|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
solar observing: opinions sought
I am interested in the coronado binomite binoculars (the original 10x25
version). There was a brief S&T review a couple of years ago, but by now there should be a fair amount of user opinion around. I am told by UK distributors that these binos are quite popular. The attraction for me is convenience and especially the safety factor (for use with school groups etc), and the 12x60 version is too expensive for me. Any comments on the binomite 1? I some white light observing with a solar filter; I like the Baader solar film and prefer the image to that with a rather old thousand oaks filter. I have seen ads for the Baader solar continuum filter, with an 8 nm bandwidth that supposedly brings out more detail in sunspots and granulation. Is this the case? (I observe with a 90 mm refractor). Opinions please! JohnA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Nytecam |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you Mr Nytecam. Yes, I had thought that having to face towards
the sun before putting the binos to the eyes might cause a problem or two. But it is a number of years since I bought any kit, and the binomite 1 is the chance to get something new and quite cheap! I would dearly love a PST (I have seen your regular postings), but I can't personally justify the dosh for it at the moment. Maybe I can persuade the headteacher.... The PST is so remarkable for its price that it seems odd that no other competing product has appeared. Who buys Daystar or Lumicon these days? JohnA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
JohnA wrote:
I would dearly love a PST (I have seen your regular postings), but I can't personally justify the dosh for it at the moment. Maybe I can persuade the headteacher.... The PST is so remarkable for its price that it seems odd that no other competing product has appeared. Who buys Daystar or Lumicon these days? Lots of people do, although for solar work, DayStar would be a better choice for disk work. The DayStar filters tend to allow a larger aperture to be used for a somewhat lower cost than the Coronado filters. For example, I use a DayStar T-Scanner (0.7 angstrom) at about a 90mm aperture which cost around $1800, while a similar 90mm Coronado SolarMax filter would be nearly $5000. As for the PST, it is probably the single most cost effective way to get into observing the sun in H-alpha. I use mine almost every clear day that I can get some time available, and its performance is well worth its rather modest cost of $500. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 12th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 31 - Aug. 5, 2005, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmm...I suppose I really meant: products that compete with the PST,
i.e. budget H-alpha. Here in the UK, the PST retails for the equivalent of $760, alas. JohnA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UCSD Discovery Suggests 'Protosun' Was Shining During Formation Of First Matter In Solar System | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 11th 05 08:32 PM |
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt | hermesnines | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 27th 04 02:14 AM |
Scientists report first-ever 3-D observations of solar storms usingUlysses spacecraft (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 17th 03 01:46 AM |
ESA Sees Stardust Storms Heading For Solar System | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 20th 03 08:10 PM |
What can be expected with solar filters? | Rune Allnor | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | July 17th 03 02:48 PM |