|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
39 years ago, today
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
39 years ago, today
Scott Hedrick wrote: I tell you, as a "CIA/KGB/MI-6 shill" myself, they're gettin' pretty far behind in the payroll. As a "Incest-Cloned Borg" I'm sure not getting much hot action out of the Seven of Nine unit. I haven't even been able to feel her implants yet. :-D Pat |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
39 years ago, today
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
e... Scott Hedrick wrote: I tell you, as a "CIA/KGB/MI-6 shill" myself, they're gettin' pretty far behind in the payroll. As a "Incest-Cloned Borg" I'm sure not getting much hot action out of the Seven of Nine unit. I haven't even been able to feel her implants yet. :-D Pat They're not implants; they're strictly home-grown. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
39 years ago, today
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
-- I'm not getting any action from the 7 of 9 unit either; too bad. Oval, arguing with the Guthball is a waste of time. Just killfile the misbegotten sod and be done with him. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
39 years ago, today
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message e... Scott Hedrick wrote: I tell you, as a "CIA/KGB/MI-6 shill" myself, they're gettin' pretty far behind in the payroll. As a "Incest-Cloned Borg" I'm sure not getting much hot action out of the Seven of Nine unit. I haven't even been able to feel her implants yet. :-D That damn Brad, I've worked very hard to be the kook for this ng. Much harder then he has, and in fact I deserve that title! But seriously... This thread reminds me of an old joke I first heard from George Carlin, rest his soul. Went something like ... "everyone that's driving faster than me is an asshole .....and everyone that's going slower is a moron". How true! In cars, and with opinions. uh oh...i sense a rant coming on.... Diversity is the source of life though. We shouldn't limit ourselves to just our narrow views. But explore all possibilities. Who knows, it may the opinions we ridicule just aren't being expressed very well. Or we aren't listening very well. Or explaining our opinions very well. But this idea of a hoax persists, and with a surprisingly large number of people, almost one in ten to this day still aren't certain Apollo was real. That in itself is rather interesting. Why doesn't this go away? Could it be that many people just don't trust our govt? I mean, our govt has given us plenty of reason for distrust over the years. Could it be that such a task seems so difficult and unlikely that some refuse to believe anyone could do it? I mean we went to the Moon nine times, why would we fake it nine times? Or, maybe some think our govt finds it easier to lie than accomplish such a remarkable feat. I mean it's a simple mathematical relationship. The more alike we are in every way, the less likely we are to learn anything new from each other. Which implies the more diverse the conversation, the better. For instance, I know for a fact almost everyone in this ng still clings to a linear view of reality. Even if you know what a non-linear equation is, that doesn't mean you've make the frame of reference change needed to comprehend the most basic properties of a non-linear universe. And having a linear perspective places one with those that believe the world is flat, in terms of their scientific understanding of reality. I talk with a bunch of 'flat-earthers' every day in this ng, and you don't hear me complaining much. Only trying to get the new math out there as best I can. But don't listen to me, Dear Emily spoke on this long ago. IF the foolish call them "flowers", Need the wiser tell? If the savants "classify" them, It is just as well! Those who read the Revelations Must not criticise Those who read the same edition With beclouded eyes! Could we stand with that old Moses Canaan denied,- Scan, like him, the stately landscape On the other side,- Doubtless we should deem superfluous Many sciences Not pursued by learned angels In scholastic skies! Low amid that glad Belles lettres Grant that we may stand, Stars, amid profound Galaxies, At that grand "Right hand"! Pat |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
39 years ago, today
They'd change the Sierra November signal in space to say "Do not EVA" instead of "Do not
lower boats". Sometime in the future, some space raider is going to use that signal. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
39 years ago, today
On Jul 22, 2:30*pm, "Matt Wiser" wrote:
They'd change the Sierra November signal in space to say "Do not EVA" instead of "Do not lower boats". Sometime in the future, some space raider is going to use that signal. "Resistance is Useless!" |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
39 years ago, today
On Jul 21, 7:08 am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote: In article , BradGuth wrote: On Jul 20, 5:47 pm, Orval Fairbairn wrote: In article , BradGuth wrote: On Jul 20, 4:36 pm, eyeball wrote: On Jul 20, 3:01 pm, BradGuth wrote: 39 years ago, today, we were lied to by those having the right stuff, and their lies upon lies have never stopped. - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth Alan Erskine wrote: One small step was taken for man(kind). True. With your density, the gravitational pull couldn't be overcome by a Saturn V. Our Zionist/Nazi Saturn V only got our Apollo package safely into a good LEO, whereas supposedly everything else was accomplished by their trusty command module and of its one rocket thruster with tonnes of spare fuel. - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth No -- the S-IVB had restart capability and performed the translunar injection phase of the flight, as well as insertion into parking orbit. I know -- I helped design the trajectories and determine performance capabilities. -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. Terrific, as then you'll have no problems telling us all we want to know about the Selene/moon L1, such as how much energy per tonne of craft does it take for a lunar month worth of station-keeping within that interactive zone of near zero gravity. The S-IVB was in deed a major part of the attached command module. As I'd said, one thruster/rocket engine and tonnes of spare fuel is what got those Apollo missions safely and so quickly to our moon's L1. Of how much continued on to orbit and photograph our moon w/o crew is what's not being shared by those in charge of history. - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth Irrelevant! Translunar trajectories do not go to L1, L2, L3 or L4 LaGrangian points -- they go directly to a periselinium target, where the CM retrofires to establish a lunar orbit. Some translunar trajectories have a "free return" capability, but they have a very narrow launch window, as do direct ascent trajectories, which dispense with the Earth parking orbit. -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. In other words, you're going to avoid/exclude any possible context with regard to the taboo/nondisclosure aspects of our Selene/moon L1 zone. Figures, doesn't it. - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
39 years ago, today
On Jul 21, 10:40 am, "The Mighty T.B." party
wrote: "BradGuth" farted: (snip) Terrific, as then you'll have no problems telling us all we want to know about the Selene/moon L1, such as how much energy per tonne of craft does it take for a lunar month worth of station-keeping within that interactive zone of near zero gravity. The S-IVB was in deed a major part of the attached command module. As I'd said, one thruster/rocket engine and tonnes of spare fuel is what got those Apollo missions safely and so quickly to our moon's L1. Of how much continued on to orbit and photograph our moon w/o crew is what's not being shared by those in charge of history. - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth If you're going to troll, at least try to have a basic understanding of what you're babbling on about. Not to mention brushing up on basic English language sentence structure would be a tremendous help. T.B. Did you get that approved script out of your Zionist/Nazi DARPA manual? - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
39 years ago, today
On Jul 21, 11:09 am, "Jeff Findley"
wrote: "The Mighty T.B." party wrote in messagenews:4q6dnYqVwbQRVBnVnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@gigan ews.com... "BradGuth" farted: (snip) - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth If you're going to troll, at least try to have a basic understanding of what you're babbling on about. Not to mention brushing up on basic English language sentence structure would be a tremendous help. There is no stopping Brad Guth. Just killfile him. That's not very nice, but considering it's coming from yet another Zionist/Nazi minion or brown-nosed clown of DARPA, it's the best anyone should expect. - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
50 years ago today. | Bruce Watson | Satellites | 0 | October 4th 07 08:31 PM |
Mariner 2 - 44 years ago today | g. beat | History | 1 | August 27th 06 04:55 PM |
25 years ago today: dreams die | Henry Spencer | History | 42 | August 10th 05 06:39 PM |
44 years ago today (May 25, 1961) | Eric Chomko | Policy | 38 | June 8th 05 12:39 AM |
ten years ago today | Henry Spencer | History | 1 | July 29th 03 10:40 PM |