Aether has mass

On Dec 1, 12:21*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 1, 2:59*pm, Brad Guth wrote:









On Dec 1, 11:55*am, mpc755 wrote:

On Dec 1, 2:39*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Nov 28, 12:28*pm, Casimiro wrote:

On 28 Nov, 21:09, Brad Guth wrote:

On Nov 28, 12:06, doppio-A doppio...@ hush.com ha scritto:

On Nov 27, 5:46, Painius starswir...@ aol.com ha scritto: On Tue, 6 novembre 2012 13:18:09 -0500, HVAC h...@ physisist.net ha scritto :
On 2012/11/06 12:55, Mike Cavedon ha scritto:

Questo è veramente * un filo *, eh? Secondo il conteggio da parte mia
Newsreader, questo post per me anche il 1000 - 1000 ° - dopo
In questo thread.

Ricevo qualcosa per questo? lol!

.

Per questo motivo Google ha rotto la parte vecchia del filo, e il
Parte nuovo per postare 73.

Doppia-A

e ci sono 926 più per andare prima che il successivo ripristino.

Excuse my intromission. But I don't know were evidentiate my discovery
of ether's drift.http://youtu.be/otedHor5THM
*You are sure of the existence of ether, but up to now not any
experiment demonstrated it.

mpc755 will keep telling us that everything about the existence and
function of aether has been proven multiple ways and multiple times,
even though you and I can't necessarily agree with that.

What waves in a double slit experiment is the aether.

That's your subjective interpretation, and at best it sure as hell
isn't providing the force of gravity via aether displacement that you
keep insisting upon.

Perhaps giving aether the 50/50 of gravity might be worth considering.

Displaced aether pushing back toward matter IS gravity.

If you say so. How about getting one other physics authority to agree
with that?