|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Action-at-a-distance
The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website
describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Action-at-a-distance
kenseto wrote:
The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Rubbish! Learn GTR. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Action-at-a-distance
Sam Wormley wrote: kenseto wrote: The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Rubbish! Learn GTR. Hey idiot runt....GTR has no phyiscal mechanism for an object to follow the curvature of spacetime. BTW what is spacetime if an object can follow its curvature? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Action-at-a-distance
kenseto wrote: Sam Wormley wrote: kenseto wrote: The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Rubbish! Learn GTR. Hey idiot runt....GTR has no phyiscal mechanism for an object to follow the curvature of spacetime. BTW what is spacetime if an object can follow its curvature? If space-time is fundamental, then it can have no mechanism--it *is* the mechanism. Philosophical stances don't make for good premises to counter-arguments, since opinions are as plentiful as assholes. Richard Perry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Action-at-a-distance
RP wrote: kenseto wrote: Sam Wormley wrote: kenseto wrote: The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Ken Seto Rubbish! Learn GTR. Hey idiot runt....GTR has no phyiscal mechanism for an object to follow the curvature of spacetime. BTW what is spacetime if an object can follow its curvature? If space-time is fundamental, then it can have no mechanism--it *is* the mechanism. What do you mean by space-time is fundamental? Are you using the word *fundamental* to avoid explaining what is the mechanism for gravity? Philosophical stances don't make for good premises to counter-arguments, since opinions are as plentiful as assholes. Your assertion that space-time is fundamental is a philosophical stance. So I guess that your assertion is one of those asshole that you mentioned. Ken Seto |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Action-at-a-distance
kenseto wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote: kenseto wrote: The paper entitled "Unification of Physics" in the following website describes the mysterious processes of action-at-a-distance: http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm Translation: "I strung a new pseudoscientific word salad together and pasted it into my kook****e." Ken Seto Rubbish! Learn GTR. Hey idiot runt....GTR has no phyiscal mechanism for an object to follow the curvature of spacetime. BTW what is spacetime if an object can follow its curvature? kenseto gets frothy again -- film at 10:00pm. -- COOSN-266-06-39716 Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion", as designated by Brad Guth Hi, fanbois! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Welcome! - read this first | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 9 | February 2nd 06 02:37 AM |
Astronomical | Charles Francis | Research | 24 | December 27th 05 11:05 AM |
Cosmic acceleration rediscovered | Lars Wahlin | Research | 36 | January 22nd 05 12:39 PM |
Why EPR is only a signpost towards controlled FTL action | Greysky | Misc | 21 | November 10th 04 08:00 PM |
Astronomers Measure Distance to Well-Known Star | Ron | Misc | 17 | January 30th 04 03:01 AM |