|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Cronus would have been considered
seriously, had it not been initially proposed by "a certain detested egocentric astronomer". I wonder how such a person would have gotten thru grad school and presumably got a PhD. From what I understand about grad school, one needs reasonably decent people skills to get the faculty to want to grant the PhD to you. Or maybe it was a case of "Let's give him the PhD but not a position, he'll then leave us and we'll be rid of him". ? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
richard schumacher wrote: ...Cronus would have been considered seriously, had it not been initially proposed by "a certain detested egocentric astronomer". Anyone know who that was? Lowell himself? No, Lowell was dead. (They did ask his widow for suggestions, but she wasn't much help.) Don't know who the leading astronomical egos of that era were... -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone know who that was? Lowell himself? I don't know, but my guess would be TJJ See. About ten years ago Sky & Telescope did an article about the naming of Pluto. And made brief mention about the a-hole astronomer who suggested "Cronus". DOn't remember his name though. S&T does every so often articles about not just the scientists and telescope builders that "got it right", but also those that screwed up, flamed out, or didn't work out. A few months ago they talked about a scope in Australia that was built for observing with the eye, but then astrophotography was rapidly coming up as the better way to observe. And that that telescope was not suitable for astrophotograpy (it's drive wobbled too much and would smear photo images). Until it was refurbished a few years ago, but then a wildfire destroyed it. And then there was Fred Hoyle (IIRC) who favored the "steady state" model of the universe, and gave the flippant name "Big Bang" to the theory he didn't buy. But the observational evidence went against him (Don't you hate it when that happens! :-) ) but his name "Big Bang" stuck. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 16:05:34 GMT, (Henry Spencer)
wrote: Herschel originally named it "Georgium Sidus", i.e. George's Star, after the then king of England. That did not go over very well elsewhere in Europe. ....Nor did it go over well in Englandland, although they were a bit more private about their disenchantment with the idea. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 08:26:58 -0600, Pat Flannery
wrote: I know about Uranus and Herschel; ....Hey, let's leave Henry's personal life out of this, Pat. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 20:08:15 GMT, robert casey
wrote: I wonder how such a person would have gotten thru grad school and presumably got a PhD. From what I understand about grad school, one needs reasonably decent people skills to get the faculty to want to grant the PhD to you. Or maybe it was a case of "Let's give him the PhD but not a position, he'll then leave us and we'll be rid of him". ? ....It depends on the school. Some "institutions of higher learning" tend to play the internal politics game to the hilt - which is how deep the grad students have to take it up the rear in order to get their Phuds. Other programs tend to ignore personal factors and base their judgements on how well the applicant passed his required courses and on the one thing that really does matter - the dissertation. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
In article et,
robert casey wrote: Cronus would have been considered seriously, had it not been initially proposed by "a certain detested egocentric astronomer". I wonder how such a person would have gotten thru grad school and presumably got a PhD. From what I understand about grad school, one needs reasonably decent people skills to get the faculty to want to grant the PhD to you... Office politics and having a supervisor with clout can counteract that to some extent. Also, there's no shortage of people who are first-class *******s by nature, but can grit their teeth and do a reasonable imitation of a civilized person when given overwhelming incentive. Finally, bear in mind that in 1930, one could still be a first-rate scientist or scholar without a PhD, given sufficient ability and a bit of luck. It wasn't as easy as it had been a few decades earlier, but it also wasn't as impossible as it became a few decades later. (A non-science example: JRR Tolkien was a renowned scholar and an Oxford professor with only a Master's degree.) -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
In article t,
robert casey wrote: Herschel originally named it "Georgium Sidus", i.e. George's Star, after the then king of England. That did not go over very well elsewhere in Europe. I see that kissing the boss's ass is a time honored tradition in human history... :-) Worked, too -- Herschel went from being a musician/composer with an interest in astronomy, to being the King's Astronomer with a £200/yr salary (rather a lot of money in those days) and a hobby of playing and composing music. But why "Uranus"? The mythological father of Saturn -- in the same way that Saturn was the father of Jupiter -- and one of the originators of astronomy. -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
robert casey wrote... About ten years ago Sky & Telescope did an article snip A few months ago they talked about a scope in Australia that was built for observing with the eye, but then astrophotography was rapidly coming up as the better way to observe. And that that telescope was not suitable for astrophotograpy (it's drive wobbled too much and would smear photo images). Until it was refurbished a few years ago, but then a wildfire destroyed it. Thats the Mount Stromlo complex at Canberra. Reconstruction is moving along, pic gallery etc at: http://www.mso.anu.edu.au/gallery/reconstruction "The Advanced Instrumentation and Technology Centre (AITC), which will replace the workshops destroyed in the fires of January 2003. It will offer expanded design, manufacturing and testing capabilities for precision optical instruments, opportunities for higher degree student participation in technical projects, and a research and development program focusing on Extremely Large Telescopes. Construction began in September 2003." - Peter |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Cronus would have been considered
seriously, had it not been initially proposed by "a certain detested egocentric astronomer". Anyone know who that was? Lowell himself? Oh, no. According to Clyde Tombaugh's autobiography (an EXCELLENT book, BTW, and I still think the entire story would make a terrific episode of "Nova"), the Lowell Observatory staff had only fond memories of Percival Lowell (who was by that time long dead). Tombaugh did not mention the name of this astronomer in question but, unfortunately, it seems the list of potential candidates was kind of long. At that time the Lowell Observatory was often regarded as the "bad boy" of astronomy. Tombaugh was only a junior astronomer (with only a high school education) at the time of Pluto's discovery, and the senior astronomers on the staff taught him a great deal not only about astronomy, but the world in general. They warned him that every screwball and con artist would soon descend upon him as soon as word of the planet's discovery got out, and "how right they were." Tombaugh wrote that because Pluto moves so slowly, they didn't have many pictures available of the planet's motion to plot a very accurate orbit. When telegrams from other astronomers arrived, Tombaugh's boss showed him one from California. "I remember how irritated Dr. Slipher was at this," Tombaugh wrote. It contained not a word of congratulations, only a request for orbit and position data. "All 'x' is interested in is what he can get out of it," said Dr. Slipher, so he ignored the request. Some days later, another telegram arrived from the California astronomer, this time "profuse with congratulations." Tombaugh didn't come right out and say so, but I think the Lowell Observatory staff would have regarded any naming ideas from Lowell's widow with more than a little bit of reluctance. She tried to break her husband's will, which bequeathed a lot of money for the observatory, and the litigation dragged on for years. By the time the observatory finally won the case, they'd lost a lot of money in the process. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - January 28, 2005 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 31st 05 09:33 AM |
Space Calendar - January 28, 2005 | [email protected] | History | 1 | January 31st 05 09:33 AM |
Space Calendar - December 23, 2004 | [email protected] | Misc | 0 | December 23rd 04 04:03 PM |
Space Calendar - December 23, 2004 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 23rd 04 04:03 PM |
Space Calendar - December 23, 2004 | [email protected] | History | 0 | December 23rd 04 04:03 PM |