A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

WTF Progressive Collapse??? [OST + EMP = GZ]



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 29th 14, 11:02 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Arc Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,480
Default WTF Progressive Collapse??? [OST + EMP = GZ]

On Monday, December 29, 2014 2:41:41 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:
"Government Shill #2" wrote in message



people laugh as u claim ur troll post ( little to no one else sees) proves that 9/11 was three nukes.


ever contact the authorities, with ur 'post proof?'

  #2  
Old December 29th 14, 11:20 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Rocky[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default WTF Progressive Collapse??? [OST + EMP = GZ]


"Arc Michael" wrote in message
...
On Monday, December 29, 2014 2:41:41 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:
"Government Shill #2" wrote in message



people laugh as u claim ur troll post ( little to no one else sees)
proves that 9/11 was three nukes.


Wow. You are completely worthless AM if you didn't see that the OST was in
Nuke York City and that explains why there was an EMP.

And the timing of the EMP being 12 seconds before the vaporization of the
North Tower tells us the nuke was underground.

And the surviving corners of the Twin Towers prove the Twin Towers were
nuked from underground.

And since everything above is expanded in the post you removed from your
reply I'll put it back in this one:

==========================

Ooooh BS#2 you are too funny because I don't have to dance around anymore
since there is a simple equation that describes the destruction of the WTC.

The equation is OST + EMP = GZ

Where the OST was proven on location by this post:
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 3:37 PM
Subject: Wow proof that the OST was in Nuke York City on 9/11

EMPs were proven to by this post:
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 2:08 PM
Subject: Who said there were no EMPs in Nuke York City on 9/11?

And GZ (Ground Zero) where there was a near total lack of debris from 2x110
story buildings was proven by:a photo of the crime scene:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg


In conclusion the OCT or Official Collapse Theory
has been busted by the simple equation:
OST + EMP = GZ G

Rocky


  #3  
Old December 29th 14, 11:35 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Arc Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,480
Default WTF Progressive Collapse??? [OST + EMP = GZ]

On Monday, December 29, 2014 3:20:17 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:
"Arc Michael" aboo


people laugh as u claim ur troll post ( little to no one else sees)
proves that 9/11 was three nukes.


Wow. You are completely worthless AM if you didn't see that the OST was in
Nuke York City and that explains why there was an EMP.

And the timing of the EMP being 12 seconds before the vaporization of the
North Tower tells us the nuke was underground.

And the surviving corners of the Twin Towers prove the Twin Towers were
nuked from underground.

And since everything above is expanded in the post you removed from your
reply I'll put it back in this one:

==========================

Ooooh BS#2 you are too funny because I don't have to dance around anymore
since there is a simple equation that describes the destruction of the WTC.

The equation is OST + EMP = GZ

Where the OST was proven on location by this post:
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 3:37 PM
Subject: Wow proof that the OST was in Nuke York City on 9/11

EMPs were proven to by this post:
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 2:08 PM
Subject: Who said there were no EMPs in Nuke York City on 9/11?

And GZ (Ground Zero) where there was a near total lack of debris from 2x110
story buildings was proven by:a photo of the crime scene:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg


In conclusion the OCT or Official Collapse Theory
has been busted by the simple equation:
OST + EMP = GZ G

Rocky


a truth is a military exercise is always going on somewhere, if not the USA off the shores of some nation.


The pentagon plane was scrapped, nearly disintegrated on impact. It looks more like a missile, but the surveillance vid capture was very low res.
  #4  
Old December 30th 14, 05:42 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Rocky[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default WTF Progressive Collapse??? [OST + EMP = GZ]


"Arc Michael" wrote in message
...
On Monday, December 29, 2014 3:20:17 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:
"Arc Michael" aboo


people laugh as u claim ur troll post ( little to no one else sees)
proves that 9/11 was three nukes.


Wow. You are completely worthless AM if you didn't see that the OST was
in
Nuke York City and that explains why there was an EMP.

And the timing of the EMP being 12 seconds before the vaporization of the
North Tower tells us the nuke was underground.

And the surviving corners of the Twin Towers prove the Twin Towers were
nuked from underground.

And since everything above is expanded in the post you removed from your
reply I'll put it back in this one:

==========================

Ooooh BS#2 you are too funny because I don't have to dance around anymore
since there is a simple equation that describes the destruction of the
WTC.

The equation is OST + EMP = GZ

Where the OST was proven on location by this post:
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 3:37 PM
Subject: Wow proof that the OST was in Nuke York City on 9/11

EMPs were proven to by this post:
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 2:08 PM
Subject: Who said there were no EMPs in Nuke York City on 9/11?

And GZ (Ground Zero) where there was a near total lack of debris from
2x110
story buildings was proven by:a photo of the crime scene:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg


In conclusion the OCT or Official Collapse Theory
has been busted by the simple equation:
OST + EMP = GZ G

Rocky


a truth is a military exercise is always going on somewhere, if not the
USA off the shores of some nation.


And that means what?

The pentagon plane was scrapped, nearly disintegrated on impact. It
looks more like a missile, but the surveillance vid capture was very low
res.


riiight. And you think there was a real jet at the Pentagon why?

Rocky


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Progressive Political Party Platform kT Policy 15 October 8th 08 05:56 PM
From Progressive Europe: 56% Of French Believe The Sun Revolves Around The Earth Sound of Trumpet[_4_] Astronomy Misc 4 September 23rd 07 02:53 AM
Progressive Mayor Double-A Misc 15 December 15th 06 10:02 AM
progressive precession wahid Misc 5 January 31st 06 04:26 PM
[slightly OT] driving a Sony PAL CCD in progressive way Antonio Pasini CCD Imaging 1 May 2nd 04 05:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.