![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am new to astronomy and have been enjoying myself a great deal.
I started by just trying to learn the constellations, and then identifying some of the more prominent objects (i.e., planets). Recently purchased a Celestron 114GT telescope, and have set it up and aligned it per instructions. This has yielded my son and I some excellent views of the moon, mars, saturn, etc. and I like the way it will track objects. Here's my problem - I see in the astronomy magazines numerous and incredible photos of deep sky objects, generally taken by folks with telescopes much larger and more powerful than mine. Many things I read indicate that aperture may be more important than magnification. However, I don't know what to expect when looking for certain objects because nobody has given me any help with the scope and I have no point of reference except the magazines. For instance, I have been trying to locate M31 in Andromeda. I certainly know where to look, but don't know what to look for. How big should it look? Is it just star-sized, or should it be larger? Am I just not in a dark enough location (we actually don't have much light pollution where I live, but there are neighboring houses with external lights)? I know this sounds like a stupid question. However, expectation levels were set pretty high by the scope mfr's literature, and I'm afraid that I may be reaching the practical limitations of this scope. If so, this may be very disappointing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
have been trying to locate M31 in Andromeda. I
certainly know where to look, but don't know what to look for. How big should it look? Is it just star-sized, or should it be larger? You are looking for a dim, fuzzy, milky blob; like a cloud. Bright enough however to see in binoculars, try this first, then try your 'scope again. M31 should appear to cover a quarter to one third of your field of view at low power.You'll know it when you see it :-) jc --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 16/10/2003 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
have been trying to locate M31 in Andromeda. I
certainly know where to look, but don't know what to look for. How big should it look? Is it just star-sized, or should it be larger? You are looking for a dim, fuzzy, milky blob; like a cloud. Bright enough however to see in binoculars, try this first, then try your 'scope again. M31 should appear to cover a quarter to one third of your field of view at low power.You'll know it when you see it :-) jc --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 16/10/2003 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chin Up GRW the Andromeda galaxy IS viewable nicely in your scope. The
Andromeda Galaxy is a faint fuzzy in the 114 however. The way we help new ones at our club find the Andromeda Galaxy may help you: Locate the Great square of Pegasus, then viewing the Great square as if you were looking down on a baseball diamond, locate 3rd base. Now Follow the line towards the north star from 3rd base to the 2nd bright star from 3rd base. Now move up towards zenith 2 stars from that star and the Andromeda galaxy will be at about the 2 o'clock position. Learning to find deep sky objects takes a bit longer than finding stars, planets and the moon. You will find it very helpful to locate the nearest Astronomy club in your area. The members of any Astronomy club will be more than glad to assist you in enjoying your new telescope more. -- Clear and Dark Skies for all! _________________________ -------------------------------------------------- Tim Longwell Black River Astronomical Society http://junior.apk.net/~arstar50/BlackRiver.index.html _________________________ -------------------------------------------------- "GRW" wrote in message om... I am new to astronomy and have been enjoying myself a great deal. I started by just trying to learn the constellations, and then identifying some of the more prominent objects (i.e., planets). Recently purchased a Celestron 114GT telescope, and have set it up and aligned it per instructions. This has yielded my son and I some excellent views of the moon, mars, saturn, etc. and I like the way it will track objects. Here's my problem - I see in the astronomy magazines numerous and incredible photos of deep sky objects, generally taken by folks with telescopes much larger and more powerful than mine. Many things I read indicate that aperture may be more important than magnification. However, I don't know what to expect when looking for certain objects because nobody has given me any help with the scope and I have no point of reference except the magazines. For instance, I have been trying to locate M31 in Andromeda. I certainly know where to look, but don't know what to look for. How big should it look? Is it just star-sized, or should it be larger? Am I just not in a dark enough location (we actually don't have much light pollution where I live, but there are neighboring houses with external lights)? I know this sounds like a stupid question. However, expectation levels were set pretty high by the scope mfr's literature, and I'm afraid that I may be reaching the practical limitations of this scope. If so, this may be very disappointing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chin Up GRW the Andromeda galaxy IS viewable nicely in your scope. The
Andromeda Galaxy is a faint fuzzy in the 114 however. The way we help new ones at our club find the Andromeda Galaxy may help you: Locate the Great square of Pegasus, then viewing the Great square as if you were looking down on a baseball diamond, locate 3rd base. Now Follow the line towards the north star from 3rd base to the 2nd bright star from 3rd base. Now move up towards zenith 2 stars from that star and the Andromeda galaxy will be at about the 2 o'clock position. Learning to find deep sky objects takes a bit longer than finding stars, planets and the moon. You will find it very helpful to locate the nearest Astronomy club in your area. The members of any Astronomy club will be more than glad to assist you in enjoying your new telescope more. -- Clear and Dark Skies for all! _________________________ -------------------------------------------------- Tim Longwell Black River Astronomical Society http://junior.apk.net/~arstar50/BlackRiver.index.html _________________________ -------------------------------------------------- "GRW" wrote in message om... I am new to astronomy and have been enjoying myself a great deal. I started by just trying to learn the constellations, and then identifying some of the more prominent objects (i.e., planets). Recently purchased a Celestron 114GT telescope, and have set it up and aligned it per instructions. This has yielded my son and I some excellent views of the moon, mars, saturn, etc. and I like the way it will track objects. Here's my problem - I see in the astronomy magazines numerous and incredible photos of deep sky objects, generally taken by folks with telescopes much larger and more powerful than mine. Many things I read indicate that aperture may be more important than magnification. However, I don't know what to expect when looking for certain objects because nobody has given me any help with the scope and I have no point of reference except the magazines. For instance, I have been trying to locate M31 in Andromeda. I certainly know where to look, but don't know what to look for. How big should it look? Is it just star-sized, or should it be larger? Am I just not in a dark enough location (we actually don't have much light pollution where I live, but there are neighboring houses with external lights)? I know this sounds like a stupid question. However, expectation levels were set pretty high by the scope mfr's literature, and I'm afraid that I may be reaching the practical limitations of this scope. If so, this may be very disappointing. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
GRW" wrote in message
om... I am new to astronomy and have been enjoying myself a great deal. I started by just trying to learn the constellations, and then identifying some of the more prominent objects (i.e., planets). Recently purchased a Celestron 114GT telescope, and have set it up and aligned it per instructions. This has yielded my son and I some excellent views of the moon, mars, saturn, etc. and I like the way it will track objects. Here's my problem - I see in the astronomy magazines numerous and incredible photos of deep sky objects, generally taken by folks with telescopes much larger and more powerful than mine. Many things I read indicate that aperture may be more important than magnification. However, I don't know what to expect when looking for certain objects because nobody has given me any help with the scope and I have no point of reference except the magazines. For instance, I have been trying to locate M31 in Andromeda. I certainly know where to look, but don't know what to look for. How big should it look? Is it just star-sized, or should it be larger? Am I just not in a dark enough location (we actually don't have much light pollution where I live, but there are neighboring houses with external lights)? I know this sounds like a stupid question. However, expectation levels were set pretty high by the scope mfr's literature, and I'm afraid that I may be reaching the practical limitations of this scope. If so, this may be very disappointing. Hi there Like you, i have fun with my scope but didn't know what to see. I was recommended the following book which is now invaluable to me. "The Practical Astronomers Deep - Sky Companion" by Jess K Gilmour. This is part of the Sir Patrick Moore's Practical Astronomy Series. It is available in the USA from Springer (NY). The following link should take you to the page. I believe it retails at $44.95, but you may find it cheaper at Amazon.com. http://www.springer-ny.com/listpage....atrick%20Moore %27s%20Practical%20Astronomy%20Series&discipline=A stronomy&startat=1&sortBy= deVolume&cart=10664281194939277 If this link doesn't work try www.springer-ny.com and click on Astronomy browse by series Patrick Moore's Astronomy series.Then scroll down for this choice. If you can afford it you will be very happy. Since i bought it a few weeks ago i have seen many Messier and NGC objects and i use a 114mm and 200mm newtonian scopes. HTH Clear skies Martin A UK |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
GRW" wrote in message
om... I am new to astronomy and have been enjoying myself a great deal. I started by just trying to learn the constellations, and then identifying some of the more prominent objects (i.e., planets). Recently purchased a Celestron 114GT telescope, and have set it up and aligned it per instructions. This has yielded my son and I some excellent views of the moon, mars, saturn, etc. and I like the way it will track objects. Here's my problem - I see in the astronomy magazines numerous and incredible photos of deep sky objects, generally taken by folks with telescopes much larger and more powerful than mine. Many things I read indicate that aperture may be more important than magnification. However, I don't know what to expect when looking for certain objects because nobody has given me any help with the scope and I have no point of reference except the magazines. For instance, I have been trying to locate M31 in Andromeda. I certainly know where to look, but don't know what to look for. How big should it look? Is it just star-sized, or should it be larger? Am I just not in a dark enough location (we actually don't have much light pollution where I live, but there are neighboring houses with external lights)? I know this sounds like a stupid question. However, expectation levels were set pretty high by the scope mfr's literature, and I'm afraid that I may be reaching the practical limitations of this scope. If so, this may be very disappointing. Hi there Like you, i have fun with my scope but didn't know what to see. I was recommended the following book which is now invaluable to me. "The Practical Astronomers Deep - Sky Companion" by Jess K Gilmour. This is part of the Sir Patrick Moore's Practical Astronomy Series. It is available in the USA from Springer (NY). The following link should take you to the page. I believe it retails at $44.95, but you may find it cheaper at Amazon.com. http://www.springer-ny.com/listpage....atrick%20Moore %27s%20Practical%20Astronomy%20Series&discipline=A stronomy&startat=1&sortBy= deVolume&cart=10664281194939277 If this link doesn't work try www.springer-ny.com and click on Astronomy browse by series Patrick Moore's Astronomy series.Then scroll down for this choice. If you can afford it you will be very happy. Since i bought it a few weeks ago i have seen many Messier and NGC objects and i use a 114mm and 200mm newtonian scopes. HTH Clear skies Martin A UK |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the feedback.
Tonight is supposed to be clear and we'll go out and check things out. I don't know if my local bookstore would carry the book referred to, but I'll check Amazon. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the feedback.
Tonight is supposed to be clear and we'll go out and check things out. I don't know if my local bookstore would carry the book referred to, but I'll check Amazon. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the info.
Caught a good look at M31 last night. I think my problem before was that I was trying too high of a magnification. Now I'm looking forward to when Orion moves high enough in the sky so that I can see the nebulae in his sword. One problem I have here is that there are a lot of mountains and trees around my house that obscure the lower horizon. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Radioactive Potassium May Be Major Heat Source in Earth's Core | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 20 | December 21st 03 11:15 AM |
Radioactive Potassium May Be Major Heat Source in Earth's Core | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | December 15th 03 06:42 PM |
Space review: The vision thing | Kaido Kert | Policy | 156 | December 3rd 03 07:30 PM |
Astronomers Identify Source of Major Class of Supernova Explosions(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 9th 03 07:31 PM |
GravityShieldingUpdates1.1 | Stan Byers | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 1st 03 04:02 PM |