Flowing Space Model Being Taught at MIT!

"Professor Max Tegmark of MIT has incorporated the river model in his
General relativity teaching MIT Course 8.033, Schwarzschild metric &
black holes

A natural interpretation of equation (2) (Hamilton 2004) is that space
is flowing radially inward [...] and that particles can travel through
this moving space according to the laws of special relativity [...]
This is analogous to the FRW coordinates, where the "river" of space
was expanding rather than flowing."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_ta...fcva/archive_2

Double-A

nightbat wrote

Double-A wrote:
"Professor Max Tegmark of MIT has incorporated the river model in his
General relativity teaching MIT Course 8.033, Schwarzschild metric &
black holes

A natural interpretation of equation (2) (Hamilton 2004) is that space
is flowing radially inward [...] and that particles can travel through
this moving space according to the laws of special relativity [...]
This is analogous to the FRW coordinates, where the "river" of space
was expanding rather than flowing."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_ta...fcva/archive_2

Double-A

nightbat

The is just too way far over the heads of all the auk
coffeeboys Commander, most likely their collective junk gene baby brains
will simply clueless overload implode.

ponder on,
the nightbat

"Charles D. Bohne" wrote in message

... they might fear that the universe will crush them ;:

What a wonderful thought!

HJ

In article .com,
Double-A wrote:

A natural interpretation of equation (2) (Hamilton 2004) is that space
is flowing radially inward [...] and that particles can travel through
this moving space according to the laws of special relativity [...]
This is analogous to the FRW coordinates, where the "river" of space
was expanding rather than flowing."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_ta...fcva/archive_2

Double-A


Its an analogy just for BH's AA

--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.

COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).

In article ,
nightbat wrote:



The is just too way far over the heads of all the auk
coffeeboys Commander, most likely their collective junk gene baby brains
will simply clueless overload implode.


I've seen it before. As I re-iterate - its an analogy that only is in use for
Schwazschild BH's

--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.

COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).

Charles D. Bohne wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:16:25 -0400, nightbat
wrote:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_ta...fcva/archive_2

Double-A

nightbat

The link is just too way far over the heads of all the auk
coffeeboys Commander, most likely their collective junk gene baby brains
will simply clueless overload implode.

ponder on,
the nightbat


Lt. General Bohne
Actually there is no "space" at all - just differences in energy :-)
but don't tell them - they might fear that the universe will crush
them ;:

C.

nightbat

Correct number one, the little fake award auk clueless fun
darlings are so sensitive they can't fathom the sub quantum domain
constantly demanding physical energy proof.

cheers,
the nightbat

On Apr 21, 1:24 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote:
In article .com,

Double-A wrote:
A natural interpretation of equation (2) (Hamilton 2004) is that space
is flowing radially inward [...] and that particles can travel through
this moving space according to the laws of special relativity [...]
This is analogous to the FRW coordinates, where the "river" of space
was expanding rather than flowing."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_ta...fcva/archive_2

Double-A

Its an analogy just for BH's AA

--


As flows the black holes, so flows the universe!

Double-A

On Apr 22, 6:46 am, Double-A wrote:

On Apr 21, 1:24 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck phineaspuddled...@

Its (just) an analogy just for BH's..

Yep AA, this new "river" BH model is a re-hash of the old Painleve-
Gullstrand metric that was discussed here several times (with credits
to Zinni). It's carefully couched as an analogy so as to never imply
anything is *literally* flowing.

Yet space is declared to *expand* from the instant of the BB. So how
pray tell, does it expand *without* flowing?

As flows the black holes, so flows the universe!

Yowser! http://community-2.webtv.net/oldcoot/ContinuousBigBang

On Apr 22, 8:19 am, oldcoot wrote:
On Apr 22, 6:46 am, Double-A wrote:

On Apr 21, 1:24 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck phineaspuddled...@
Its (just) an analogy just for BH's..

Yep AA, this new "river" BH model is a re-hash of the old Painleve-
Gullstrand metric that was discussed here several times (with credits
to Zinni). It's carefully couched as an analogy so as to never imply
anything is *literally* flowing.

Yet space is declared to *expand* from the instant of the BB. So how
pray tell, does it expand *without* flowing?

As flows the black holes, so flows the universe!

Yowser!http://community-2.webtv.net/oldcoot/ContinuousBigBang


Well, I just saw Puddles state that curved spacetime is an analogy
too!

****, maybe the whole universe is just an analogy!

Double-A

On Apr 22, 9:48 am, Double-A wrote:

Well, I just saw Puddles state that curved spacetime is an analogy
too!

No! You didn't. Har!
Well maybe Pudz can now recite what it's an analogy
*of*.

It couldn't be the *acceleration rate* of flowing space, now could
it? :-)

oc