A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

titan, Cape vs. Vandenberg



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 26th 03, 06:40 PM
Mike Chan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Titan 4B - Cape vs. Vandenberg

(ed kyle) wrote in message . com...

You're right, Henry, but I will persist with my prediction
nontheless. I just have a feeling about this one for some
reason. The convergence of historical coincidences is only
part of what has convinced me that one EELV will be military,
and one NASA, oriented. Martin/Lockheed/Denver has a long
working relationship with the U.S. Air Force when it comes
to space launch, via the Titan program (they've flown Titans
every year since 1959). Boeing/McDonnell/Douglas/Rockwell,
on the other hand, historically built hardware for NASA
(Mercury/Gemini/Apollo spacecraft, Saturn stages, Delta
rockets, STS orbiters).


[snip]

Mind you, I'm not saying this was all planned. I'm just saying
that it was historically inevitable.


And then there is your earlier post on Atlas V using LC41 an AF
heritage pad vs Delta IV using LC37 a NASA heritage pad.

This is like reading an Asimov Foundation story.

However, Atlas V does provide lift capability with 531, 541, and 551
that falls between Delta 4450 and 4050H. Depending on what OSP comes
out to be, Atlas V may provide a sweet spot in lift capability that
Delta IV does not. Another note is two NASA planetary missions are
using Atlas V -- MRO on a 401 and the New Horizons Pluto mission (if
it doesn't get cancelled) on a 551 (over a 4050H most likely on cost).
MRO might have had a choice of Delta III vs. Atlas III, and NASA went
with Atlas. "Might" since Atlas III did have slightly more capability
than Delta III, and MRO, being built by LMAO, could have massed out to
require the extra margin of Atlas III.

Incidentally, I never read the reason MRO switched from Atlas III
to Atlas V 401. Mass growth or LMAO proposed change to get an earlier
end to balloon tank support structure (MRO being the furthest out user
of Atlas III)?

Ideally, OSP would launch on either, and NASA could negotiate for the
best deal on individual launches. But it may turn out that a package
deal for a whole bunch of launches on one would be cheaper. OSP
support facilities would not need to be duplicated at two different
LC's.

We will know more about how this will turn out within a few
months - after the next EELV contracts are let, after NASA
picks the X-37 launch provider, and after we see what happens
when the first Delta Heavy flies.


Yes, EELV Buy 3 and the X-37 LV selection will be interesting...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Titan 4s costly AllanStern Space Shuttle 9 February 17th 04 05:02 AM
Titan 4 launch prep comms begin at Canaveral AllanStern Space Shuttle 0 February 14th 04 04:46 PM
Old Caltech Telescope Yields New Titan Science Ron Baalke Science 0 September 23rd 03 05:50 AM
Will the real Titan II 1st stage stand up Rusty B Technology 0 August 28th 03 06:42 PM
NASA Selects Winning Student Design For Titan Aerial Vehicle Ron Baalke Technology 0 August 7th 03 06:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.