A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

EINSTEINIANA: ETHICAL PRINCIPLES



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 25th 08, 08:31 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default EINSTEINIANA: ETHICAL PRINCIPLES

http://pirsa.org/08090035/
Ethical Einsteinian Lee Smolin: "I develop the idea that science works
because scientists form communities defined by a set of ethical
principles which, even if imperfectly applied, tend to lead to
progress in our understanding of nature."

The application of Einsteiniana's ethical principles as presented a
decade ago by dying Bryan Wallace:

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/FP_C4_PP.HTM
Bryan Wallace: "I would like to make several quotes from a book on
this problem by Ruggero M. Santilli who is the director of The
Institute for Basic Research:

This book is, in essence, a report on the rather extreme hostility I
have encountered in U.S. academic circles in the conduction,
organization and promotion of quantitative, theoretical, mathematical,
and experimental studies on the apparent insufficiencies of Einstein's
ideas in face of an ever growing scientific knowledge. [23 p.7]

In 1977, I was visiting the Department of Physics at Harvard
University for the purpose of studying precisely non- Galilean
systems. My task was to attempt the generalization of the analytic,
algebraic and geometric methods of the Galilean systems into forms
suitable for the non-Galilean ones.

The studies began under the best possible auspices. In fact, I had a
(signed) contract with one of the world's leading editorial houses in
physics, Springer-Verlag of Heidelberg West Germany, to write a series
of monographs in the field that were later published in ref.s [24] and
[25]. Furthermore, I was the recipient of a research contract with the
U.S. Department of Energy, contract number ER-78-S-02- 4720.A000, for
the conduction of these studies.

Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow, Steven Weinberg, and other senior
physicists at Harvard opposed my studies to such a point of preventing
my drawing a salary from my own grant for almost one academic year.

This prohibition to draw my salary from my grant was perpetrated with
full awareness of the fact that it would have created hardship on my
children and on my family. In fact, I had communicated to them (in
writing) that I had no other income, and that I had two children in
tender age and my wife (then a graduate student in social work) to
feed and shelter. After almost one academic year of delaying my salary
authorization, when the case was just about to explode in law suits, I
finally received authorization to draw my salary from my own grant as
a member of the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University.

But, Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow and Steven Weinberg and possibly
others had declared to the Department of Mathematics that my studies
"had no physical value." This created predictable problems in the
mathematics department which lead to the subsequent, apparently
intended, impossibility of continuing my research at Harvard.

Even after my leaving Harvard, their claim of "no physical value" of
my studies persisted, affected a number of other scientists, and
finally rendered unavoidable the writing of IL GRANDE GRIDO.*

* S. Glashow and S. Weinberg obtained the Nobel Prize in physics in
1979 on theories, the so-called unified gauge theories, that are
crucially dependent on Einstein's special relativity; subsequently, S.
Weinberg left Harvard for The University of Texas at Austin, while S.
Coleman and S. Glashow are still members of Harvard University to this
writing. [23 p.29]"
________________________
[end of Bryan Wallace's text]

Pentcho Valev

  #2  
Old September 25th 08, 06:03 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,sci.astro
cosmic yogi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default EINSTEINIANA: ETHICAL PRINCIPLES

On Sep 25, 12:31*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://pirsa.org/08090035/
Ethical Einsteinian Lee Smolin: "I develop the idea that science works
because scientists form communities defined by a set of ethical
principles which, even if imperfectly applied, tend to lead to
progress in our understanding of nature."

The application of Einsteiniana's ethical principles as presented a
decade ago by dying Bryan Wallace:

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/FP_C4_PP.HTM
Bryan Wallace: "I would like to make several quotes from a book on
this problem by Ruggero M. Santilli who is the director of The
Institute for Basic Research:

This book is, in essence, a report on the rather extreme hostility I
have encountered in U.S. academic circles in the conduction,
organization and promotion of quantitative, theoretical, mathematical,
and experimental studies on the apparent insufficiencies of Einstein's
ideas in face of an ever growing scientific knowledge. [23 p.7]

In 1977, I was visiting the Department of Physics at Harvard
University for the purpose of studying precisely non- Galilean
systems. My task was to attempt the generalization of the analytic,
algebraic and geometric methods of the Galilean systems into forms
suitable for the non-Galilean ones.

The studies began under the best possible auspices. In fact, I had a
(signed) contract with one of the world's leading editorial houses in
physics, Springer-Verlag of Heidelberg West Germany, to write a series
of monographs in the field that were later published in ref.s [24] and
[25]. Furthermore, I was the recipient of a research contract with the
U.S. Department of Energy, contract number ER-78-S-02- 4720.A000, for
the conduction of these studies.

Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow, Steven Weinberg, and other senior
physicists at Harvard opposed my studies to such a point of preventing
my drawing a salary from my own grant for almost one academic year.

This prohibition to draw my salary from my grant was perpetrated with
full awareness of the fact that it would have created hardship on my
children and on my family. In fact, I had communicated to them (in
writing) that I had no other income, and that I had two children in
tender age and my wife (then a graduate student in social work) to
feed and shelter. After almost one academic year of delaying my salary
authorization, when the case was just about to explode in law suits, I
finally received authorization to draw my salary from my own grant as
a member of the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University.

But, Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow and Steven Weinberg and possibly
others had declared to the Department of Mathematics that my studies
"had no physical value." This created predictable problems in the
mathematics department which lead to the subsequent, apparently
intended, impossibility of continuing my research at Harvard.

Even after my leaving Harvard, their claim of "no physical value" of
my studies persisted, affected a number of other scientists, and
finally rendered unavoidable the writing of IL GRANDE GRIDO.*

* S. Glashow and S. Weinberg obtained the Nobel Prize in physics in
1979 on theories, the so-called unified gauge theories, that are
crucially dependent on Einstein's special relativity; subsequently, S.
Weinberg left Harvard for The University of Texas at Austin, while S.
Coleman and S. Glashow are still members of Harvard University to this
writing. [23 p.29]"
________________________
[end of Bryan Wallace's text]

Pentcho Valev


SUB: HOW SCIENCE CAN ADVANCE ?
By Vidyardhi Nanduri
One of the distinct features of Research is the Expansion of Knowledge
in various domains that help growth of many inter-disciplinary areas
and applications. Every Technology advancement is backed-up from Key
discoveries
Intellectual advancement and Invention Promotion goes hand-in -hand.
one sees many western countries progress through Integration of
Knowledge Base from Leading Scientific Institutions extend the
Frontiers in Space-Cosmology Research and Laser-Atomic Research to
Planck scale.
This lead helps the Scientific Community to next dimension of
Knowledge-Laser distance scales up to 10^16 Light Years
Best of the Brains are needed in many of these Frontier areas

NECESSITY-DEMAND-CURIOSITY -SUSTANANCE - is the Base Infra-Structure
for
Intellectual Interface. On my own, I will be interested in Cosmology
Vedas Interlinks that span many fields. In search of ORIGINS, some of
my findings question present day theories. The Centre of the Universe
is projected by me at 100,000 Light years from the Milky Way.
Search for More EINSTEINS means Look beyond SUN-PLANETARY REGION
SEARCH BEYOND BLACK-HOLE means LOOK TOWARDS
INTER-GALACTIC REGION
SEARCH BEYOND DARK MATTER means LEAD KINDLY LIGHT - TAMSOMA
JYOTHIRGAMYAM
(Part of Text prepared last week for- Nobel Laureate- Dialogue,India,
Hyderabad)
ONCENTRATION, MEDITATION AND DEDICATION ARE THE KEYS FOR PROGRESS
INDEX- CV news by VN

PROTECT COPY RIGHTS AND PROJECT COSMOLOGY- VEDAS INTERLINKS AS PRIDE -
INDIA
All Books - CONTACT AUTHOR-
http://www.ebookomatic.com/publish/A...ry.asp?Aid=241
COSMOLOGY VEDAS-Interlinks-FREE DOWNLOAD :
http://www.buymyebook.com/buy/author...p?EbookId=1422



  #3  
Old September 26th 08, 11:01 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,sci.astro
ouarza
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default EINSTEINIANA: ETHICAL PRINCIPLES

Pentcho Valev a écrit :
http://pirsa.org/08090035/
Ethical Einsteinian Lee Smolin: "I develop the idea that science works
because scientists form communities defined by a set of ethical
principles which, even if imperfectly applied, tend to lead to
progress in our understanding of nature."

The application of Einsteiniana's ethical principles as presented a
decade ago by dying Bryan Wallace:

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/FP_C4_PP.HTM
Bryan Wallace: "I would like to make several quotes from a book on
this problem by Ruggero M. Santilli who is the director of The
Institute for Basic Research:

This book is, in essence, a report on the rather extreme hostility I
have encountered in U.S. academic circles in the conduction,
organization and promotion of quantitative, theoretical, mathematical,
and experimental studies on the apparent insufficiencies of Einstein's
ideas in face of an ever growing scientific knowledge. [23 p.7]

In 1977, I was visiting the Department of Physics at Harvard
University for the purpose of studying precisely non- Galilean
systems. My task was to attempt the generalization of the analytic,
algebraic and geometric methods of the Galilean systems into forms
suitable for the non-Galilean ones.

The studies began under the best possible auspices. In fact, I had a
(signed) contract with one of the world's leading editorial houses in
physics, Springer-Verlag of Heidelberg West Germany, to write a series
of monographs in the field that were later published in ref.s [24] and
[25]. Furthermore, I was the recipient of a research contract with the
U.S. Department of Energy, contract number ER-78-S-02- 4720.A000, for
the conduction of these studies.

Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow, Steven Weinberg, and other senior
physicists at Harvard opposed my studies to such a point of preventing
my drawing a salary from my own grant for almost one academic year.

This prohibition to draw my salary from my grant was perpetrated with
full awareness of the fact that it would have created hardship on my
children and on my family. In fact, I had communicated to them (in
writing) that I had no other income, and that I had two children in
tender age and my wife (then a graduate student in social work) to
feed and shelter. After almost one academic year of delaying my salary
authorization, when the case was just about to explode in law suits, I
finally received authorization to draw my salary from my own grant as
a member of the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University.

But, Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow and Steven Weinberg and possibly
others had declared to the Department of Mathematics that my studies
"had no physical value." This created predictable problems in the
mathematics department which lead to the subsequent, apparently
intended, impossibility of continuing my research at Harvard.

Even after my leaving Harvard, their claim of "no physical value" of
my studies persisted, affected a number of other scientists, and
finally rendered unavoidable the writing of IL GRANDE GRIDO.*

* S. Glashow and S. Weinberg obtained the Nobel Prize in physics in
1979 on theories, the so-called unified gauge theories, that are
crucially dependent on Einstein's special relativity; subsequently, S.
Weinberg left Harvard for The University of Texas at Austin, while S.
Coleman and S. Glashow are still members of Harvard University to this
writing. [23 p.29]"
________________________
[end of Bryan Wallace's text]

Pentcho Valev

je plonge des peuples entiers dans des torpeurs ethérées infernales,
dissipant leur bien-être, amenant sécheresse et ennui, craquant
vertebres, broyant viscères, liquéfiant matières encéphaliques
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fabric contrary to ethical shame [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 0 August 19th 07 01:09 AM
Astronomical working principles oriel36 UK Astronomy 3 February 13th 06 11:30 AM
The core principles oriel36 UK Astronomy 0 December 28th 05 01:06 PM
One Find, Two Astronomers: An Ethical Brawl Hilton Evans Amateur Astronomy 0 September 13th 05 12:48 PM
Proper principles. [email protected] UK Astronomy 1 March 6th 05 03:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.