|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Another rotation question
Reading the postings about the earth's rotation has led me to a
question. Suppose a spherical cloud of dust is rotating about a star and that this cloud has no inherent spin. i.e. the "innermost" particles of the cloud, for the moment, always face the star. When this cloud collapses into a planet, will the planet spin on an axis? If so which way? I've always been intrigued by this question, but sadly my knowledge of math and physical is rather limited. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Another rotation question
"BigKhat" wrote in message
om... Reading the postings about the earth's rotation has led me to a question. Suppose a spherical cloud of dust is rotating about a star and that this cloud has no inherent spin. i.e. the "innermost" particles of the cloud, for the moment, always face the star. When this cloud collapses into a planet, will the planet spin on an axis? If so which way? I've always been intrigued by this question, but sadly my knowledge of math and physical is rather limited. Let's start off by being clear about the initial conditions. Do you posit a spherical cloud surrounding the star, or a spherical cloud orbiting about the star as a unit (kind of like a very diffuse planet)? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Another rotation question
Greg Neill wrote
"BigKhat" wrote in message . com... Reading the postings about the earth's rotation has led me to a question. Suppose a spherical cloud of dust is rotating about a star and that this cloud has no inherent spin. i.e. the "innermost" particles of the cloud, for the moment, always face the star. When this cloud collapses into a planet, will the planet spin on an axis? If so which way? I've always been intrigued by this question, but sadly my knowledge of math and physical is rather limited. Let's start off by being clear about the initial conditions. Do you posit a spherical cloud surrounding the star, or a spherical cloud orbiting about the star as a unit (kind of like a very diffuse planet)? Good question, bearing in mind the second option is an impossible situation, and as such, incapable of a realistic solution. Denis -- DT Replace nospam with the antithesis of hills |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Another rotation question
"Greg Neill" wrote in message ...
"BigKhat" wrote in message om... Reading the postings about the earth's rotation has led me to a question. Suppose a spherical cloud of dust is rotating about a star and that this cloud has no inherent spin. i.e. the "innermost" particles of the cloud, for the moment, always face the star. When this cloud collapses into a planet, will the planet spin on an axis? If so which way? I've always been intrigued by this question, but sadly my knowledge of math and physical is rather limited. Let's start off by being clear about the initial conditions. Do you posit a spherical cloud surrounding the star, or a spherical cloud orbiting about the star as a unit (kind of like a very diffuse planet)? Sorry, I was vague. I mean the latter (diffuse planet) rather than the former. Thanks! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Another rotation question
"BigKhat" wrote in message m... "Greg Neill" wrote in message ... "BigKhat" wrote in message om... Reading the postings about the earth's rotation has led me to a question. Suppose a spherical cloud of dust is rotating about a star and that this cloud has no inherent spin. i.e. the "innermost" particles of the cloud, for the moment, always face the star. When this cloud collapses into a planet, will the planet spin on an axis? If so which way? I've always been intrigued by this question, but sadly my knowledge of math and physical is rather limited. Let's start off by being clear about the initial conditions. Do you posit a spherical cloud surrounding the star, or a spherical cloud orbiting about the star as a unit (kind of like a very diffuse planet)? Sorry, I was vague. I mean the latter (diffuse planet) rather than the former. Thanks! Planets do not actually agglomerate that way, but if there was a self-gravitating cloud of small objects such as you describe, it would of course be spinning initially with period of rotation = period of orbital revolution (it would definitely not be "not spinning"). As it condenses into a smaller planet of the same mass as the cloud, its rotation must speed up because it conserves its angular momentum. Angular momentum = moment of inertia (of a sphere in this case) times angular spin rate (radians per second). The moment of inertia is 2/5 m r^2 (2/5 times mass times radius squared) so, if the initial cloud was 10 times larger in diameter than the planet it coalesced to become, the spin rate would make the day 1/100 of the orbital year. This explanation ignores tidal effects, which might be important if the protoplanet was close to the star. -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove "pants" spamblock to send e-mail) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) | Lord Blacklight | Astronomy Misc | 56 | November 21st 03 02:45 PM |
Question about alignment & pointing north, level | Mike | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | September 7th 03 12:04 AM |
PX question | Bored Huge Krill | Astronomy Misc | 4 | August 10th 03 02:54 AM |
where did the dark matter that causes flat rotation curves in gal | Oriel36 | Astronomy Misc | 17 | July 19th 03 02:02 PM |