A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Model of Electron (Quark/Lepton) by Tony Lance Dip.Math.(Open) MMXVII



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 28th 17, 03:54 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Tony Lance[_13_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 151
Default Model of Electron (Quark/Lepton) by Tony Lance Dip.Math.(Open) MMXVII

The Outlandish Particle Periodic Table (Particle Key)
4740 experimental, derived, modified and paired particle dataset
Key to Particle Numbers and Modifications (see link)
http://www.bigberthathing.com/partkey.html
Ten Caveats:-
1. Three equations out of nineteen.
2. Ten structures out of 2718.
3. Quad precision instead of slide rule.
4. Error Margin 4 MeV set to .00000035 MeV.
5. Base number 450 US trillion instead of 1450 US trillion.
6. Half CERN results modified.
7. Every particle has a pair like Neutron less than Proton pair.
8. This is Pure Mathematics on slide-rule results.
9. Applied Mathematics Particle classification system already.
10.Might need arbitrary precision instead of quad precision.

NB somebody wants citation of CERN experimental results.
http://www.bigberthathing.com/CERNfull.html
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 22:01:26 UTC+1, Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote:

It is a 50 year scientific project.
This is year 51.

  #2  
Old July 29th 17, 05:43 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Fred J. McCall[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,018
Default Model of Electron (Quark/Lepton) by Tony Lance Dip.Math.(Open) MMXVII

Tony Lance wrote:

The Outlandish Particle Periodic Table (Particle Key)
4740 experimental, derived, modified and paired particle dataset
Key to Particle Numbers and Modifications (see link)
http://www.bigberthathing.com/partkey.html
Ten Caveats:-
1. Three equations out of nineteen.
2. Ten structures out of 2718.
3. Quad precision instead of slide rule.


So false precision, then.


4. Error Margin 4 MeV set to .00000035 MeV.


More false precision.


5. Base number 450 US trillion instead of 1450 US trillion.
6. Half CERN results modified.


So half the actual data is distorted.


7. Every particle has a pair like Neutron less than Proton pair.
8. This is Pure Mathematics on slide-rule results.


No, it isn't. It is pure bull****.


9. Applied Mathematics Particle classification system already.
10.Might need arbitrary precision instead of quad precision.


Because you haven't distorted the accuracy of the actual data enough
already?


--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
  #3  
Old July 29th 17, 10:39 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Tony Lance[_13_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 151
Default Model of Electron (Quark/Lepton) by Tony Lance Dip.Math.(Open) MMXVII

Big Table using pure mathematics. (see link below)
This cannot be done using only CERN experimental results.
It relies on the classical conjecture that a neutron plus
a positron is equal to a proton. All neutral particles have
been reduced by .2% All particles with no known charge have
been taken as both. The positive charge has same mass and the
neutral charge has the reduction. Neither generates a pair,
but can only do so with a separate particle. These rules
generate the smallpairs table. The error margin is nominal
in place of the slide rule accuracy of the CERN results.
The above indicates that all particles have a pair.
The above rules and giving all particles a pair derives 4741
particles from the 1000 experimental results of CERN.

The software has been updated to version 5 and has no glass
ceiling. It is ready to run using only the input files
particle.dat and particle.txt Output file electron.lst for option 1
and particle.lst for option 2 need to be renamed or deleted prior
to each run. The first four answers to option 1 are 3, 4000, 2 and 9.
Option 3 has 5 answers;- minus goes back one, plus goes forward 20,
even goes back to first, quit exits this particle and more looks at
next page of this particle. For type 88 reduce the error margin and
for type 99 increase the error margin. The range is affected by
adjustments to the first error margin in the two dat and txt files and
subsequent error margins within them.
http://www.bigberthathing.com/OUTfirm.html

3.5d-06 down to 1.0d-06 down to 7.0d-07 down to 3.5d-07
OUTfull 4000 v5 449938097129016

NB Citation for CERN Monte Carlo particle numbering system, one of three,
the other two are for analysis. I drew a picture.
http://www.bigberthathing.com/montecarlo.png
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++
On Saturday, 29 July 2017 05:43:38 UTC+1, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Tony Lance wrote:

The Outlandish Particle Periodic Table (Particle Key)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Before Angkor Wat 5000 years ago by Tony Lance 23 min Tony Lance[_13_] Misc 0 January 16th 15 11:32 PM
Before Angkor Wat 5000 years ago by Tony Lance 23 min Tony Lance[_13_] Amateur Astronomy 0 January 16th 15 11:31 PM
Before Angkor Wat 5000 years ago by Tony Lance 23 min Tony Lance[_13_] Astronomy Misc 0 January 16th 15 11:31 PM
New Math Museum To Hopefully Open nightbat[_1_] Misc 0 June 14th 11 08:02 AM
Gravity Emergent from ODLRO Inflation Field out of Standard Quark-Lepton-GaugeBoson False Vacuum Jack Sarfatti Astronomy Misc 0 August 29th 06 05:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.