|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Interplanetary Express
I was thinking recently what would be requirements of an ideal
interplanetary spacecraft capable of carrying humans around the solar system within reasonable times (ie 1 week to 2 years) ignoring the costs of development. I thought the following would be necessary: Radiation protection Artificial-gravity generation Fuel/Food supplies/generation for up to 4 years Adequate living space Ship velocities of up 100km/s 100km/s Debris Impact Shield In focusing on the velocity aspect and propulsion requirements I chose 100km/s because if you take a solar system map or NASA's solar system simulator you can see at 100km/s you can get almost anywhere within the times shown above and still have enough delta-V to break orbit from some of the largest gas giants. I also concluded that in order for the ship achieve these travel times it should achieve 100km/s within 1 day (24hrs). This means for a ship of mass, 1000 tons, a force of 1160kN would be required to produce an acceleration of 1.16m/s^2 at 0.12 gees. Is this right? Also what kind of propulsion system could achieve this? Thermo-nuclear? Vasimr? Fusion? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Interplanetary Express
Dre wrote:
I was thinking recently what would be requirements of an ideal interplanetary spacecraft capable of carrying humans around the solar system within reasonable times (ie 1 week to 2 years) ignoring the costs of development. I thought the following would be necessary: Radiation protection Artificial-gravity generation Fuel/Food supplies/generation for up to 4 years Adequate living space Ship velocities of up 100km/s 100km/s Debris Impact Shield In focusing on the velocity aspect and propulsion requirements I chose 100km/s because if you take a solar system map or NASA's solar system simulator you can see at 100km/s you can get almost anywhere within the times shown above and still have enough delta-V to break orbit from some of the largest gas giants. I also concluded that in order for the ship achieve these travel times it should achieve 100km/s within 1 day (24hrs). This means for a ship of mass, 1000 tons, a force of 1160kN would be required to produce an acceleration of 1.16m/s^2 at 0.12 gees. Is this right? Also what kind of propulsion system could achieve this? Thermo-nuclear? Vasimr? Fusion? The really difficult thing is the radiator. Heat engines need to get rid of heat. Some fundamental relations for a simplified model follow -- not quite as simplified as "Assume constant acceleration", though. I think if you try them out, you'll find there are better acceleration schedules to follow than your "achieve 100km/s within 1 day". You have the fission reactor and the ultra-high-performance radiator; why not use them for most of the trip? (If you have a fusion reactor, it hardly matters. The radiator is the limiting factor.) These rules take into account how an ion rocket's acceleration varies as its constant thrust acts on its diminishing mass. Imagine a ruler of length 'D', negligible mass, sitting in vacuum, free fall, and assign a fraction 'f' of its length that a rocketship flying along the edge will traverse with its motor on -- either forward or braking acceleration. [1] PoweredFlightTime = sqrt (2fDJ/Z) + fD/J [2] MassRatio = 1 + PoweredFlightTime*Z/(0.5*J^2) [3] T = PoweredFlightTime + (1-f)*D/(J/2 * ln (MassRatio)) [4] FinalAcceleration = 2Z/J [5] InitialAcceleration = 2Z/(J*MassRatio). 'Z' is the ratio of kinetic power in the departing propellant stream to nonpropellant mass. 'J' is how fast the propellant is thrown. I don't know what values of 'Z' are seriously proposed; 1 kilowatt per kilogram sounds difficult, but conceivable. So a vessel with mass 30 tonnes, plus propellant -- the stuff that will be thrown aft as ions -- will have 'Z' = 1 kW/kg if it can put 30 MW into the jet. That can probably be done with a 300-thermal-megawatt reactor and a 270-thermal-MW radiator; conceivably just 150 MW, with 120 MW dumped. Putting 'J', the ion expulsion speed, to 37,000 m/s, we get that if Mars and Earth were motionless with respect to each other, 63 million km apart, and the ship crossed between them with its ion rocket working through 0.4 of the distance ('f'=0.4), and their gravity could be ignored -- as might be fairly close to true if the trip were between space stations in high orbit around each planet -- a trip between them could take a little over 40 days. PV panels could provide much lower values of 'Z' at Earth, lower still at Mars; that variability cannot be handled by the simple functions of 'D', 'Z', 'f', and 'J' except maybe very crudely, by putting in an average. Try it. Interestingly, larger values of 'f', such as thrusting all the way, 'f' = 1.0, mean you arrive later. So of course do much smaller values. --- Graham Cowan http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.doc -- How individual mobility gains nuclear cachet. Link if you want it to happen. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interplanetary trajectory software? | Steen | Technology | 2 | March 31st 04 05:09 PM |
Mars Express radio link with Mars Rovers | Explorer8939 | Science | 6 | January 17th 04 02:13 AM |
"Lack of Opportunity to Express Minority Opinions" | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 1 | November 25th 03 04:29 PM |