|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
is the GPS myth unmythbustable?
GPS represents an episode of great triumph for engineers.
Originally, self-styled physicists, whose every second of waking moment is to look for the last drop of the fermented diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar to gulp down, had proposed to decode the GPS signals with only 3 satellites. Since the unknowns in a GPS solution are four --- 3 spatial and 1 temporal, that left only 3 equations to solve for 4 unknowns. shrug Thus, in this situation of acquiring just 3 satellites, the chronological time among the receiver and the 3 satellites must be synchronized. This is where relativistic effect, if indeed exists, would come in. In this situation, the synchronization among the satellites and the ground/receiver chronological time counters becomes critical. However, relativistic correction remains a very minor anomaly. The atmospheric disturbances and others are bigger concerns when synchronizing the satellites and the receiver chronological time counters. It is better to delegate this as a software solution to periodically advance or slow the chronological time count of the receiver. shrug Very soon, engineers, being a lot smarter due to the fact that they must provide actual hardware instead of bull**** vaporware, realized with 4 unknowns, 4 satellites must be acquired to yield 4 independent equations to solve for these 4 unknowns. This is indeed a very basic mathematical concept. shrug As long as the chronological time counters of the satellites are synchronized, there is no need to synchronize the ground chronological time with these satellites, and thus the relativistic correction, whether it exists or not, does not come into play anymore since all GPS satellites orbit at the same altitude with the same GR anomaly. shrug Well, the self-styled physicists with **** for their brains cannot comprehend this simple mathematical method. They are still promoting their myth and garbage. Self-styled physicists are not scientists but just idiots. shrug |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
is the GPS myth unmythbustable?
On Aug 18, 3:34*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
GPS represents an episode of great triumph for engineers. Originally, self-styled physicists, whose every second of waking moment is to look for the last drop of the fermented diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar to gulp down, had proposed to decode the GPS signals with only 3 satellites. *Since the unknowns in a GPS solution are four --- 3 spatial and 1 temporal, that left only 3 equations to solve for 4 unknowns. *shrug Since it's going to take the goons that work in Physics another 100 years to discover that mathematicians, rather than physicists or engineers invented GPS it makes little difference. Since actual engineers have never used if for anything other than modern missle technology. Thus, in this situation of acquiring just 3 satellites, the chronological time among the receiver and the 3 satellites must be synchronized. *This is where relativistic effect, if indeed exists, would come in. *In this situation, the synchronization among the satellites and the ground/receiver chronological time counters becomes critical. *However, relativistic correction remains a very minor anomaly. *The atmospheric disturbances and others are bigger concerns when synchronizing the satellites and the receiver chronological time counters. *It is better to delegate this as a software solution to periodically advance or slow the chronological time count of the receiver. *shrug Very soon, engineers, being a lot smarter due to the fact that they must provide actual hardware instead of bull**** vaporware, realized with 4 unknowns, 4 satellites must be acquired to yield 4 independent equations to solve for these 4 unknowns. *This is indeed a very basic mathematical concept. *shrug As long as the chronological time counters of the satellites are synchronized, there is no need to synchronize the ground chronological time with these satellites, and thus the relativistic correction, whether it exists or not, does not come into play anymore since all GPS satellites orbit at the same altitude with the same GR anomaly. shrug Well, the self-styled physicists with **** for their brains cannot comprehend this simple mathematical method. *They are still promoting their myth and garbage. *Self-styled physicists are not scientists but just idiots. *shrug |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
is the GPS myth unmythbustable?
"Poutnik" wrote in message ... | In article 19743bed-f6b9-497e-89ac- | , | says... | | | Thus, in this situation of acquiring just 3 satellites, the | chronological time among the receiver and the 3 satellites must be | synchronized. This is where relativistic effect, if indeed exists, | would come in. In this situation, the synchronization among the | satellites and the ground/receiver chronological time counters becomes | critical. However, relativistic correction remains a very minor | anomaly. The atmospheric disturbances and others are bigger concerns | when synchronizing the satellites and the receiver chronological time | counters. It is better to delegate this as a software solution to | periodically advance or slow the chronological time count of the | receiver. shrug | | Receiver distance to satellite is calculated from difference | of received timestamps and receiver time synced to satellite clock. | | The relativistic time error 38 us/day | is causing cumulative distance error 120 m /15 minutes, | as shown in other thread. | | But receiver accepts this errorneous time as its own by sychronization. | Then satellite distance calculated as | L = c . [(receiver clock + rel. error) I didn't know my cell phone had an atomic clock... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
is the GPS myth unmythbustable?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
is the GPS myth unmythbustable?
"Androcles" wrote: in message ... "Poutnik" wrote in message ... | In article 19743bed-f6b9-497e-89ac- | , | says... | | | Thus, in this situation of acquiring just 3 satellites, the | chronological time among the receiver and the 3 satellites must be | synchronized. This is where relativistic effect, if indeed exists, | would come in. In this situation, the synchronization among the | satellites and the ground/receiver chronological time counters becomes | critical. However, relativistic correction remains a very minor | anomaly. The atmospheric disturbances and others are bigger concerns | when synchronizing the satellites and the receiver chronological time | counters. It is better to delegate this as a software solution to | periodically advance or slow the chronological time count of the | receiver. shrug | | Receiver distance to satellite is calculated from difference | of received timestamps and receiver time synced to satellite clock. | | The relativistic time error 38 us/day | is causing cumulative distance error 120 m /15 minutes, | as shown in other thread. | | But receiver accepts this errorneous time as its own by sychronization. | Then satellite distance calculated as | L = c . [(receiver clock + rel. error) Androcles wrote: Snipped Androcles' (useless/stupid/wrong/insulting) crap which he only posts to boast & toot and brag about his, http://tinyurl.com/Andro-John-Parkers-Girl-friend whom he pokes & prods, ever since he introduced her on April 12th, after he proudly posted his mantra to brag about his http://tinyurl.com/Andros-sad-and-sorry-life wherein | == JP said: I like to be crass and offend in retribution for | == JP said: a career of arse-kissing politeness in pursuit | == JP said: of the almighty buck, & where better than usenet?] (The domestication of John Parker will continue... ahahaha) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
is the GPS myth unmythbustable?
"Poutnik" wrote in message ... | In article , | | | | | | Receiver distance to satellite is calculated from difference | | of received timestamps and receiver time synced to satellite clock. | | | | The relativistic time error 38 us/day | | is causing cumulative distance error 120 m /15 minutes, | | as shown in other thread. | | | | But receiver accepts this errorneous time as its own by sychronization. | | Then satellite distance calculated as | | L = c . [(receiver clock + rel. error) | | I didn't know my cell phone had an atomic clock... | | Sure it does not, just a quartz clock. | By receiver clock I meant receiver clock time, sorry for confusion. I didn't know my cell phone had cell phone time. I'm sure my cell phone has British Summer Time (BST), which is exactly 1 hour ahead of Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), which in turn is 15 seconds ahead of Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) that GPS satellites use because leap-seconds have been added since the first GPS satellite was launched and nobody has visited them to correct them. They are coordinated, which relativistic imbeciles are not. No two relativistic imbeciles can agree on the same bull****. Now I'll tell you something. My cell phone doesn't use cell phone time, cell phone clock time, receiver time or receiver clock time to give its location. If you knew anything at all about solving four simultaneous equations in four variables you wouldn't need to bull**** my cell phone, it does know. Are you trying to confuse my cell phone? It is only a little bit confused, it says it's on the other side of the road because the satellite signal reflects from buildings, not out near the orbit of Saturn one light-hour and 20 light-minutes away. Say sorry to my cell phone, it knows what it is doing and is smarter than you. If you try to confuse my cell phone again it might think you are a ****ing idiot. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
is the GPS myth unmythbustable?
"Androcles" wrote in message ... "Poutnik" wrote in message ... | In article , | | | | | | Receiver distance to satellite is calculated from difference | | of received timestamps and receiver time synced to satellite clock. | | | | The relativistic time error 38 us/day | | is causing cumulative distance error 120 m /15 minutes, | | as shown in other thread. | | | | But receiver accepts this errorneous time as its own by sychronization. | | Then satellite distance calculated as | | L = c . [(receiver clock + rel. error) | Andcorcles wrote: | I didn't know my cell phone had an atomic clock... | Pouter wrote: | Sure it does not, just a quartz clock. | By receiver clock I meant receiver clock time, sorry for confusion. Andcorcles wrote: I didn't know my cell phone had cell phone time. If you try to confuse my cell phone again it might think you, Poutnick, are a ****ing idiot. hanson wrote: ahahahaha... Andro is factually right, but Andro's useless, stupid & insulting crap was Snipped since it reflects only Analdorcles' need to boast and toot and brag about his, http://tinyurl.com/Andro-John-Parkers-Girl-friend whom he pokes & prods, ever since he introduced her on April 12th, after he proudly posted his mantra to brag about his http://tinyurl.com/Andros-sad-and-sorry-life wherein | == JP said: I like to be crass and offend in retribution for | == JP said: a career of arse-kissing politeness in pursuit | == JP said: of the almighty buck, & where better than usenet?] ahahahahaha... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
is the GPS myth unmythbustable?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
is the GPS myth unmythbustable?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dynamicist myth | oriel36 | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 6th 06 08:03 PM |
Another dynamicist myth | oriel36 | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 6th 06 02:44 PM |
Another MYTH destroyed | DistortionDestructionTeam | Misc | 51 | November 4th 04 07:36 PM |
Space is just a myth ! | Brian Raab | Astronomy Misc | 3 | October 3rd 04 07:47 PM |