|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo 17 SM panel
Jan Philips ) writes:
We all know about the service module panel blown off on Apollo 13. I have a photo of Apollo 17 in lunar orbit where a panel is missing (History of NASA by Dewaard, page 80). Is it normal for a panel to be missing, or did A17 lose one somehow (just the skin)? Apollos 15-17, aka the J Missions, had a Service Module that contained a Scientific Instrument Module Bay, and upon attaining lunar orbit, it's covering panel was blown off, so that the scientific instruments could do their jobs. Apollo 13's SM had no such section. It's panel was blown off ny the oxygen tank explosion. With all your specific questions, you would do well to get a copy of Andrew Chaikin's " A Man On The Moon " and reading it in detail. The answers to all your posted questions can be found within. Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo 17 SM panel
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo 17 SM panel
Doug... ) writes:
In article , says... Jan Philips ) writes: We all know about the service module panel blown off on Apollo 13. I have a photo of Apollo 17 in lunar orbit where a panel is missing (History of NASA by Dewaard, page 80). Is it normal for a panel to be missing, or did A17 lose one somehow (just the skin)? Apollos 15-17, aka the J Missions, had a Service Module that contained a Scientific Instrument Module Bay, and upon attaining lunar orbit, it's covering panel was blown off, so that the scientific instruments could do their jobs. Minor nit -- the SIM bay "door" (the SM panel that covered the SIM bay) was jettisoned about three hours prior to Lunar Orbit Insertion. The CSM was pointed in such a way that the SIM bay door would be pushed well out of the CSM's path as it entered lunar orbit. It was the best way to ensure there would never be any recontact between the door and the spacecraft. Ah. Point and nit taken. g Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo 17 SM panel
In article , Andre Lieven wrote:
In the not so humble consensus of this happy newsgroup, its about the best single volume book on the US space program of the period, along with points on the competing Soviet one. However, it's /the/ best three-volume-book-made-from-one-volume-of-text, no questions g -- -Andrew Gray |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo 17 SM panel
Andrew Gray ) writes:
In article , Andre Lieven wrote: In the not so humble consensus of this happy newsgroup, its about the best single volume book on the US space program of the period, along with points on the competing Soviet one. However, it's /the/ best three-volume-book-made-from-one-volume-of-text, no questions g g Indeed. Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo 17 SM panel
"Andre Lieven" wrote in message ... In the not so humble consensus of this happy newsgroup, its about the best single volume book on the US space program of the period, along with points on the competing Soviet one. I would say it's one of the best overviews. If you're looking for specific systems, there are also some excellent books (Stages to Saturn for example, and Chariots for Apollo come to mind as focusing on specific areas.) The HBO miniseries " From The Earth To The Moon " was based on it, for instance, and also was excellent in it's own right. Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo 17 SM panel
Minor nit -- the SIM bay "door" (the SM panel that covered the SIM bay)
was jettisoned about three hours prior to Lunar Orbit Insertion. The CSM was pointed in such a way that the SIM bay door would be pushed well out of the CSM's path as it entered lunar orbit. It was the best way to ensure there would never be any recontact between the door and the spacecraft. Nit question: did the panel impact the Moon, wind up in lunar orbit, free-return to Earth, or wind up in a heliocentric orbit? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo 17 SM panel
TVDad Jim ) writes:
Minor nit -- the SIM bay "door" (the SM panel that covered the SIM bay) was jettisoned about three hours prior to Lunar Orbit Insertion. The CSM was pointed in such a way that the SIM bay door would be pushed well out of the CSM's path as it entered lunar orbit. It was the best way to ensure there would never be any recontact between the door and the spacecraft. Nit question: did the panel impact the Moon, wind up in lunar orbit, free-return to Earth, or wind up in a heliocentric orbit? My bet would be heliocentric, or some other non Earth or Moon orbit, as the J missions went off free-return trajectories, IIRC, well before entering the Moon's gravitational influence. And, the velocity of the CSM-LM at the point of SM panel jett would such as to not allow for any Lunar orbits. Its that velocity that had to dump about 2,000 MPH in order to enter Lunar orbit. Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo 17 SM panel
In article ,
says... TVDad Jim ) writes: Minor nit -- the SIM bay "door" (the SM panel that covered the SIM bay) was jettisoned about three hours prior to Lunar Orbit Insertion. The CSM was pointed in such a way that the SIM bay door would be pushed well out of the CSM's path as it entered lunar orbit. It was the best way to ensure there would never be any recontact between the door and the spacecraft. Nit question: did the panel impact the Moon, wind up in lunar orbit, free-return to Earth, or wind up in a heliocentric orbit? My bet would be heliocentric, or some other non Earth or Moon orbit, as the J missions went off free-return trajectories, IIRC, well before entering the Moon's gravitational influence. And, the velocity of the CSM-LM at the point of SM panel jett would such as to not allow for any Lunar orbits. Its that velocity that had to dump about 2,000 MPH in order to enter Lunar orbit. I'd bet on heliocentric or extremely elongated Earth orbit. The door had about 3 fps imparted to it by the explosive cording that separated it from the SM -- I'd think they would position the CSM/LM such that the additional velocity was added to the door's trajectory, so that it would separate *away* from the spacecraft after the LOI burn started. If you took that 3 fps and put it into the door's trajectory retrograde, to try to get it to impact the Moon, a) it probably wouldn't be sufficient, and b) you'd increase the chance of recontact once the LOI burn started and the spacecraft decelerated through the slightly depressed trajectory of the door. -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for | Doug Van Dorn thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup | |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apollo 1 Fire Jokes | Nomen Nescio | Space Shuttle | 5 | January 30th 04 01:18 AM |
NASA Names New Safety Advisory Panel | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | November 18th 03 11:23 PM |
NASA Administrator Accepts Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel Resignations | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 3 | September 24th 03 07:19 AM |
The Collins factor | Doug... | History | 27 | August 22nd 03 05:57 PM |
Panel Identifies Three Options For Space Telescope Transition | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 7 | August 16th 03 07:21 PM |