Gamma demystified

On Aug 24, 9:47 pm, shuba wrote:

Beginners are often fascinated and mystified by this gamma which is
presented as 1/sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2) and seems to have some fundamental
importance in special relativity.

Only self-styled physicists are mystified by the so-called gamma
term. shrug

Proper time, being an invariant, is the fundamental concept, and
gamma is simply the rate of change of coordinate time with respect
to proper time.

Proper time was introduced later on after Minkowski combined the 4
equations of the Lorentz transform into a single equation which He
(not Minkowski) shall call it the spacetime equation. shrug

Writing all four equations of the Lorentz transform into a single one,
we have

** c^2 dt1^2 – ds1^2 = c^2 dt2^2 – ds2^2, spacetime equation

Where

** ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2

On a side note, the Lorentz transform satisfies the principle of
relativity, but Larmor’s transform does not. These two transforms are
almost identical except that Larmor’s transform must have this gamma
factor in each observer’s absolute speed while the Lorentz transform
has it in the relative speed of the two observers. Larmor’s transform
is one of the infinite numbers of mathematical models that satisfies
the null results of the MMX, but the Lorentz transform was derived out
of Larmor’s transform through a mathematical mistake originated by
Poincare. The Lorentz transform is only valid if the two observers of
Larmor’s transform are moving in parallel relative to the absolute
frame of reference. Thus, in general, the Lorentz transform does not
satisfy the null result of the MMX. Anyhow, both can be written into
the same equation above. With two such exactly opposite mathematical
models able to be written into the same equation, alarm bell should be
ringing loudly, but the self-styled physicists in the past 100 years
have never been intelligent enough to realize the problem, and that is
where the mathemaGics can ‘cross over to and haunt the other side’.
shrug

Back to the spacetime equation, it can relate to multiple observers
not limited to just two.

** c^2 dt1^2 – ds1^2 = c^2 dt2^2 – ds2^2 = c^2 dt3^2 – ds3^2

One of the observers can now be the observed. Notice the displacement
becomes null when the observed is observing itself.

** c^2 dTau^2 = c^2 dt^2 – ds^2

Where

** Tau = time flow of the observed, LOCAL time only

Tau can only be the time flow of the observed, the local time of the
observed, and nothing else. It is just as simple as that. However,
the self-styled physicists are still clueless about this. They have
invented this proper time stuff to mystify what Tau actually
represents and proliferate the religion of SR which was born out of a
mathematical mistake. shrug

Start with the defintion of infinitesimal proper time,
setting c=1.

(dTau)^2 = (dt)^2 - (dx)^2

Divide through by (dTau^2) and use the chain rule.

1 = (dt/dTau)^2 - [dx/dt * dt/dTau]^2

Use the definitions gamma = dt/dTau and v = dx/dt.

1 = gamma^2 * (1 - v^2)

Solve for gamma.

gamma = 1/sqrt(1 - v^2)

Start with the answer. The derivation of the gamma becomes ever so
circular, handwaving, and ridiculous. Notice you have no account to
why dy and dz terms do not have any gamma corrections. shrug

it's just a simple phase-space,
completely amenable to treatment by quaternions,
that is to say, ordinary "vector mechanics."

Proper time was introduced later on after Minkowski combined the 4
equations of the Lorentz transform into a single equation which Me
(and Beauxeaux Synonymous) shall call it the spacetime equation.
ah frug it.

On Aug 27, 5:52*am, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote:
it's just a simple phase-space,
completely amenable to treatment by quaternions,
that is to say, ordinary "vector mechanics."







Proper time was introduced later on after Minkowski combined the 4
equations of the Lorentz transform into a single equation which Me
(and Beauxeaux Synonymous) shall call it the spacetime equation.
ah frug it.

---------------------
now you overlook another important aspect of it:

while v=c
THE GAMMA IS UNDEFINED MATHEMATICALLY
so noone can tell you what happens while
v=c !!! just as he wishes it to be
for instance the idiotic claime
that photon mass must be zero
to satisfy that unknown mathematical situation
ie ''the photon mass is zero '''

TH E PHOTON MASS IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE 'RULE' THAT
NO MASS CAN REACH c
it is about
exp -90 Kilograms of the only mass that can be
indeed fantastically small yet noth theoretically
zero !!
and it makes a big difference to modern science !!

**BILLIONS HAS BENN WASTED **
ON THAT
IDIOTIC ASSERTION !!!

old copyright of
Yehiel .Porat
------------------------

nonsense; it's just waves in the atoms of "free space,"
which includes the atmosphere when no-oneis looking.

TH E *PHOTON MASS IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE 'RULE' *THAT
NO MASS CAN REACH c
it is about
exp -90 Kilograms *of the only mass that can be
indeed fantastically small yet noth theoretically
zero !!

On Aug 28, 3:33*am, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote:
nonsense; it's just waves in the atoms of "free space,"
which includes the atmosphere when no-oneis looking.







TH E *PHOTON MASS IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE 'RULE' *THAT
NO MASS CAN REACH c
it is about
exp -90 Kilograms *of the only mass that can be
indeed fantastically small yet noth theoretically
zero !!

--------------------
****en pig**** gangster

what is your real name pig****
every one can realize immediately
that you are a hired psycho creep

subhuman psychopath
tell your gangster bosses that
you are even not worth the money they invest of a
creep like you

NEXT !!

Y.Porat
-------------------------------