wrecking... It's doing a fine job of that domestically right now. A good peaceful Iraq is a dead Iraq which glows blue at night. There are many people in the world who say the same about Israel. That they do. But the Israelis have nuclear weapons. As the bible says: There is a Bomb in Gilead. Bob Kolker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |