A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Gravity Spin and Blackholes

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 2nd 17, 11:55 PM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
Posts: 59
Default Gravity Spin and Blackholes

As a policy question this comment is to assist astronomers
in observation. Knowing the natural boundaries of
the sky can computationally filter visual data.

Here is a comment on gravity theory.

As per a recent comment on generalized spin theory
in sci.physics.research, spin is a variable of angular

I interpret the idea as a quanta of this angular field.
Spin 1 has a single dimension of momenta. Gravity is spin
2? If so this is a two dimensional field(space/time).
Making a four state angular momenta solution.

There are boundary solutions of spin state
that are visible.

they a

body revolution, then the opposite
body rotation

polar lens emission, then the opposite
black hole state

the moon revolves or is it rotating the Earth?
the earth rotates or is it revolving the sun?

When there is a polar emission, think of it as
beams emitting from the top and bottom of a sun like body.

And just the opposite a black hole has zero emission.
The body is internalized.

The only incomplete fact here is the quanta identity
of my emissions. It needs completing.

But in this attack it is clear that a blackhole
would have a profound instability. They can not
be given a zero instability.

A simplified boundary function needs help also.

But I think it helps
Old December 4th 17, 09:56 PM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
Posts: 59
Default Gravity Spin and Blackholes

Oh, for Ghu's sake, Dougie, please seek treatment!

rambling inanity elided

Why am I the only guy that can talk of the issue of
blackhole stability in a factual manner?

You tell me. Is the whole universe to be swallowed up
by a single blackhole?

You are clueless obviously. You do act like a sociopath
by the way.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chapt16.15 Maxwell Equations with EM-gravity; Gravity-Cell; OrbitalResonance; Spin-Orbit-Coupling #1451 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 April 2nd 13 01:23 AM
Physicists propose test for loop quantum gravity using blackholes Yousuf Khan[_2_] Astronomy Misc 8 January 6th 12 01:00 PM
Accelerating Motion and Spin = Gravity G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 12 October 25th 06 02:28 AM
Spin Acceleration Inertia Gravity G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 1 September 23rd 05 12:32 AM
NASA gives artificial gravity a new spin Jacques van Oene News 0 April 30th 05 09:09 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.