A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The fundamental flaw of GR



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 22nd 11, 06:30 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Koobee Wublee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default The fundamental flaw of GR

On Aug 19, 2:51 pm, eric gisse wrote:
Aetherist


However, a 'Black Hole' is not a flaw in GR it's a flaw in
taking the mathematical model beyond it domain of applicability.
This is why it's technically called 'a singularity'...


Modernist have come to beleive that its OK to accept
singularities in the math. Just look at the process
of renormalization.


That's the problem with being an uneducated amateur. You get to write
**** like that without the burden of knowing what the **** you are
talking about.


As a college drop-out, you think you know everything. shrug

Black holes are manifestations of a few solutions to the field
equations where the field equations are basically what GR is all
about. There are other solutions that support Newtonian law of
gravity at weak curvature in spacetime. shrug

Take this calculus case for example, f(x) = sin(x) / x


You are such an idiot. The above function has no singularity at (x =
0). It is a really, really bad and stupid example. It reflects your
sorrowful status today as a decade old super senior at the University
of Alaska in Fairbanks. shrug

Or how about the entirity of residue theory from complex analysis? That
requires knowledge of the various _types_ of singularities, and allows
you to calculate various integrals.


This does not even remotely apply to black holes. You are such an
idiot. Stay as a college dropout. shrug

What about classical electromagnetic theory, which you have such a
****ing hardon for?


Classical electromagnetism results in the computer that you posted
that ignorant post. It is good to stay despite you throwing a fit.
shrug

Calculate the self-energy of an electron.


What does that mean?

You get a divergent answer.


It does not apply in this discussion. shrug

What about the field strength of a charge as r -- 0?
Same song, different verse.


Still does not apply to the discussion. shrug

Hint: GR has nothing to do with electromagnetism. Just pick up one
of these textbooks that you are sitting on. shrug
  #2  
Old August 23rd 11, 01:58 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
1treePetrifiedForestLane
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 974
Default The fundamental flaw of GR

so, you are assuming that gravity has nothing to do
with electromagnetism?

ever read of the Alfven cosmology with equal parts antimatter?

Hint: *GR has nothing to do with electromagnetism. *Just pick up one
of these textbooks that you are sitting on. *shrug


  #3  
Old August 23rd 11, 08:50 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
1treePetrifiedForestLane
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 974
Default The fundamental flaw of GR

I can recommend Eric Lerner's gut-level book;
he was a student of Alfven, I guess at UCSD,
working in the plasma lab.

*GR has nothing to do with electromagnetism. *Just pick up one

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Flaw the JWST Doesn't (Have to) Have? Quadibloc Amateur Astronomy 26 July 20th 11 12:28 AM
GR flaw update. Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 August 17th 09 07:32 AM
The Flaw of the Big Bang theory G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 2 July 31st 08 06:44 PM
FLOPS, a flaw ! SETI 0 October 19th 06 01:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.