|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
Mark McIntyre wrote: This is utter rubbish. The proof of physics is all around you, and this post defines you as a troll or an idiot. You choose. Sorry, I am not a priest and unable to help you. However, all I can do for you at the moment: Feyerabend Paul, "Against Method", # Paperback: 279 pages,Publisher: Verso; 3rd, edition (September 1993), Language: English,ISBN: 0860916464 But do not take me serious I am just a troll and always willing to use and apply your physics which you seemed to have proven true for the rest of us in this world. Thanks. Schneewittchen |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
granite stone wrote: I have re-written the article. Hope you understand it. However, a peer-reviewed paper about the topic: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/np...4250 c6725884 == Title: On the Relation between the Solar Activity Cycle and the Solar Tidal Force induced by the Planets Authors: Takahashi, Kozo Journal: Solar Physics, Vol. 3, p.598 (SoPh Homepage) Publication Date: 00/1968 == And then look for further references in the paper. Go to your next university library and ask for the journal "Solar Physics". Maybe I will find time for reading the article. Our department is actually subscribed to "Solar Physics". But I am not sure whether we have such old copies from 1968. Troll, Schneewittchen |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
Hard luck Jon, looks like someone beat you to it (at least the tidal bit). Have a go at something
else, thankfully there's loads we don't know yet. -- John Carruthers http://mysite.freeserve.com/jc_atm/ "Förster vom Silberwald" wrote in message oups.com... granite stone wrote: I have re-written the article. Hope you understand it. However, a peer-reviewed paper about the topic: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/np...4250 c6725884 == Title: On the Relation between the Solar Activity Cycle and the Solar Tidal Force induced by the Planets Authors: Takahashi, Kozo Journal: Solar Physics, Vol. 3, p.598 (SoPh Homepage) Publication Date: 00/1968 == And then look for further references in the paper. Go to your next university library and ask for the journal "Solar Physics". Maybe I will find time for reading the article. Our department is actually subscribed to "Solar Physics". But I am not sure whether we have such old copies from 1968. Troll, Schneewittchen |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
On 28 Feb 2006 00:49:57 -0800, in uk.sci.astronomy , "Förster vom
Silberwald" wrote: Mark McIntyre wrote: This is utter rubbish. The proof of physics is all around you, and this post defines you as a troll or an idiot. You choose. Sorry, I am not a priest and unable to help you. However, all I can do for you at the moment: .... is send me a different message via private mail. If you have something to say, say it in public where the discussion began. You wrote Let us bet: you has never written a scientific peer-reviewed paper. Neither did you attend in any scientific meeting. All you can do: reading popular books about the subject. Humorous. For the record, I have an degree from Oxford university in Phyisics (specialising in atomic and nuclear), and worked for several years as a research assistant at the same university. I spent five of that working towards a DPhil in cryogenic engineering, the rest working on superconductivity. I confess that other than my thesis and a couple of minor papers I've not had anything published. I'm not Peter in disguise. The worst what happend to this world: semi-educated retards like you who think they have any proof. I agree about the semi-educated retards. Schneewittchen (scientist for a living) Though apparently not applying what you've learned here. Your moniker also doesn't lend much credence. Fairytales? But do not take me serious I am just a troll No worries, I had to unkillfile this thread to respond to your private mail, since I don't reply to unsolicited email. Its right back in the bitbucket already. Mark McIntyre -- ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
Mark McIntyre wrote: No worries, I had to unkillfile this thread to respond to your private mail, since I don't reply to unsolicited email. Its right back in the bitbucket already. Hey: I ama troll and do not feed the trolls. However, I wrote you a private email where I said you are just an idot. You were the one first calling me names in public. But let me suggest: write me your description of your experiment where you prove that physics is right. And do not forget: head banging your head into a wall is no proof for particles and matter. That said. Troll, Schneewittchen |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
granite stone wrote:
As the author of this article I don't regret what I said. In the 1920's scientist thought the universe was just the milky way and all bright objects (other galaxies) were part of the milky way. Can you believe it? Until Hubble proved that bright objects were far away outside of the galaxy (1925), everyone did not know about galaxies other than our own. So I don't see why I can not write here about why the sun is hot or where magma comes from. I am well aware of Newton's first law and if you know the mass of something you can work out the energy. I stil think we should push the envelop and discover new ideas. You are all stuck inside of a box. New ideas are good, Jon. But even better are new ideas that conform with physical reality. The relative ignorance of astronomers 80 some years ago or whenever is hardly a good reason to ignore what it known today. There is more to study and learn now than ever before. Inventing half-baked theories without endeavoring to understand today's knowledge is hardly a path to greater enlightenment .. and, no surpise, will lead to ridicule from those who have taken the time to achieve such understanding. Phil |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
Hay Phil, if Jupitr is the reason the sun is hot ( Disreguarding the Nuke
reaction going on in it's center ) then can he give a reason why there are clouds of dust and gas that don't have planets and yet they are millions of degrees hot? Hay, maybe I could sell him my oil well in Hawaii? -- The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond Telescope Buyers FAQ http://home.inreach.com/starlord Sidewalk Astronomy www.sidewalkastronomy.info Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net In Garden Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden Blast Off Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/starlords "Phil Wheeler" wrote in message ... granite stone wrote: As the author of this article I don't regret what I said. In the 1920's scientist thought the universe was just the milky way and all bright objects (other galaxies) were part of the milky way. Can you believe it? Until Hubble proved that bright objects were far away outside of the galaxy (1925), everyone did not know about galaxies other than our own. So I don't see why I can not write here about why the sun is hot or where magma comes from. I am well aware of Newton's first law and if you know the mass of something you can work out the energy. I stil think we should push the envelop and discover new ideas. You are all stuck inside of a box. New ideas are good, Jon. But even better are new ideas that conform with physical reality. The relative ignorance of astronomers 80 some years ago or whenever is hardly a good reason to ignore what it known today. There is more to study and learn now than ever before. Inventing half-baked theories without endeavoring to understand today's knowledge is hardly a path to greater enlightenment .. and, no surpise, will lead to ridicule from those who have taken the time to achieve such understanding. Phil |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
Starlord wrote:
Hay Phil, if Jupitr is the reason the sun is hot ( Disreguarding the Nuke reaction going on in it's center ) then can he give a reason why there are clouds of dust and gas that don't have planets and yet they are millions of degrees hot? Hay, maybe I could sell him my oil well in Hawaii? Maybe ... or perhaps other things |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
Interesting ambiguity there. No, I cannot believe that the universe is just
the Milky Way! On a serious note, interactions between two astronomical bodies affect the smaller one more than the larger one. Therefore if the Sun's surface were hot due to Jupiter's influence, just think how much hotter Jupiter's surface would be due to the Sun. Jupiter's isn't, so the Sun's must be for some other reason. "granite stone" wrote in message ups.com... As the author of this article I don't regret what I said. In the 1920's scientist thought the universe was just the milky way and all bright objects (other galaxies) were part of the milky way. Can you believe it? Until Hubble proved that bright objects were far away outside of the galaxy (1925), everyone did not know about galaxies other than our own. So I don't see why I can not write here about why the sun is hot or where magma comes from. I am well aware of Newton's first law and if you know the mass of something you can work out the energy. I still think we should push the envelop and discover new ideas. You are all stuck inside of a box. Jon Riley Toronto |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Sun's Hot Surface: Influence of Jupiter on our Sun~~~
John Carruthers wrote:
Hard luck Jon, looks like someone beat you to it (at least the tidal bit). Have a go at something else, thankfully there's loads we don't know yet. snip Word of advice: Never argue with an idiot, he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience... :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | CAPCOM | Astronomy Misc | 16 | February 21st 06 01:07 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | CAPCOM | UK Astronomy | 17 | February 21st 06 01:07 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | August 1st 04 09:08 PM |
The apollo faq | the inquirer | UK Astronomy | 5 | April 15th 04 04:45 AM |
significant addition to section 25 of the faq | heat | UK Astronomy | 1 | April 15th 04 01:20 AM |