Satellite falls on Canada?

On Sep 30, 12:28*pm, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article 213efe35-ac2c-42b4-92e8-5cd31fc0c566
@n12g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...



Obviously objective evidence doesn't matter to FUD-masters like
yourself, so it's perfectly understandable how you would either
implode or self-destruct if having to review any objective evidence
that proves otherwise about WTC7 or anything else going against the
mainstream status-quo.

You seem rather bipolar. *Doesn't "motive, means and opportunity" mean
anything to those of your bipolar kind?

"motive, means and opportunity" become important *after* it has been
determined that a crime has been committed. *The evidence gathered about
WTC7 does not indicate that "controlled demolition charges" were used to
bring it down. *

* * "An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof." ? Marcello
Truzzi, On the Extraordinary: An Attempt at Clarification, Zetetic
Scholar, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 11, 1978

* *"A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence" -
David Hume.

The conspiracy theorists "proof" concerning WTC7 is as convincing as
that of their "proof" that the US never landed astronauts on the moon.

Jeff
--
" Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it
* up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. "
* *- tinker

Your denial of being in denial is noted.

In article 46ccc94c-dea5-485e-8076-
, says...

On Sep 30, 12:28*pm, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article 213efe35-ac2c-42b4-92e8-5cd31fc0c566
@n12g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...



Obviously objective evidence doesn't matter to FUD-masters like
yourself, so it's perfectly understandable how you would either
implode or self-destruct if having to review any objective evidence
that proves otherwise about WTC7 or anything else going against the
mainstream status-quo.

You seem rather bipolar. *Doesn't "motive, means and opportunity" mean
anything to those of your bipolar kind?

"motive, means and opportunity" become important *after* it has been
determined that a crime has been committed. *The evidence gathered about
WTC7 does not indicate that "controlled demolition charges" were used to
bring it down. *

* * "An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof." ? Marcello
Truzzi, On the Extraordinary: An Attempt at Clarification, Zetetic
Scholar, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 11, 1978

* *"A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence" -
David Hume.

The conspiracy theorists "proof" concerning WTC7 is as convincing as
that of their "proof" that the US never landed astronauts on the moon.

Jeff
--
" Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it
* up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. "
* *- tinker

Your denial of being in denial is noted.

Your complete lack of critical thinking skills is noted.

Jeff
--
" Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it
up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. "
- tinker

On 1/10/2011 2:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
On Sep 30, 12:30 pm, Jeff wrote:
In article2a4ebb55-cf6e-4547-99ce-0ff033ed0933
@fx14g2000vbb.googlegroups.com, says...



Seems as Earth loses mass

The Earth is losing a significant portion of its mass? Cite?

Jeff
--
" Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it
up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. "
- tinker

Loss of helium, and more than a wee bit of hydrogen.

Gain of stuff constantly falling in from space (I don't mean space
junk). What's the net outcome?

I've given numbers before. Go fish.

BTW; how much did Earth initially weigh?

I don't think there's any way you could identify a point in time and say
"OK, that's the Earth, but before that it wasn't the Earth". So you'd
have to choose an arbitrary moment and ask what the mass was at that
moment. That question would be pretty much unanswerable, but its
arbitrariness would also make it pretty pointless.

Sylvia.