|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Pat Flannery wrote:
Derek Lyons wrote: Scroll north from the there, and in the first 'lot' is what looks like E-3's... But they are too small. What in 'ell are they? E2s? (http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/e-2.htm) Whatever they are, they look like they have multiple vertical tails- and that narrows down the possibilities greatly. Just north of those is what sure as hell looks like a gaggle of E-1's! If it is, those puppies have been in the desert sun a LONG time. (http://www.shanaberger.com/images/E-1.htm) They sure look like them with the wings folded, don't they? And the radome has the correct ovoid shape. Terraserver has much more detailed images: http://terraserver.microsoft.com/ima...ct ucson%7caz shows the 'U2s' at the southern edge of the image. They may be RB58s. Scrolling north shows more U2s or RB58s along with the 'E2s' and what are almost certainly E1 radomes. Scrolling firther north confirms that 'gaggle' is indeed E1s. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote:
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=davis-....823265&sll=32 .221667,-110.925833&spn=0.010461,0.011619&sspn=0.106773,0.1 11580&t=k&hl=en For some broken planes. (I'm assuming done this way treaty compliance.) Yes, they are broken up and left to sit for a short while so the Russians can verify (via 'national technical means' - I.E. recon sats) the number of aircraft that have been destroyed. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Pat Flannery wrote:
I thought the wings looked a little short also; they might be some other type of aircraft with the engine nacelles removed- I just can't figure out which one. They seem to be mid or high wing and single vertical tailed, but they don't look squat enough to be cargo planes. Neptunes minus motors and tip tanks? There's quite a concentration of Naval aircraft there... which increases the probability score of this thesis. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
(Derek Lyons) writes: Pat Flannery wrote: I thought the wings looked a little short also; they might be some other type of aircraft with the engine nacelles removed- I just can't figure out which one. They seem to be mid or high wing and single vertical tailed, but they don't look squat enough to be cargo planes. Neptunes minus motors and tip tanks? There's quite a concentration of Naval aircraft there... which increases the probability score of this thesis. As i mentioned elsewhere - Most of 'em are C-118s, the military model of the DC-6. There are a few Neptunes, a smattering of P-3s. and it looks like half the world's supply of C-7 Caribous. And the HU-16s, of course. -- Pete Stickney Without data, all you have are opinions |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Hedrick wrote: A special blend of the finest cannibis. Practically out of this world! "Is this Lard Ass?" "Codename Hard Hat- Hard Hat! Do you know who you are speaking to?" "No...do you know who you are speaking to?" "No..." "Adios, Lard Ass..." Still one of the best lines in cinema :-D . Pat |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
So...why are we storing these planes? Why aren't we selling them or
recycling them? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 1 | March 2nd 05 04:35 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 4th 05 04:21 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |