|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEINIANA: ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
http://pirsa.org/08090035/
Ethical Einsteinian Lee Smolin: "I develop the idea that science works because scientists form communities defined by a set of ethical principles which, even if imperfectly applied, tend to lead to progress in our understanding of nature." The application of Einsteiniana's ethical principles as presented a decade ago by dying Bryan Wallace: http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/FP_C4_PP.HTM Bryan Wallace: "I would like to make several quotes from a book on this problem by Ruggero M. Santilli who is the director of The Institute for Basic Research: This book is, in essence, a report on the rather extreme hostility I have encountered in U.S. academic circles in the conduction, organization and promotion of quantitative, theoretical, mathematical, and experimental studies on the apparent insufficiencies of Einstein's ideas in face of an ever growing scientific knowledge. [23 p.7] In 1977, I was visiting the Department of Physics at Harvard University for the purpose of studying precisely non- Galilean systems. My task was to attempt the generalization of the analytic, algebraic and geometric methods of the Galilean systems into forms suitable for the non-Galilean ones. The studies began under the best possible auspices. In fact, I had a (signed) contract with one of the world's leading editorial houses in physics, Springer-Verlag of Heidelberg West Germany, to write a series of monographs in the field that were later published in ref.s [24] and [25]. Furthermore, I was the recipient of a research contract with the U.S. Department of Energy, contract number ER-78-S-02- 4720.A000, for the conduction of these studies. Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow, Steven Weinberg, and other senior physicists at Harvard opposed my studies to such a point of preventing my drawing a salary from my own grant for almost one academic year. This prohibition to draw my salary from my grant was perpetrated with full awareness of the fact that it would have created hardship on my children and on my family. In fact, I had communicated to them (in writing) that I had no other income, and that I had two children in tender age and my wife (then a graduate student in social work) to feed and shelter. After almost one academic year of delaying my salary authorization, when the case was just about to explode in law suits, I finally received authorization to draw my salary from my own grant as a member of the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University. But, Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow and Steven Weinberg and possibly others had declared to the Department of Mathematics that my studies "had no physical value." This created predictable problems in the mathematics department which lead to the subsequent, apparently intended, impossibility of continuing my research at Harvard. Even after my leaving Harvard, their claim of "no physical value" of my studies persisted, affected a number of other scientists, and finally rendered unavoidable the writing of IL GRANDE GRIDO.* * S. Glashow and S. Weinberg obtained the Nobel Prize in physics in 1979 on theories, the so-called unified gauge theories, that are crucially dependent on Einstein's special relativity; subsequently, S. Weinberg left Harvard for The University of Texas at Austin, while S. Coleman and S. Glashow are still members of Harvard University to this writing. [23 p.29]" ________________________ [end of Bryan Wallace's text] Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEINIANA: ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
On Sep 25, 12:31*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://pirsa.org/08090035/ Ethical Einsteinian Lee Smolin: "I develop the idea that science works because scientists form communities defined by a set of ethical principles which, even if imperfectly applied, tend to lead to progress in our understanding of nature." The application of Einsteiniana's ethical principles as presented a decade ago by dying Bryan Wallace: http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/FP_C4_PP.HTM Bryan Wallace: "I would like to make several quotes from a book on this problem by Ruggero M. Santilli who is the director of The Institute for Basic Research: This book is, in essence, a report on the rather extreme hostility I have encountered in U.S. academic circles in the conduction, organization and promotion of quantitative, theoretical, mathematical, and experimental studies on the apparent insufficiencies of Einstein's ideas in face of an ever growing scientific knowledge. [23 p.7] In 1977, I was visiting the Department of Physics at Harvard University for the purpose of studying precisely non- Galilean systems. My task was to attempt the generalization of the analytic, algebraic and geometric methods of the Galilean systems into forms suitable for the non-Galilean ones. The studies began under the best possible auspices. In fact, I had a (signed) contract with one of the world's leading editorial houses in physics, Springer-Verlag of Heidelberg West Germany, to write a series of monographs in the field that were later published in ref.s [24] and [25]. Furthermore, I was the recipient of a research contract with the U.S. Department of Energy, contract number ER-78-S-02- 4720.A000, for the conduction of these studies. Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow, Steven Weinberg, and other senior physicists at Harvard opposed my studies to such a point of preventing my drawing a salary from my own grant for almost one academic year. This prohibition to draw my salary from my grant was perpetrated with full awareness of the fact that it would have created hardship on my children and on my family. In fact, I had communicated to them (in writing) that I had no other income, and that I had two children in tender age and my wife (then a graduate student in social work) to feed and shelter. After almost one academic year of delaying my salary authorization, when the case was just about to explode in law suits, I finally received authorization to draw my salary from my own grant as a member of the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University. But, Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow and Steven Weinberg and possibly others had declared to the Department of Mathematics that my studies "had no physical value." This created predictable problems in the mathematics department which lead to the subsequent, apparently intended, impossibility of continuing my research at Harvard. Even after my leaving Harvard, their claim of "no physical value" of my studies persisted, affected a number of other scientists, and finally rendered unavoidable the writing of IL GRANDE GRIDO.* * S. Glashow and S. Weinberg obtained the Nobel Prize in physics in 1979 on theories, the so-called unified gauge theories, that are crucially dependent on Einstein's special relativity; subsequently, S. Weinberg left Harvard for The University of Texas at Austin, while S. Coleman and S. Glashow are still members of Harvard University to this writing. [23 p.29]" ________________________ [end of Bryan Wallace's text] Pentcho Valev SUB: HOW SCIENCE CAN ADVANCE ? By Vidyardhi Nanduri One of the distinct features of Research is the Expansion of Knowledge in various domains that help growth of many inter-disciplinary areas and applications. Every Technology advancement is backed-up from Key discoveries Intellectual advancement and Invention Promotion goes hand-in -hand. one sees many western countries progress through Integration of Knowledge Base from Leading Scientific Institutions extend the Frontiers in Space-Cosmology Research and Laser-Atomic Research to Planck scale. This lead helps the Scientific Community to next dimension of Knowledge-Laser distance scales up to 10^16 Light Years Best of the Brains are needed in many of these Frontier areas NECESSITY-DEMAND-CURIOSITY -SUSTANANCE - is the Base Infra-Structure for Intellectual Interface. On my own, I will be interested in Cosmology Vedas Interlinks that span many fields. In search of ORIGINS, some of my findings question present day theories. The Centre of the Universe is projected by me at 100,000 Light years from the Milky Way. Search for More EINSTEINS means Look beyond SUN-PLANETARY REGION SEARCH BEYOND BLACK-HOLE means LOOK TOWARDS INTER-GALACTIC REGION SEARCH BEYOND DARK MATTER means LEAD KINDLY LIGHT - TAMSOMA JYOTHIRGAMYAM (Part of Text prepared last week for- Nobel Laureate- Dialogue,India, Hyderabad) ONCENTRATION, MEDITATION AND DEDICATION ARE THE KEYS FOR PROGRESS INDEX- CV news by VN PROTECT COPY RIGHTS AND PROJECT COSMOLOGY- VEDAS INTERLINKS AS PRIDE - INDIA All Books - CONTACT AUTHOR- http://www.ebookomatic.com/publish/A...ry.asp?Aid=241 COSMOLOGY VEDAS-Interlinks-FREE DOWNLOAD : http://www.buymyebook.com/buy/author...p?EbookId=1422 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEINIANA: ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
Pentcho Valev a écrit :
http://pirsa.org/08090035/ Ethical Einsteinian Lee Smolin: "I develop the idea that science works because scientists form communities defined by a set of ethical principles which, even if imperfectly applied, tend to lead to progress in our understanding of nature." The application of Einsteiniana's ethical principles as presented a decade ago by dying Bryan Wallace: http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/FP_C4_PP.HTM Bryan Wallace: "I would like to make several quotes from a book on this problem by Ruggero M. Santilli who is the director of The Institute for Basic Research: This book is, in essence, a report on the rather extreme hostility I have encountered in U.S. academic circles in the conduction, organization and promotion of quantitative, theoretical, mathematical, and experimental studies on the apparent insufficiencies of Einstein's ideas in face of an ever growing scientific knowledge. [23 p.7] In 1977, I was visiting the Department of Physics at Harvard University for the purpose of studying precisely non- Galilean systems. My task was to attempt the generalization of the analytic, algebraic and geometric methods of the Galilean systems into forms suitable for the non-Galilean ones. The studies began under the best possible auspices. In fact, I had a (signed) contract with one of the world's leading editorial houses in physics, Springer-Verlag of Heidelberg West Germany, to write a series of monographs in the field that were later published in ref.s [24] and [25]. Furthermore, I was the recipient of a research contract with the U.S. Department of Energy, contract number ER-78-S-02- 4720.A000, for the conduction of these studies. Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow, Steven Weinberg, and other senior physicists at Harvard opposed my studies to such a point of preventing my drawing a salary from my own grant for almost one academic year. This prohibition to draw my salary from my grant was perpetrated with full awareness of the fact that it would have created hardship on my children and on my family. In fact, I had communicated to them (in writing) that I had no other income, and that I had two children in tender age and my wife (then a graduate student in social work) to feed and shelter. After almost one academic year of delaying my salary authorization, when the case was just about to explode in law suits, I finally received authorization to draw my salary from my own grant as a member of the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University. But, Sidney Coleman, Shelly Glashow and Steven Weinberg and possibly others had declared to the Department of Mathematics that my studies "had no physical value." This created predictable problems in the mathematics department which lead to the subsequent, apparently intended, impossibility of continuing my research at Harvard. Even after my leaving Harvard, their claim of "no physical value" of my studies persisted, affected a number of other scientists, and finally rendered unavoidable the writing of IL GRANDE GRIDO.* * S. Glashow and S. Weinberg obtained the Nobel Prize in physics in 1979 on theories, the so-called unified gauge theories, that are crucially dependent on Einstein's special relativity; subsequently, S. Weinberg left Harvard for The University of Texas at Austin, while S. Coleman and S. Glashow are still members of Harvard University to this writing. [23 p.29]" ________________________ [end of Bryan Wallace's text] Pentcho Valev je plonge des peuples entiers dans des torpeurs ethérées infernales, dissipant leur bien-être, amenant sécheresse et ennui, craquant vertebres, broyant viscères, liquéfiant matières encéphaliques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fabric contrary to ethical shame | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 19th 07 01:09 AM |
Astronomical working principles | oriel36 | UK Astronomy | 3 | February 13th 06 11:30 AM |
The core principles | oriel36 | UK Astronomy | 0 | December 28th 05 01:06 PM |
One Find, Two Astronomers: An Ethical Brawl | Hilton Evans | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 13th 05 12:48 PM |
Proper principles. | [email protected] | UK Astronomy | 1 | March 6th 05 03:36 PM |