|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
You over simplify by making only two groups. The best teachers are always
learning. That's the crux of the problem with this board (NG)---the core sees themselves as sages to the unwashed masses. BS. It's a HOBBY. There are people that know as much about bowling as some of these clowns do about astronomy. So you have FS-128 and an SBIG camera. So what? Big damn deal. If a post is beneath you, SKIP IT. Most of these clowns just cannot resit because they think what they have to say matters. Do you really think I would spend $1500 on a recommendation from this nest of egos? Doink "Howard Lester" wrote in message ... Some of us like to teach, and some of us like to be spoon-fed. The two often don't mix. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Doink wrote: You over simplify by making only two groups. The best teachers are always learning. That's the crux of the problem with this board (NG)---the core sees themselves as sages to the unwashed masses. BS. It's a HOBBY. There are people that know as much about bowling as some of these clowns do about astronomy. So you have FS-128 and an SBIG camera. So what? Big damn deal. If a post is beneath you, SKIP IT. Most of these clowns just cannot resit because they think what they have to say matters. Do you really think I would spend $1500 on a recommendation from this nest of egos? Doink Are you accusing all of us of being human? Surely not? :-) Chris.B |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:34:48 -0700, "Doink"
wrote: You over simplify by making only two groups. The best teachers are always learning. That's the crux of the problem with this board (NG)---the core sees themselves as sages to the unwashed masses. BS. It's a HOBBY. There are people that know as much about bowling as some of these clowns do about astronomy. So you have FS-128 and an SBIG camera. So what? Big damn deal. If a post is beneath you, SKIP IT. Most of these clowns just cannot resit because they think what they have to say matters. Do you really think I would spend $1500 on a recommendation from this nest of egos? Doink Of course not. All they have to offer is a few thousand man-years of experience with scopes you constantly ask about. -Rich "Howard Lester" wrote in message ... Some of us like to teach, and some of us like to be spoon-fed. The two often don't mix. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Except they can't seem to express anything civilly which pretty much
nullifies the value of those few thousand years... really Rich, how much of the typical post is really information and how much is blather? The information is around 10% and the rest, not even opinion which would be of value, is egotisical blather parroted back from the books everyone reads on their breaks at Computerland or Frank's Auto Repair. Seriously, this NG has very little value. It's not a forum of free discussion. It's not welcoming to the mid level hobbyist---they love the naiive newbie and they love stroking each other off with silly "astro photographs"---but if someone actually challenges a thought, all hell breaks loose and the perverbial wheels come off. It's actually amusing to me how many of the regulars can't just skip a post they think to be beneath them. They simply must comment! Look at the dozens of drivel posts you put on this very thread! Doink "RichA" wrote in message ... On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:34:48 -0700, "Doink" wrote: You over simplify by making only two groups. The best teachers are always learning. That's the crux of the problem with this board (NG)---the core sees themselves as sages to the unwashed masses. BS. It's a HOBBY. There are people that know as much about bowling as some of these clowns do about astronomy. So you have FS-128 and an SBIG camera. So what? Big damn deal. If a post is beneath you, SKIP IT. Most of these clowns just cannot resit because they think what they have to say matters. Do you really think I would spend $1500 on a recommendation from this nest of egos? Doink Of course not. All they have to offer is a few thousand man-years of experience with scopes you constantly ask about. -Rich "Howard Lester" wrote in message ... Some of us like to teach, and some of us like to be spoon-fed. The two often don't mix. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Mij Adyaw wrote:
Have you ever considered moving this forum (essentially all of the good folks in this forum) to another location such as groups on Astromart or some other location where folks will have to post using their real names and real email addresses? Let's do it! Now, which one of us is going to process the applications for membership in the new group? We'll need these because it's not like we can just let people create a free email on Yahoo or somewhere and then let them in. We'll need people to send us their names, address, maybe a picture, etc. Why don't we have people email their applications to me and then you can verify these people are who they say they are. Sound good? -Skipward |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Skip,
You will also want a DNA sample, issue a card, and register with homeland security. This way when we are out with the scope and the "authorities" come to investigate we can say " back off I am a registered amateur astronomer and we will report anything suspicious" People who do not join must wear tracking collars so we know where they are and when they use laser pointers or foreign optics. If every one sends me money, I will go to DC and pay to have this turned into law. In the mean time all telescope and accessories must be registered and have a tax sticker issued by the SAA new order. This 'ill teach 'em Have a nice night Private Dan Skip Freeman wrote: Mij Adyaw wrote: Have you ever considered moving this forum (essentially all of the good folks in this forum) to another location such as groups on Astromart or some other location where folks will have to post using their real names and real email addresses? Let's do it! Now, which one of us is going to process the applications for membership in the new group? We'll need these because it's not like we can just let people create a free email on Yahoo or somewhere and then let them in. We'll need people to send us their names, address, maybe a picture, etc. Why don't we have people email their applications to me and then you can verify these people are who they say they are. Sound good? -Skipward |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
And you'll need to send Herb $50 too for 50 posts.
Doink "Skip Freeman" wrote in message oups.com... Mij Adyaw wrote: Have you ever considered moving this forum (essentially all of the good folks in this forum) to another location such as groups on Astromart or some other location where folks will have to post using their real names and real email addresses? Let's do it! Now, which one of us is going to process the applications for membership in the new group? We'll need these because it's not like we can just let people create a free email on Yahoo or somewhere and then let them in. We'll need people to send us their names, address, maybe a picture, etc. Why don't we have people email their applications to me and then you can verify these people are who they say they are. Sound good? -Skipward |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:15:31 -0700, "Doink"
wrote: Except they can't seem to express anything civilly which pretty much nullifies the value of those few thousand years... really Rich, how much of the typical post is really information and how much is blather? The information is around 10% and the rest, not even opinion which would be of value, is egotisical blather parroted back from the books everyone reads on their breaks at Computerland or Frank's Auto Repair. Seriously, this NG has very little value. It's not a forum of free discussion. You've been free to ask the same questions time after time, after time. -Rich |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Troll -
Mij Adyaw wrote: I would like to respectfully ask why so many of you tolerate this newsgroup. It seems to be full of trolls and other types of folks that get their jollies by antagonizing other members of the group. There are some very knowledgeable members of this group and I have learned much from being a member of this group. Year after year the problems in this newsgroup worsen. That is just the nature of Usenet and it will only get worse with time. Have you ever considered moving this forum (essentially all of the good folks in this forum) to another location such as groups on Astromart or some other location where folks will have to post using their real names and real email addresses? It seems that this solution would eliminate all of the trolls and other annoyances and we could have astronomy discussions without all of the flame wars. It seems that if a new home could be found, the group could be vacated rather quickly. Regards, -mij |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NOMINATION: digest, volume 2453397 | Ross | Astronomy Misc | 233 | October 23rd 05 04:24 AM |
The Usenet newsgroup sci.astro.planetarium FAQ | Mark C. Petersen | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 9th 04 09:57 PM |
The new sci.physics.strings newsgroup | Lubos Motl | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | December 22nd 03 04:12 PM |
The new sci.physics.strings newsgroup | Lubos Motl | Science | 0 | December 21st 03 09:47 PM |
antagonist's digest, volume 2452854 | dizzy | Astronomy Misc | 4 | August 7th 03 01:02 AM |